http://www.straitstimes.com/world/u...can-refuse-wedding-cake-order-from-gay-couple
There are two legal proceedings in the US about two incidents that occurred in Colorado and California.
In both cases a gay couple requested a baker with strong religious beliefs to bake a wedding cake to celebrate their nuptials. The bakers refused on religious grounds and so the gay couples sued on discrimination grounds.
A court in Bakersfield California, ruled in a judgement on Monday (Feb 5) night that the shop owner was able to deny baking a cake specifically for a same-sex couple.
"No baker may place their wares in public display case, open their shop, and then refuse to sell because of race, religion, gender, or gender identification," the ruling said.
But "the difference here is that the cake in question is not yet baked."
The court said to make the baker "use her talents to design and create cake she has not yet conceived with the knowledge that her work will be displayed in celebration of marital union her religion forbids" would violate the US first amendment that protects free speech.
There is still some sanity in California .
There are two legal proceedings in the US about two incidents that occurred in Colorado and California.
In both cases a gay couple requested a baker with strong religious beliefs to bake a wedding cake to celebrate their nuptials. The bakers refused on religious grounds and so the gay couples sued on discrimination grounds.
A court in Bakersfield California, ruled in a judgement on Monday (Feb 5) night that the shop owner was able to deny baking a cake specifically for a same-sex couple.
"No baker may place their wares in public display case, open their shop, and then refuse to sell because of race, religion, gender, or gender identification," the ruling said.
But "the difference here is that the cake in question is not yet baked."
The court said to make the baker "use her talents to design and create cake she has not yet conceived with the knowledge that her work will be displayed in celebration of marital union her religion forbids" would violate the US first amendment that protects free speech.
There is still some sanity in California .