Remove this Banner Ad

Gary Ablett.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter SirJimi05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Whatever the case, i'm still glad that Gary Ablett plays for Geelong.

He is hardly a negative influence on the team.....gawd, just check out his game last week against the Swans if your in doubt.
 
Whatever the case, i'm still glad that Gary Ablett plays for Geelong.

He is hardly a negative influence on the team.....gawd, just check out his game last week against the Swans if your in doubt.

Come on mate, open your eyes - he was just trying to pad his stats in that game! Never mind being a match winner for the hoops - he was looking for SC points, not to mention Brownlow votes.
 
Re: Stats and Gazza.

And I am quite certain that anyone who would agree is a fool.

Actually, no, I agree with you. I am sure now that he plays just so he can his name in the paper with "Possessions - 40" next to his name, not because he actually wants work to hard, win the ball and try to dispose of the ball to advantage of Geelong. It has to be because he wants to be in first place on the Herald Sun 'Disposals' leaderboard.

Agreed. And to help his Brownlow chances. No other explanation for the cheap 1-2's in the back half when he's under no pressure
 
This isn't a debate between Swan and Ablett regarding who gets more cheap disposal. For someone who is considered by so many to be the best in the game 50% of his disposals are cheap and useless. That wouldn't be such a problem if people didn't carry on about how each and every touch he has is pure magic. I think Tim Watson was 100% correct in his comments last week. I am enjoying him having a little cry at the end of Geelong losses. Reminds me of the 08 GF :thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He had a good game today, but people will look at his 40 possessions and assume he dominated.

He had a great 3rd quarter, the rest was junk . . .
 
Re: Stats and Gazza.

And I am quite certain that anyone who would agree is a fool.

Actually, no, I agree with you. I am sure now that he plays just so he can his name in the paper with "Possessions - 40" next to his name, not because he actually wants work to hard, win the ball and try to dispose of the ball to advantage of Geelong. It has to be because he wants to be in first place on the Herald Sun 'Disposals' leaderboard.


Good to see you isolote one part of the OP. Well done to you, sir.

We all know that Gazza is pretty passionate about winning individual awards. You can't deny that, surely?
 
So.....

Will he get any Brownlow votes tonight?

Boyd/Johnson/Selwood/Cooney/Scarlett/Lake all played excellent games.

If Lake doesn't get the 3 votes in the Brownlow this week then defenders might as well not show up on Brownlow night.

IMO, he was the best player on the field by quite a margin.

But maybe i'm partial to defenders. I thought Scarlett was Geelong's best.
 
:D:thumbsu:

I'm over bagging Ablett about the 1-2's. He is still a gun and has had to change the way he plays this year but there is no doubt he was just as effective last year with 25 touches as he is this year with 40 touches.

People go on about it like Ablett is the only player in the comp that gets possessions in a 1-2 situation and that is the only way he gets his hands on the ball.

Maybe the club like the ball to be given to the player with the best disposal and decision making ablity.

If you had a choice to handball it to Ablett 2 meters away or kick it 20 meters up the feild to Byrnes you don't have to wonder which option has the better chance of the ball ending up with the most advantage to the team.
 
Re: Stats and Gazza.

Good to see you isolote one part of the OP. Well done to you, sir.

We all know that Gazza is pretty passionate about winning individual awards. You can't deny that, surely?

I can neither deny nor confirm, since I haven't asked him. Since the only proof we have one way or another is a grimace after being runner up in the Brownlow (supposedly), I am not sure that being 'passionate' about it is really what we're looking for here. I am sure he'd be disappointed to lose the Brownlow after being the favourite two years in a row - but to assert that he is passionate about winning it is more than a bit of a stretch!
 
Jobe Watson 30 = 40
Gary Ablett 40 = 25 :p

So your motives are now clear.

You feel the need to make sure everyone believes that Watson is a better player than Ablett.

Is that why his daddy was in the media last week trying to make everyone believe Ablett's only goal in life is to win a brownlow so people will start to think less of him and appreciate his son a little more?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Re: Stats and Gazza.

I can neither deny nor confirm, since I haven't asked him. Since the only proof we have one way or another is a grimace after being runner up in the Brownlow (supposedly), I am not sure that being 'passionate' about it is really what we're looking for here. I am sure he'd be disappointed to lose the Brownlow after being the favourite two years in a row - but to assert that he is passionate about winning it is more than a bit of a stretch!

He sat there with a sad, pissed off, glum look on his face for over 10 minutes. All the other guys that went close were having a laugh and looked genuinely happy for Cooney. I don't think it is more than a bit of a stretch to come to the conclusion that he is pretty keen on winning this individual award, after the evidence that was provided.
 
Re: Stats and Gazza.

He sat there with a sad, pissed off, glum look on his face for over 10 minutes. All the other guys that went close were having a laugh and looked genuinely happy for Cooney. I don't think it is more than a bit of a stretch to come to the conclusion that he is pretty keen on winning this individual award, after the evidence that was provided.

All the others that went close were also probably full of booze and not trying to get ready for a grand final that week.

As if anyone could sit through a brownlow and be happy at the end if they could not dull down the boredom with some alcohol.
 
People go on about it like Ablett is the only player in the comp that gets possessions in a 1-2 situation and that is the only way he gets his hands on the ball.

Maybe the club like the ball to be given to the player with the best disposal and decision making ablity.

If you had a choice to handball it to Ablett 2 meters away or kick it 20 meters up the feild to Byrnes you don't have to wonder which option has the better chance of the ball ending up with the most advantage to the team.
Don't understand the constant bashing of byrnes by you cat fans, he isn't that bad. He made a couple of blues tonite but then again so did enright in fact enright's decision making tonite was the worst ive seen from him in a while.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So your motives are now clear.

You feel the need to make sure everyone believes that Watson is a better player than Ablett.

Is that why his daddy was in the media last week trying to make everyone believe Ablett's only goal in life is to win a brownlow so people will start to think less of him and appreciate his son a little more?

Next time i will remember to end my post with an emotion like a smiley face or a tongue poking face......Oh wait. :rolleyes:

You're talking about the same bloke who kicks like a busted arse, right?

Nah i was talking about Jobe Watson.
 
He was pretty much the only player trying to get some run out of the backline tonight. I guess when he's the only one trying, then he needs to go the 1-2-1-2-3-1-3-1-2-1 as the teammates aren't helping.
 
We are comparing Jobe with Gary Jnr now?

Ablett gets so many possessions because he runs his arse off. His possessions are all quality, including his many handballs. Opposition know how quickly he can burn them off and put them to the sword, so he drags about three players to him and always releases into space, creating room for his teammates to run in waves.

Very little to criticise about his game.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom