Fujitsu not fazed by CAS fallout

Remove this Banner Ad

Bombfire said:
You prefer to ignore the fact that on 31 March 2015 34 players were rightfully found not guilty of using banned substances, or to couch it another way, the allegations by ASADA were unfounded. Of course, your type believe it was a miscarriage of justice and applauded the decision by WADA to appeal to another tribunal who came up with a decision that was based on stinking second hand dental floss masquerading as strands in cable. Now you have the temerity to roll out crap like externalizing and reality checks. That's why your type can go back to your own backyard and leave Essendon Football Club to sort out it's own mess.
Click to expand...

It's these posts from your 'types' that have made this saga so entertaining.
Though you do at least admit it's your own mess...some kudos to you
 
Just thank the footy gods that they are forever drug cheats. For anti essendon types it is a known. Fair game booing material if it's your thing. The essendon players will have to sign consent forms, stating they will not sue the club for post traumatic stress at being boo'd everywhere they played. They will have to learn to not take it personally, all this boo's. Be made to understand it is the club we are all boo'g. And that the man connected to it most, the lynch pin was hird. At least we/I have got that base level of satisfaction for now.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

armpit said:
Just thank the footy gods that they are forever drug cheats. For anti essendon types it is a known. Fair game booing material if it's your thing. The essendon players will have to sign consent forms, stating they will not sue the club for post traumatic stress at being boo'd everywhere they played. They will have to learn to not take it personally, all this boo's. Be made to understand it is the club we are all boo'g. And that the man connected to it most, the lynch pin was hird. At least we/I have got that base level of satisfaction for now.
Click to expand...

As an Essendon man, i will accept the booing.
 
Bombfire said:
You prefer to ignore the fact that on 31 March 2015 34 players were rightfully found not guilty of using banned substances, or to couch it another way, the allegations by ASADA were unfounded. Of course, your type believe it was a miscarriage of justice and applauded the decision by WADA to appeal to another tribunal who came up with a decision that was based on stinking second hand dental floss masquerading as strands in cable. Now you have the temerity to roll out crap like externalizing and reality checks. That's why your type can go back to your own backyard and leave Essendon Football Club to sort out it's own mess.
Click to expand...

Hahahhaha how the fork did I miss this little gem first time round?!?
 
Bombfire said:
You prefer to ignore the fact that on 31 March 2015 34 players were rightfully found not guilty of using banned substances, or to couch it another way, the allegations by ASADA were unfounded. Of course, your type believe it was a miscarriage of justice and applauded the decision by WADA to appeal to another tribunal who came up with a decision that was based on stinking second hand dental floss masquerading as strands in cable. Now you have the temerity to roll out crap like externalizing and reality checks. That's why your type can go back to your own backyard and leave Essendon Football Club to sort out it's own mess.
Click to expand...
You're type is ....embarrassingly ignorant. ??? Haven't learnt much???
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Underdog said:
Or more likely, they realise they're going to get a s**t-ton of publicity without any backlash. Nobody is going to be in the market for an aircon and think "Fujitsu looks good, but they support those Essendon flogs so i'll get an LG instead".
Click to expand...

Exactly.

It'll more depend on which side people come down on the comfort women issue.
 
ODNBlue said:
No RedandBlackie, we're talking about a small, regional tribunal delivering a parochial result that a global sports tribunal (the highest court in sports) slapped down...
Click to expand...

The irony of which is, they will have disagreed with all the other punishments handed down by the AFL - whether the recent "governance" punishment, or the salary cap breaches from the 90s - related to the club.

Though maybe its possible they do always back the AFL. Like when they punished Melbourne for not tanking. Maybe they truly believe that wasnt a complete and utter farce. But they'd be the only ones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top