- Banned
- #801
Yea should of played Jenkins imo for team structure.I know I'm stating the obvious, but
-Cameron and Sav are out injured.
-Rohan and Danger are suspended.
What choice do we have? Jenkins?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Yea should of played Jenkins imo for team structure.I know I'm stating the obvious, but
-Cameron and Sav are out injured.
-Rohan and Danger are suspended.
What choice do we have? Jenkins?
Given there would be about 100 supporters that have seen him play live/TV/even 2 mins of highlights in the last 2 years, I’m comfortably happy to back the club here.I'm worried that they're putting in Holmes way too quickly, he has what School football and two VFL practice matches before an AFL debut.
Could be a factor on a perfect quick G surface tomorrow.Yea should of played Jenkins imo for team structure.
Blic FBHow’s the structure with only one tall forward playing?
Seriously.. You're back again after the earlier warningYea should of played Jenkins imo for team structure.
We've effectively had one key forward for years. Not sure why we'd start worrying nowanyone else worried we only have 1 key forward?
Does it? Why do so many of late keep referencing <insert tall forwards here> as reasons Kreuger should play.The other issue is. ...it seems kicking scores in 'IN"... Kruger or someone as the third tall should be getting a game now... as we have no Rohan or Cameron or Sav. If not now...then when.
Sounds like structural failureYea should of played Jenkins imo for team structure.
Blic FB
Kolo CHB
Hendo CHF?
Bit late for that April Fool's gag.Maybe we're going to play Stanley up forward and up with Blicavs in the ruck
If we cough up intercept marks in f50 it's the mids kicking it there that are the issue not the targets they selected on the team sheet. They either moved it too slow or fluffed the kick.Not going to comment about selection of individuals but if we cough up more than 5 intercept marks inside our fwd 50-70 then the coaching panel deserve a big fat F.
I just cant see who will be bringing the ball to ground to allow our smalls to do their thing.
I would hope not. Their kpf targets are inexperienced but you can't teach height and kolo will get burned on a quick entry.Maybe we're going to play Stanley up forward and up with Blicavs in the ruck
Yeah but only to rest Stanley, not as plan AExpect that's exactly what will happen at times tomorrow
Won't happen anyway.No thanks
We've effectively had one key forward for years. Not sure why we'd start worrying now
I’d play Henry forward, he can provide an aerial contest and is actually a natural forward in some ways. Some of his best football at Geelong was forward I reckon.
When was that? ...I could stand corrected but, my recollection is he looked like a lost sheep when played as a forwardI’d play Henry forward, he can provide an aerial contest and is actually a natural forward in some ways. Some of his best football at Geelong was forward I reckon.
Agree. Only ? is his reliability as a goalkicker. Henry could be a real winner there. CS said he wants to play all his defenders, and that he wants them to be flexible- the only player destined to not move from defence now seems to be Kolo, but he too has had time on the wing.yes, love this. Goes well addressing the post I made a sec ago. Probably closest like for like with Rohan and the deficiency he leaves up forward
I disagree. If he hadn't stepped up as a defender he have been delisted I think. He kicked 3 against Brisbane once in 7 goal win and 2 against Freo that one time we beat them by like 22 goals. Other than that it's a couple of 1 goal returns.I’d play Henry forward, he can provide an aerial contest and is actually a natural forward in some ways. Some of his best football at Geelong was forward I reckon.
If he kicks 2 I will be rapt. Feel he just needs to create an aerial contest and not let hawthorn intercept mark all day because we don’t have anyone to fly for a mark, which could easily happen when we have Hawkins who doesn’t compete in packs and miers dalhaus higgins francis are not aerial players either. So we do have a problem without Rohan doing that role. I see us susceptible to being intercepted too easily up forwardAgree. Only ? is his reliability as a goalkicker. Henry could be a real winner there. CS said he wants to play all his defenders, and that he wants them to be flexible- the only player destined to not move from defence now seems to be Kolo, but he too has had time on the wing.
Pretty sure at least one of those occasions was quite similar to this where we were short a forward marking option. I remember as I backed Henry for first goal!I disagree. If he hadn't stepped up as a defender he have been delisted I think. He kicked 3 against Brisbane once in 7 goal win and 2 against Freo that one time we beat them by like 22 goals. Other than that it's a couple of 1 goal returns.
His wheelhouse is 3rd defender, intercept marks, and aerial threat disruption. I would hesitate to move him away from that