Haha. Yes fair enough. That's our lot as fans.(& of course I know more than an AFL team’s brains trust)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha. Yes fair enough. That's our lot as fans.(& of course I know more than an AFL team’s brains trust)
I don't mind it personally because we end up with 6 backs and 6 forwards after the bounce in any case and then we seemed to hold that structure pretty well from what I saw. Carlton had 8 in defence the 2nd half - clearly we were dangerous enough going forward (even with 5 starting at bounces) that they needed to do that.Thanks for that, but I personally don’t like it (& of course I know more than an AFL team’s brains trust) for the simple reason that we seem to win our fair share of centre bounce clearances, so we end up clearing it to an area where we are outnumbered
I didn't spend a single solitary second of my footballing career considering my appearance or that of my opponent tbh.Long sleeves debate does anyone think it makes a difference to the mental side of the game.
There were like 6 carlton wearing long sleeves in a indoor venue so it must have been freezing. I dont know i am not saying there soft as to play afl you have to be courageous. But if that was me i wouldn't want my opponent looking at me wearing long sleeve especially at a indoor venue thinking i was a bit of a sook.
How long has it been since a freo player wore one. Certainly no one has since ross arrived
Brayshaw's ball use was/is a problem. Judging by his handball to kick ratio he is aware of it so at least we know he's working on it.Yeah, it was noted by our group at the game was the rotation of the starting mids, with there being lots of chances for our youngsters in there.
I disagree about Brayshaw’s game as his ball use was pretty poor.
I know I will be painted as being biased against the kid, but I did vote him BYB in one of our earlier games.
For mine, Giro was easily the best of our first year players yesterday.
Tucker is quite enigmatic, at times looking fantastic, but going missing for lots of the game.
Last week it was Cox’s forward line, & this week it was Apeness who ruled there.
Happy times ahead, with Taberner set to fit in there
In the Collingwood game he played the last quarter as an inside mid starting in the square and did pretty well in junk time.Is Tucker playing the graveyard Barlow / De boer role though? He makes good decisions when he does get it, not too worried for now about output.
On the centre bounce set-ups, we've been rotating kids through for a while and often there will be 1-2 kids in at the bounce. We're a lot more unpredictable in how we run it. Mentioned this before but it was good seeing mundy telling giro where to stand (moved him around the far side more into space to increase the angles). It's the best learning environment we could provide to the kids. On the job training
Totally agree. A few of us were surprised he didn't get a call-up after his game against East Perth. Not sure why it took another 6 weeks for Ross to play him, but fair to say the scape-goating of Matera and McCarthy could have been avoided.So impressed with Apeness. Crashed packs and tackles hard. Set shot is great and he’s unselfish when he needs to be. That 2nd ruck role has been our killer all year even when we had Taberner. Need that guy so our forward line still has a tall.
Yeah he had a few fumbles/turnovers and didn't always hit his target but if you put it in the context of a first year player (@ just 18yo) not only playing midfield but often getting in and under and beating far more experienced mids I think you should expect and excuse a fair bit of that. How many 18 year olds have been put right on ball and been flawless? Brayshaw had a really well rounded game - 1 goal, 20 disposals, 12 kicks, 7 contested, 5 marks, 5 tackles, 3 clearances, 3 i50s, 24 pressure acts, 352 metres gained (more than Fyfe, just slightly behind Neale) and a massive 8 score involvements (Crowden is our only first year player to have had more in a game, with 9 in Round 5, Cerra also had 8 in Rd 5 playing as a forward).I disagree about Brayshaw’s game as his ball use was pretty poor.
Yeah he had a few fumbles/turnovers and didn't always hit his target but if you put it in the context of a first year player (@ just 18yo) not only playing midfield but often getting in and under and beating far more experienced mids I think you should expect and excuse a fair bit of that. How many 18 year olds have been put right on ball and been flawless? Brayshaw had a really well rounded game - 1 goal, 20 disposals, 12 kicks, 7 contested, 5 marks, 5 tackles, 3 clearances, 3 i50s, 24 pressure acts, 352 metres gained (more than Fyfe, just slightly behind Neale) and a massive 8 score involvements (Crowden is our only first year player to have had more in a game, with 9 in Round 5, Cerra also had 8 in Rd 5 playing as a forward).
Adam Cerra, Bailey Banfield, Stefan GiroI think Brayshaw gets the rising star this week. Who else deserves it?
I think Brayshaw gets the rising star this week. Who else deserves it?
Slightly younger and slightly more inexperienced.
View attachment 513218
AFL Player ratings for what they are worth.
View attachment 513220
I thought SPS looked a bit ordinary, or at least well below what I expected. I think the commentators described some of his work as lazy. I am fine with the risk the club took by going for a trade down and getting Logue who has huge upside. As with all talls it may take awhile to see what he becomes, but he definitely looks like he can become a genuine weapon.One "sliding doors" moment that I couldn't get out during the game is what the team would have looked like with SPS playing for us, while McCarthy and Logue were not on the park. Don't get me wrong, I still believe in Cam Mac and its too early to make big statements about Griff, but it's a good example of an alternative outcome if we decided we didn't want to put our first round pick on the table, albeit for a pick downgrade.
TLDR; happy times.
Yeah the player ratings system is pretty useless for comparing all players against each other. It still gives some indication when you compare players that play similar roles. Although ideally you'd want the algorithm to change based on role - but role can also be pretty subjective so it'd have limited accuracy.
BTW Fyfe is now back up to #3 according to Player Ratings (hasn't been updated on AFL.com.au yet). Biggest rise of any player in the AFL (started at #57 this season).
I thought SPS looked a bit ordinary, or at least well below what I expected. I think the commentators described some of his work as lazy. I am fine with the risk the club took by going for a trade down and getting Logue who has huge upside. As with all talls it may take awhile to see what he becomes, but he definitely looks like he can become a genuine weapon.
I gave up on on the Afl rating system years ago , The reason well it makes no f*****g sense . a player who has been injured for a year can a higher rating than someone who is playing , On their rating system (i really don't know how it works )A player who has got to the the number one ranking can play a lot of crap games before he starts dropping . For example i think Fyfes rating was higher for most of his injured year than his Brownlow one .Thanks for those, very "interesting".
So both Langdon and Mundy rated well below Plowman, Jed Lamb and Dale Thomas??
Based on what - lack of hairstyle points??
Gee whiz I can't follow how the AFL brains trust come up with those ratings...
Only reason Logue was playing WAFL was coming back from injury. Before this latest injury he was absolutely tearing it up in his,second game back. Would have been a lock for the following week.I thought SPS looked ok. I think a lot of players can look lazy when their team is getting shellacked. My only point is that for years we yearned after a tall forward through trade or free agency, and I saw some irony that while the one we traded for is playing 2nds, a guy we could have had would have looked good in our team - IMO.
I agree Logue has upside and Cam Mac has time on his side, I was happy with the deal then and don't have any regrets... Maybe I'm wondering if we don't need to chase (read trade for) key forwards anymore and just let ours develop.