Post BF Upgrade Feedback - Click Here

Remove this Banner Ad

General AFL Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

sammm said:
gee i hope freo lose badly!

Port should be fired up, thinking how arrogant Freo is.
Click to expand...

And North, and the Dogs, in fact, stuff the lot of the final 8 except Richmond and the Eagles, sad state of affairs when one of the clubs deciding not to give a shit this week will probably win it.
 
Adelaide now whinging about potentially losing the chance at a home final due to North resting players. Here's an idea maybe win some more games earlier and you wouldn't have this problem. Unbelievable.
 
hayes said:
Adelaide now whinging about potentially losing the chance at a home final due to North resting players. Here's an idea maybe win some more games earlier and you wouldn't have this problem. Unbelievable.
Click to expand...
Idiots.
 
hayes said:
Adelaide now whinging about potentially losing the chance at a home final due to North resting players. Here's an idea maybe win some more games earlier and you wouldn't have this problem. Unbelievable.
Click to expand...
It's like some of the Richmond supporters being shitty at us for losing to Sydney last week.... I know some were being sarcastic, but there were others that were 100% serious...

Maybe if they had beaten Melbourne earlier in the year....
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

StFly said:
And North, and the Dogs, in fact, stuff the lot of the final 8 except Richmond and the Eagles, sad state of affairs when one of the clubs deciding not to give a shit this week will probably win it.
Click to expand...


Again umpiring standard rubbish Richmond protected species clearly 4 tackles by North all in front of goals none given.
Guess who is umpire advisor Wayne Campbell .. Cotchin gets 3 soft frees going other way.

Think you will find North have a few players playing for career.
Richmond get more soft frees around stoppages than any other club
 
Because the Victorian Cut-off point for disqualification on a first offence is 0.070.

https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/safety-and-road-rules/road-rules/penalties/drink-driving-penalties

hQmIvj0.png
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Stewart66 said:
Again umpiring standard rubbish Richmond protected species clearly 4 tackles by North all in front of goals none given.
Guess who is umpire advisor Wayne Campbell .. Cotchin gets 3 soft frees going other way.

Think you will find North have a few players playing for career.
Richmond get more soft frees around stoppages than any other club
Click to expand...

Didn't watch or listen to the game myself, auto assumed Richmond would win based on the fact that North rested 9 first picked players so there was no point to see one side trying and one side let down in the latter stages of the match by people gifted a game because reasons.

I would assume that North came out of the blocks all gung ho and full of flair, people raised various instances of "oh these boys are trying and it's great to see such a sprited display against the mighty Tigers" by junk time the Tigers would keep in touch, by half time they might even lead as these gung ho not yet ready/soon to be delisted/traded/etc players emulated a boy becoming a man and discovering the fairer sex and fatigued themselves, Richmond would then either extend or creep into the lead in the 3rd and there'd be a 6-10 goal victory to the Tigers as they training drilled around a half knackered half not trying North in the last.

And if Ziebell played, he probably removed his head and threw it into the barrier to concuss himself, since someone in a North jumper needs to be concussed at some point during the night.

People need to get over umpire bashing as well, needs to be more vitriol levied towards the rules committee who enshrined "if in the umpires opinion..." since it basically mandates that as soon as the umpire guesses and makes a decision, it's automatically right by the rules of the game, irregardless of what the umpire boss or anyone really says, because it's their opinion that it happened as they said it did.

Might be bullshit, you might have seen the bull, seen him grin a big cheesy grin an dump his load on your most prized possession, if this was on a footy field, and the umpire called it a chicken, it'd be a goddamn chicken and that bullshit would be currency to buy yourself a seat in aisle 23 because bureaucracy!
 
StFly said:
Didn't watch or listen to the game myself, auto assumed Richmond would win based on the fact that North rested 9 first picked players so there was no point to see one side trying and one side let down in the latter stages of the match by people gifted a game because reasons.

I would assume that North came out of the blocks all gung ho and full of flair, people raised various instances of "oh these boys are trying and it's great to see such a sprited display against the mighty Tigers" by junk time the Tigers would keep in touch, by half time they might even lead as these gung ho not yet ready/soon to be delisted/traded/etc players emulated a boy becoming a man and discovering the fairer sex and fatigued themselves, Richmond would then either extend or creep into the lead in the 3rd and there'd be a 6-10 goal victory to the Tigers as they training drilled around a half knackered half not trying North in the last.

And if Ziebell played, he probably removed his head and threw it into the barrier to concuss himself, since someone in a North jumper needs to be concussed at some point during the night.

People need to get over umpire bashing as well, needs to be more vitriol levied towards the rules committee who enshrined "if in the umpires opinion..." since it basically mandates that as soon as the umpire guesses and makes a decision, it's automatically right by the rules of the game, irregardless of what the umpire boss or anyone really says, because it's their opinion that it happened as they said it did.

Might be bullshit, you might have seen the bull, seen him grin a big cheesy grin an dump his load on your most prized possession, if this was on a footy field, and the umpire called it a chicken, it'd be a goddamn chicken and that bullshit would be currency to buy yourself a seat in aisle 23 because bureaucracy!
Click to expand...

Should correct comments from last one umpire Simon Meredith umpires well hence why he has done several
Grand Finals the other 2 no comment.

P.s unusual for fox footy panel to make commentary about umpiring decisions in 1st half is all I will say.
 
hayes said:
Staker didn't deserve a farewell game anyway.

#thingsdermwouldsay
Click to expand...

Brian Taylor said on MMM last week that 250 should be the minimum for a 'farewell game'.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Brisbane winning awards Carlton the spoon (barring the unlikely upset of Carlton defeating Hawthorn). Feels good, I will feel sorry for Carlton and Essendon when they both have 27 times more spoons than flags.
 
FMD didn't anyone just hear Bomber Thompson going through the Swans line-up? I think he's had his quota of coke for the nig...I mean week.
 
Hey Guys, anyone know the Prelim situation? Hypothetically West Coast and Freo both win, are both Prelims at Subi or one in Melbourne?

I always thought one had to be in Melbourne but a West Coast's players brother told me otherwise. I am sure he's wrong.
 
Jezzarayman said:
Hey Guys, anyone know the Prelim situation? Hypothetically West Coast and Freo both win, are both Prelims at Subi or one in Melbourne?

I always thought one had to be in Melbourne but a West Coast's players brother told me otherwise. I am sure he's wrong.
Click to expand...
They'd both be in Perth. The prelim in Melbourne thing was a one off 10 years ago because the AFL had to play a certain amount of matches at the G and hadn't met it yet.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

T
News St Kilda Media Thread 2026
2
Replies
26
Views
3K
thequarry
thequarry
sammm
  • Locked
News 2025 St. Kilda Media Thread
105 106 107 108 109
Replies
3K
Views
243K
StCicatriz
StCicatriz

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom