Geelong and Hawthorn record monumentally embarrassing 1300 page shitfight thread. (Part 2)

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lethality

I AM THE Geelong Cats
Joined
Oct 23, 2014
Posts
29,564
Likes
34,453
Location
Top of the AFLM ladder
AFL Club
Gold Coast
Other Teams
Melbourne Victory, NY Rangers
Then it appears Huddo has NFI what he's talking about here. Decision is still being made. :thumbsu:
Either way Geelong loses. You either get a cooked Bartel holding back the development of Stephen Wells' shitty picks, or the overrated Bartel finally retires and you don't even get Pick 88.
 

Hawk Dork

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Feb 9, 2005
Posts
26,581
Likes
21,601
Location
on the road to nowhere
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Hawks
Either way Geelong loses. You either get a cooked Bartel holding back the development of Stephen Wells' shitty picks, or the overrated Bartel finally retires and you don't even get Pick 88.
and Jimmy doesnt get an extra $1,000,000 to put in his super
 

Hoooops

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 17, 2016
Posts
6,493
Likes
9,622
Location
Gold City
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Melbourne Stars, Canberra Raiders
Either way Geelong loses. You either get a cooked Bartel holding back the development of Stephen Wells' shitty picks, or the overrated Bartel finally retires and you don't even get Pick 88.
Yes, I'm so jealous of your Pick 88. Green with envy. :rolleyes:
 

TazHawk15

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Posts
13,059
Likes
14,879
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
There are no other teams
Lol, the goo chuggers are being investigated for draft tampering, using Vickery of all people, lol.

AFL quizzes Hawthorn for a second time over Vickery deal


Nick Bowen and Matt Thompson October 17, 2016 3:20 PM


HAWTHORN has been quizzed by the AFL for a second time about the circumstances behind free agent Ty Vickery's move to Waverley amid opposition disquiet about how the Hawks' offer was structured.

Any club that makes a free agency or trade offer is routinely questioned about the terms of the deal when it lodges it with the AFL.

The Hawks lodged a two-year deal for Vickery believed to be worth about $1 million a week ago, but were called into League headquarters again on Monday morning when AFL officials questioned them once more about the mechanics of the Vickery deal.

Despite earlier speculation Richmond might match a Hawthorn offer to the restricted free agent, the Tigers let Vickery pass to the Hawks without any fight after being advised the spearhead's lucrative new deal would earn them a second-round compensation pick (currently No.26).

Rival clubs have privately expressed concerns about whether the Vickery deal was structured to ensure the spearhead got to Waverley and Richmond was compensated with an attractive pick.

The Hawks were linked to Vickery late in the 2016 season and industry sources initially believed they were considering tabling a three-year offer that was expected to earn Richmond an end-of-second or third-round pick.


When announcing Vickery's signing, Hawthorn published a statement on social media saying the 26-year-old had accepted a three-year deal, but quickly replaced it with an updated version that referred to a two-year deal.

An AFL spokesman said Monday's meeting was "part of our routine sign-off of all free agency moves and finalising of all trades".


Clubs contacted by AFL.com.au on Monday said they had only been required to discuss the details of free agency deals with the AFL at one meeting, which occurred when they lodged the official paperwork.

Vickery played 119 games and kicked 158 goals in eight seasons with Richmond after being recruited with pick No.8 in the 2008 NAB AFL Draft.

Richmond and Hawthorn have been contacted for comment.
Never mind about that the AFL should be investigating the way we have torn poor old Norf a newie over the years.

Who could forget they Hay deal.

Who could forget the Jed deal that landed us an absoulute jet in Burton.

Hale, Gibson need I go on?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Kangaroos4eva

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Posts
36,423
Likes
60,292
Location
NSW
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
West Ham United
Never mind about that the AFL should be investigating the way we have torn poor old Norf a newie over the years.

Who could forget they Hay deal.

Who could forget the Jed deal that landed us an absoulute jet in Burton.

Hale, Gibson need I go on?
SQWARK, SQWARK, BWARK


 

Hoooops

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 17, 2016
Posts
6,493
Likes
9,622
Location
Gold City
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Melbourne Stars, Canberra Raiders
At worst we get to upgrade one of our exciting rookies.

Bartel 476 disposals(6th) and 11 goals (11th) in 2016. He will be missed.
He's not best 22 anyway, so I'm not fussed. It's not like he finished 1st or 2nd in the B&F...
 

Wiggo4PM

Brownlow Medallist
Suspended
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Posts
10,536
Likes
10,488
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
An AFL spokesman said Monday's meeting was "part of our routine sign-off of all free agency moves and finalising of all trades".
LOL this was a piss weak attempt at deflection.

"AFL quizzes Hawthorn for a second time over Vickery deal"

Note: Second time

All clubs have to do this first and foremost and never get called in for a second meeting. That means there is a possible problem that needs clarification.

But lol try again.
 

Wiggo4PM

Brownlow Medallist
Suspended
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Posts
10,536
Likes
10,488
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Carlton
All the players leaving cant be ****** going around at 120% again and perform for their team under the weight of expectation, so they are ditching it for an easy pay cheque at clubs not expected to win a game or two.
 

STP18

Cancelled
Joined
May 4, 2013
Posts
6,684
Likes
16,600
AFL Club
Geelong
Haven't been paying much attention to the trades today, can anyone fill me in on what awful, club-destroying trades the Hawfies have managed to make today? I assume O'Meara is a Hawk by now, and Essendon haven't gotten in his ear about walking to the PSD.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom