No Oppo Supporters General AFL and other clubs discussion thread. **Opposition fans not welcome** Part 6

[Chief]

This is Part 6.

You can post in Part 7 here:

No Oppo Supporters - General AFL and other clubs discussion thread. **Opposition fans not welcome** Part 7

Previous chat threads can be found here https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/general-afl-and-other-clubs-discussion-thread-opposition-fans-not-welcome-part-5.1223668/ https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/general-afl-and-other-clubs-discussion-thread-opposition-fans-not-welcome-part-6.1244786/

www.bigfooty.com

 

[Off The Couch]

Sorry it’s in this thread but it’s in relation to the podcast

it was an Interesting text response to Don on Tasmania, all the more so now with the afl telling them no to a stand alone team.

Can JK commit to more games without asking the members

 

[Steven Tyler]

Sorry it’s in this thread but it’s in relation to the podcast

it was an Interesting text response to Don on Tasmania, all the more so now with the afl telling them no to a stand alone team.

Can JK commit to more games without asking the members

We went from 1 game, to 2, and then 4 when St Kilda pulled out of Tassie
Members were not asked back then


The Tassie Premier had better be careful or he just might end AFL in his state altogether

 

[moginie]

Sorry it’s in this thread but it’s in relation to the podcast

it was an Interesting text response to Don on Tasmania, all the more so now with the afl telling them no to a stand alone team.

Can JK commit to more games without asking the members

I don't believe so.

 

[Brishawk]

I don't believe so.

Unless there is something in the constitution that prevents it then Jeff can commit to more games. However I’d suggest he won’t survive the next agm if he does that.

 

[kirbatron]

Unless there is something in the constitution that prevents it then Jeff can commit to more games. However I’d suggest he won’t survive the next agm if he does that.

survival not an issue or concern for JK. interesting

 

[TylerDurden]

survival not an issue or concern for JK. interesting

It'd wanna be, or he'll be out of that role so fast his head will spin.

 

[Brant]

It'd wanna be, or he'll be out of that role so fast his head will spin.

Replaced by whom?
Isn't that the issue?

 

[TylerDurden]

Replaced by whom?
Isn't that the issue?

I dont care. I thought Radek Sali was next in line.

 

[Off The Couch]

Unless there is something in the constitution that prevents it then Jeff can commit to more games. However I’d suggest he won’t survive the next agm if he does that.

And this is what I think he will try to do to appease Tasmania - more games

 

[Brant]

And this is what I think he will try to do to appease Tasmania - more games

Increasing revenue, to contribute to Dingley though, right?

 

[Off The Couch]

Increasing revenue, to contribute to Dingley though, right?

What makes you think they will pay more
He has said that he will pull the sponsorship so I would say he holds all the cards here

 

[Brant]

What makes you think they will pay more
He has said that he will pull the sponsorship so I would say he holds all the cards here

Isn't it then implied (if they pull funding) that we then play zero games there?

Or are you suggesting we increase our games there whilst foregoing any revenue because funding is pulled?

 

[Off The Couch]

Isn't it then implied (if they pull funding) that we then play zero games there?

Or are you suggesting we increase our games there whilst foregoing any revenue because funding is pulled?

Its obviously late because I’ve officially got no clue what you’ve just posted

in fact rereading my post - mine made no sense either

 

[eldorado]

What makes you think they will pay more
He has said that he will pull the sponsorship so I would say he holds all the cards here

Isn't it then implied (if they pull funding) that we then play zero games there?

Or are you suggesting we increase our games there whilst foregoing any revenue because funding is pulled?

Its obviously late because I’ve officially got no clue what you’ve just posted

in fact rereading my post - mine made no sense either

If it's any consolation to you both, I can't understand either of you...

 

[CliffMcTainshaw]

WOW, Dusty's manager has seemed to suggest that Dusty will replace Franklin as a long term player at Sydney.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/d...l/news-story/5573bed05fc3f602a879cd29b0d46686

 

[Brant]

If it's any consolation to you both, I can't understand either of you...

Pretty simple, really.

Off The Couch said jjghyt nfuojfs bdjoitd g h outsfbbdt kgfugb jhf f yjbfddd.

I didn't agree so responded with hfdtygv jgrtddd mgd t yujbhfd gdtyhkkuff bvfyuijh hgfghjj jgfdyhbko.

Couchy saw it differently & closed the discussion with hftuijfe hdtuhvho kiygbjj fgttrddn jji it rtgvvhi.

I'm not really sure how else to explain it

 

[Ned Ryerson]

WOW, Dusty's manager has seemed to suggest that Dusty will replace Franklin as a long term player at Sydney

He’d be 33 turning 34 in 2025 when he is next a free agent. I wouldn’t be getting excited if I was a Swans fan.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

He’d be 33 turning 34 in 2025 when he is next a free agent. I wouldn’t be getting excited if I was a Swans fan.

The article suggest he only has two years left on this contract, unless I have misread something.

 

[wahawk]

The article suggest he only has two years left on this contract, unless I have misread something.

Contracted to end of 24 season

 

[wahawk]

He'd be 31 at the expiry of his current contract.

He’s 30 in June this year, making him 30 at seasons end
His contract expires after 2024 season making him 33 when contract expires

 

[CliffMcTainshaw]

He’s 30 in June this year, making him 30 at seasons end
His contract expires after 2024 season

I deleted the post, but it seems his manager has said he only has 2 years left at Richmond despite signing a a 7 year deal in 2017.

 

[Judd2Sewell]

Contracted to end of 24 season

Would require a huge trade then

 

[cryptor]

I deleted the post, but it seems his manager has said he only has 2 years left at Richmond despite signing a a 7 year deal in 2017.

Probably like how GWS gave Kelly a long term deal but with an exit clause in case he wanted to get out early.

Feels like Dusty knows he's done it all at Richmond and probably senses their run as a club is coming to an end in the next couple years. If he can swing a lucrative deal from the Swans post-age 30 then he'll be laughing.

I don't see this ending well for Sydney... and that's nice.

 

[wahawk]

Probably like how GWS gave Kelly a long term deal but with an exit clause in case he wanted to get out early.

Feels like Dusty knows he's done it all at Richmond and probably senses their run as a club is coming to an end in the next couple years. If he can swing a lucrative deal from the Swans post-age 30 then he'll be laughing.

I don't see this ending well for Sydney... and that's nice.

I don’t know that there’s an exit clause, I just think his manager means he has 2 more years after this season

 

[Ned Ryerson]

Are clubs and players still negotiating pay cuts for the next few seasons due to cap decreases? If so Ralphy might be bluffing to ensure that Dusty’s salary doesn’t get cut as much. If not - they’re awfully odd comments to make.