Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
If i take my clothes off for a photo, the photo is now the property of the photo taker, unless i have a contract in place i would haveWhat you're advocating is that no one should trust anyone even when they have someones else's word, and that if you do, and you get ****** over it's your own fault.
It's the opposite of "taking responsibility for their own actions". You're giving the perp an out.
This sort of thought is ultimately victim blaming, and not holding people responsible for doing the wrong thing.
come on if it was a man no one would care! people just want to be outraged about anything these days. we have nukes pointing at us, the climate is changing but lets get upset at a photo that got passed around by some meat headsHer gender doesn't matter. The case as it stands is that allegedly there was no consent to distribute he picture. If a woman did this to a man the same rules would apply.
I don't care what gender you are - being naked in private doesn't mean you're open slather to have naked pictures of yourself mass distributed.
Or pro gun campaigners who would say it would have been stopped if someone had a gun to shoot the driver.Can't argue with that logic - just like how there would have been no Bourke Street Mall massacre if people had taken more personal responsibility to not be on the footpath when a car was driving on it at high speed.