If Sav's corkie means he needs a week out I'd prefer to see Abbott in rather than Fort. Constable in for Parfitt. Clark will be rested once Tuohy is ready to come back in, which won't be this week.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watching the VFL replay now. Narkle dished up both Fort's goals on a platter and kicked one himself in the first half. Tuohy had three touches in one piece of play and not much else up to half time.
Constable for Parfitt only for mine.
question for the people that watch the VFL regularly.
i know smith didn't play on the weekend, but usually we have Smith, Abbott & Fort in the one side. when this happens i assume at least 2 of them get a good amount of time playing forward. Who usually plays the most time forward, and how do they look purely as a forward, not a ruck?
Esava while promising, clearly isn't performing that highly at the moment so if he continues that you'd say he might make way for a bit.
it seems we have 3 genuine rucks in the 2's along with buzza as a for/ruck. Surely with that many rucks though they must all be getting some time in other positions?
You and me both heavily agree on this don't we...I would like Buzza in for Sav but as always I am happy with what ever the club does
Agree with the changes. (Perhaps keep Henry given the Eagles talks).Narkles defensive efforts are still poor.
Constable for Parfitt and Abbott for Sav for mine.
If Tuohy is fit him for Henry or Clark (rested).
yeah I agree that the dimensions of GMHBA is an advantage in terms of their game styleOur forward pressure will be pivotal in deciding this one.
The Eagles are the best at switching the footy in defence and using the width of Optus and MCG to move the ball precisely forward by foot , their turnover rate is low and they hit up their tall forwards well and have the crumbers at their feet.
The narrow GMHBA should help us , also the Eagles won't run in waves through the corridor like the Giants did to us.
If our forwards can stop the switch and trap it in F50 or force a rushed exit kick we can have the game on our terms.
Talk around the coffee machine this morning was that the Eagles were lethargic and didn't come to play like Port did - that won't happen 2 games in a row so this one should be a cracker
Whilst the Cat's will worry about their game and getting it right, i'm sure they the MC would have had a look at the way PA dismantled the eagles.
AlludeYeah Chris Scott did elude to that on AFL 360
Big test for Geelong...
One might say...
Collingwood.. Should have won and were underdone
Melb ... Looking more and more like they have had a bighead offseason
Adelaide... Any win over there is good but they are not playing like there were predicted
GWS .... Looked like a differnt level to us
Haw... Undermaned
Preseason it looked like the fixture from hell..but the match ups have fallen our way a bit....
but niw we play WC off a loss.. we play at home after losing at home last time out..
Big test for Geelong .. serious threat or not
Allude
Elude = Neo, bullets, matrix
Allude = Nudge nudge wink wink
You could have just gone with "it's not who you play but when you play them"Big test for Geelong...
One might say...
Collingwood.. Should have won and were underdone
Melb ... Looking more and more like they have had a bighead offseason
Adelaide... Any win over there is good but they are not playing like there were predicted
GWS .... Looked like a differnt level to us
Haw... Undermaned
Preseason it looked like the fixture from hell..but the match ups have fallen our way a bit....
but niw we play WC off a loss.. we play at home after losing at home last time out..
Big test for Geelong .. serious threat or not
I didn't think we'd be 4-1, put it that way.Very glass half empty there, Turbo. I don't think you're giving us enough credit for those wins. To be 4-1 is certainly no fluke and given we have blooded several young and promising players, this year has been a raging success so far.