Erm yes. lol. People don't support free speech based on whether or not someone criticises Nauru or not. Jesus Christ.
General Political Chat
- Thread starter hamohawk1
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Erm yes. lol. People don't support free speech based on whether or not someone criticises Nauru or not. Jesus Christ.
What's that supposed to be? I feel like I've jumped down a badger hole of someone trying to be too clever by half in their disdain for someone that shares differing political opinions.
NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
Most people would hit google BEFORE jumping in to have a sook
I'll be here when you get back.
Prettier but just as dumb. Wtf is the law she is taking about? The law didn’t save taxi drivers from UBER
NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
Last edited:
NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
Just watching ‘independent’ MPs hand wringing on Q and A about government policy, when at least two of them could bring on an election as soon as the house sits
‘Sensible centre’ indeed
‘Sensible centre’ indeed
CakeEater
Brownlow Medallist
Sorry, what? I literally just said free speech does not have limitations on whether Nauru is being discussed or not, lol.
OK that you mis-read my post...how on earth did the 3 people that liked it, also do the same? Sheep groupthink here lol.
OK googled:
Wikipedia: "Neckbeard" is a pejorative term and stereotype for men who exhibit characteristics such as social awkwardness, underachievement or pretentiousness.
Considering the statement had come from a One Nation candidate, espousing policy aimed at One Nation voters, I hardly think ON voters in Qld or Western Sydney would be classed as "pretentious" or "socially awkward". More like blabbering loud-mouth bogans.
Seems like you tried to shoe-horn an insult into a discussion, which didn't fit, in order to simply label those on the other side as "losers".
Maggie5
Moderator
- Moderator
- #1,062
Literally? I don't think so.
Maybe you should re-read what you wrote or maybe you mis-read my post as I presume you are aware that this government does every thing it can to restrict those that have worked on Nauru and even deported those who have tried to speak out.
So do you applaud his award? (In simple terms a yes or no will suffice).
NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
I've just re-read what you wrote. You asked whether free speech advocates would applaud this. I directly responded to your question by saying yes, that support for free speech is not based on whether someone is or is not criticising Nauru, lol.
This is the most bizarre convo I've had on this site. More bizarre is how 3 people liked your obvious mistake of a post attacking me in the first place, lol.
pressing like is free speech
Yes and that's why I didn't demand the domain owner of this website delete the function of doing so, lol. I just highlighted how sheep-like 3 other people must be!
NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
This wench would rock up to the opening of a *en envelope !!!
And here's me thinking THE AGE OF ENTITLEMENT was over.....
And here's me thinking THE AGE OF ENTITLEMENT was over.....
Crankyhawk
Brownlow Medallist
I read his reply as being ok with the doctor getting the award, and that free speech doesn’t have limitations depending on topic. Not sure how you flipped it the other way.
Exactly...very weird on the part of Maggie5.
Or another way of putting it would be
Howard sold off a bunch of enterprises that gave the government a constant income - to pay off a debt
Sorta like if you owned a big company that made you 3 million a year
And bought a house worth 20 million - but decided you didnt want to have that debt so you sold your company to pay it off.
NSWCROW
Make me an Admin!
Something something labors fault
Similar threads
