- Jan 12, 2011
- 25,397
- 35,576
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Wouldn't it be a hoot if the rumour about his liking for lady-boys turned out to be true
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahh look someone attacking someone over a personal characteristic. I guess using your logic you have no trouble with people using homophobic slogans towards gay people like you?Inshallah the fat campaigner will lose his seat at the next election anyway and he can f*** off the Philippines and do whatever he does there on a full time basis. I'm sure Duterte could use a go getter like our George.
Was t aware that being gay was a choice.Ahh look someone attacking someone over a personal characteristic. I guess using your logic you have no trouble with people using homophobic slogans towards gay people like you?
Actually both can be choices or both can be not choices.Was t aware that being gay was a choice.
Being a fat, bigotted, corrupt hypocrite is
The claims against George must be more serious than I thought if you are choosing this petty line of distractionAhh look someone attacking someone over a personal characteristic. I guess using your logic you have no trouble with people using homophobic slogans towards gay people like you?
I don't know how supported the claims against Christiensen actually are. I am simply pointing out the rank hypocrisy of this poster.The claims against George must be more serious than I thought if you are choosing this petty line of distraction
Well seeings as there was no rank hypocrisy from the poster, it's clear that you are just trying to derail the thread. And succeeding, it must be noted.I don't know how supported the claims against Christiensen actually are. I am simply pointing out the rank hypocrisy of this poster.
Yes there was. You can't suddenly abuse and call someone names when it suits you but then bitch and moan when it doesn't. The said poster has a history of doing this and has had their hypocrisy highlighted. Entirely relevant to this thread.Well seeings as there was no rank hypocrisy from the poster, it's clear that you are just trying to derail the thread. And succeeding, it must be noted.
Pretty sure "fat campaigner" is a fair description of the halfwit that is GeorgeYes there was. You can't suddenly abuse and call someone names when it suits you but then bitch and moan when it doesn't. The said poster has a history of doing this and has had their hypocrisy highlighted. Entirely relevant to this thread.
Inshallah the fat campaigner will lose his seat at the next election anyway and he can f*** off the Philippines and do whatever he does there on a full time basis. I'm sure Duterte could use a go getter like our George.
More than that too.He gets a pension if he gets voted out, he can go and live like a king over there.
Inshallah the fat campaigner will lose his seat at the next election anyway and he can f*** off the Philippines and do whatever he does there on a full time basis. I'm sure Duterte could use a go getter like our George.
He will need his pension, I dont think the dumb, fat,campaigner has any skill set that can be used in the real world
so if someone is gay and I think they are a campaigner for example you wouldn't have a problem with me calling them gay campaigner?As a fat man I have no problem with it. Why do you?
Good idea, if you can't hack it in the real world invent an imaginary one!
How could you recognise they are gay if you were to call them that? It would be a problem if they weren't.so if someone is gay and I think they are a campaigner for example you wouldn't have a problem with me calling them gay campaigner?
It just seems their is a nice double standard on slurs and their type from some that is all.
Because if I knew that they were gay and they were a campaigner I could call them a gay campaigner couldn't I?How could you recognise they are gay if you were to call them that? It would be a problem if they weren't.
It is easier to recognise someone as being fat, obese or overweight.
are you disputing George is a fat campaigner ?Because if I knew that they were gay and they were a campaigner I could call them a gay campaigner couldn't I?
Also people get called gay campaigner who aren't actually gay as an insult anyhow although irrelevant to the initial point I was making.
Not the point I was making. Christensen is fat/overweight/obese that is a fact as it is obvious but I have no idea who is gay unless they disclose it.Because if I knew that they were gay and they were a campaigner I could call them a gay campaigner couldn't I?
Also people get called gay campaigner who aren't actually gay as an insult anyhow although irrelevant to the initial point I was making.
What difference does it make whether it is obvious or not? By your logic then we can abuse people without question through the use of negative characteristics when the characteristic is noticeable but not otherwise.Not the point I was making. Christensen is fat/overweight/obese that is a fact as it is obvious but I have no idea who is gay unless they disclose it.
Maybe it is campaigner that you should be objecting to? This could also be true.
Sorry calling someone a gay campaigner doesn't have any relation to whether they have been disowned or murdered or jailed for being gay.No one was or is jailed or disowned or murdered for being fat. And being fat is a lifestyle choice.
If someone can't see that difference then they don't have the intellect to bother responding to them.