- Joined
- Aug 4, 2005
- Posts
- 22,931
- Likes
- 15,999
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Aussie cricket team
Under the AFL's drugs code, ASADA (not) WADA) decides conclusively whether an offence has been committed by the players, and recommends penalties, which the AFL and the players, through the CBA, have bound themselves to follow, subject to the right of the players, if they don't like the penalties, to take it to the AFL Tribunal. The Tribunal has power to decide whether to apply the special exemptions reducing penalties from 2 years to 6 months or zero. If WADA thinks the Tribunal has been too soft, it can appeal to the CAS. Any players who are suspended will almost certainly take legal action against suppliers, club, officials.
The AFL has not signed on to the WADA or ASADA rules and guidelines in relation to clubs or officials, and is not bound by them. However, if ASADA recommends penalties on the club or officials, the AFL will be politically/economically bound to apply them, using its general powers and rules, and maybe add some of their own, eg draft penalties and fines. I suspect that if any backdoor dealing has gone on between the parties (which I also suspect it has), it will have been on this aspect - agreement on punishments which ASADA can live with politically, and which the AFL can live with in terms of running the competition. But if Essendon is not on board, it will legally appeal any punishments it can't live with.
The AFL has not signed on to the WADA or ASADA rules and guidelines in relation to clubs or officials, and is not bound by them. However, if ASADA recommends penalties on the club or officials, the AFL will be politically/economically bound to apply them, using its general powers and rules, and maybe add some of their own, eg draft penalties and fines. I suspect that if any backdoor dealing has gone on between the parties (which I also suspect it has), it will have been on this aspect - agreement on punishments which ASADA can live with politically, and which the AFL can live with in terms of running the competition. But if Essendon is not on board, it will legally appeal any punishments it can't live with.
No way.
One, this isn't the elicit drug policy.
Two, Wada will control what the penalty is. There will be no AFL tribunal.

