- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Posts
- 34,367
- Reaction score
- 57,682
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Ormond AFC
lets just say they're going to put the pies treatment of freeman to shame
Surely you aren't blaming the medical staff for Fyffe's injury?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

lets just say they're going to put the pies treatment of freeman to shame
The only reaso they were't is because of the tv rights deal requiring 9 games played each weekIf it continues like this, then questions need to be asked IMO why Essendon weren't taken off the fixture. Not sure why the cheats continue to be rewarded.
Exactly what I was thinkingAre they going to book surgeries now because they are tanking to get Sam Petrovski Seton?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The only reaso they were't is because of the tv rights deal requiring 9 games played each week
Surprised this hasn't been deleted yet....Reckon Essendon are just as much of a chance as Collingwood today, yet Pies are $1.38 and Essendon $3.15!?Line of 23.5 points also very generous.

If it continues like this, then questions need to be asked IMO why Essendon weren't taken off the fixture. Not sure why the cheats continue to be rewarded.







Haha, looks like I might have $10 less in my betting account than I did an hour ago. Collingwood unrecognisable from the team that's been playing for them in recent weeks and Essendon look overawed by the occasion.Surprised this hasn't been deleted yet....![]()
Surely you aren't blaming the medical staff for Fyffe's injury?
who else is to blame? why would you play your marque player with a plate still in his leg after a history of stress fractures that turned into a full blown fracture? especially with the severity of what can happen when a fracture occurs again around a plate?
But that decision wouldn't be coming from the club. The club employs doctors not specialists and specialists would make that decision. The club have to trust people who know about this sort of stuff and an every day sports doctor wouldn't have a clue no matter if they were the best in the world.
Most doctors know about the risks of peri-prosthetic fractures.
why wouldnt the decision be coming from the football club? they are ultimately the decision makers here
I am a doctor and I can tell you that that decision wouldn't have come unilaterally from the surgeon. He or she would have discussed the risks and benefits of a variety of paths, and Fyfe would have made the final decision, which would have been discussed with the club if Fyfe gave his consent to do so.