Remove this Banner Ad

Geel V Melb

  • Thread starter Thread starter cats2rise
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

ecleftic said:
Josh trained okay and looked to be running without problems.

Go CATS!!

Sounds good, i hope he does get up and play. Would b a big loss.
 
GEELONG
B: Milburn, Scarlett, Sanderson
HB: Rooke, Mooney, Hunt
C: Riccardi, Bartel, Koulouriotis
HF: G.Ablett, Playfair, S.Johnson
F: Kingsley, Ottens, Chapman
FOLL: Blake, Corey, Ling
I/C: Kelly, Egan, Byrnes, Tenace
EMG: Spencer, Haynes, N.Ablett

IN: Byrnes, Mooney
OUT: Enright (shoulder), Haynes

MELBOURNE
B: Bell, Ferguson, Nicholson
HB: Whelan, Wheatley, Brown
C: Yze, Moloney, Rigoni
HF: Robertson, Miller, Davey
F: Motlop, Neitz, Holland
FOLL: White, Johnstone, Godfrey
I/C: Bizzell, Armstrong, Green, McLean
EMG: P.Johnson, Read, C.Johnson

IN: Neitz, Green, Johnstone, Whelan
OUT: Ward, P.Johnson, C.Johnson, Read

-------------------

Change your surname to Gardiner, Dessy. :(
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Extremely unlucky.

A performance like that would've given Snout Gardiner a year long exemption from being dropped.

haynes.jpg
 
Phat said:
Extremely unlucky.

A performance like that would've given Snout Gardiner a year long exemption from being dropped.QUOTE]

I thought with our struggling forward line, it would make sense to keep him in. I didnt see all the game last week as i was working, but i saw his snap in the alst quarter and him chase abit too
 
I think i'll bring back the 'Bomber's Boys' club.

President: Charlie
V President: Fumbles
Secretary: Dog

Dessy, Liz, Fresh and a few others were denied membership long ago.
 
Phat said:
I think i'll bring back the 'Bomber's Boys' club.

President: Charlie
V President: Fumbles
Secretary: Dog

Dessy, Liz, Fresh and a few others were denied membership long ago.

In fairness, Fumbles has earned his spot now.
 
Phat said:
Extremely unlucky.

A performance like that would've given Snout Gardiner a year long exemption from being dropped.
QUOTE]
You must be joking he was nothing short of disgusting, were you at the game or watching it at home on TV? His work rate was appalling and was continually avoiding contact and hard work. He should never be played again; Johnson on 12 stubbies would be better value.

Get rid of him.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hey guys we shouldn't fight. It's ti me to come together cause Nathan is gona play. Go Nathan, I love you.

Hey Phat are you really fat? My friend Daniel thinks you must be with a name like that.

C'MON THE MIGHTY CATS GET IT ON, NATHAN WILL WIN THE MATCH!
 
Shaitan said:
In fairness, Fumbles has earned his spot now.

He has now, yes. Early on he was treated very kindly though.

jacmitgee said:
Phat, what's with the new avatar? Is this a statement or a wish!!
Just curious :rolleyes:

Wish.

Or should i just go with the flow and call him a fat slob and make a cliched joke about him liking KFC?


bulletproof said:
You must be joking he was nothing short of disgusting, were you at the game or watching it at home on TV? His work rate was appalling and was continually avoiding contact and hard work. He should never be played again; Johnson on 12 stubbies would be better value.

Get rid of him.

His performance was better than anything Charlie Gardiner has dished up in 2005.
Charlie has played 12 games.
 
hey just a lil question for yaz about Scarlett.

ofcourse last year down at SS he kept neitz goalless, nearly possessionless and picked up 3 brownlow votes in one of the best FB games ive seen.

now this year, an out of form neitz beat scarlett and kicked 5 goals, not an overly huge bag but still a good effort for an out of form player.

now neitz is coming back from a knee injury and is possibly not fully fit while russell robertson is right up there on the goal kicking table and has kicked big bags against good opponents like St.Kilda but he normally kicks big goals when Neitz is there to take the best defender away, in this case Scarlett.

basically what im wondering is do you reckon it would be wise for Scarlett to take Robertson automatically? he would have a big height advantage and robbo is our best forward really. most dangerious atleast. who would then take neitz? mooney? and then Miller and Holland also.

i'd actually really looking forward to this game as i, unlike many others, reckon it will be a high quality and highly physical game cos its a must win for both teams, melbourne more then geelong
 
Phat said:
His performance was better than anything Charlie Gardiner has dished up in 2005.
Charlie has played 12 games.

Charlie played a great game against the Bulldogs, he may have a future, Haynes does not, that is certain.
 
I think Scarlett will most likely get Neitz.

Last week was similar, Scarlett played on Gehrig, and Gehrig played out of the way as a decoy more, and left it to Hamill, Reiwoldt, and Koschitski.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Channel 10 (and Thompson) are giving every indication that all three emergencies will play.

Apparently Kingsley, Chapman and Mooney will be late withdrawals.
 
Phat said:
Channel 10 (and Thompson) are giving every indication that all three emergencies will play.

Apparently Kingsley, Chapman and Mooney will be late withdrawals.
YES YES AND YES OH THANK GOD :)

soz guys

oh and Ricketts, yeh i reckon Neitz will be a decoy for Yze and especially Robbo. i still want/expect him to kick atleast 2-3 goals but robbo has it in him to kick 6 and win us the match...but then again he kicked 6 vs the saints and that game went well
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom