Perhaps, I don't think we got screwed for Bundy, I mean he definitely wasn't worth a top 10 pick, so he was maybe worth a few picks better, pretty marginal really. Plus, was OOC and gave us one club to deal with, Brisbane didn't have much else to offer and there were obviously off-field issues that we still don't really know the extent of - he had to go and we had very little leverage. I think the club would've had a fair idea of his injury issues also, he's had the back issues persistently while at Geelong, those issue aren't likely just going away, especially when they show signs at that young of an age.
Agree Stanley wasn't worth p21 at the time but he filled a position we desperately needed, appeared to have solid upside and was probably the best available for us - I think it was a pretty astute trade, they knew it was probably overs at the time looking at it as an isolated trade but he was still contracted but we got what we needed and part of the puzzle was getting a good ruckman on the list, that had to happen and the upside looked very favourable, which they made a good assessment of IMO.
Would you have preferred we took that p21 to the draft and didn't have him on the list or that we went after a need that was critical to us and paid a bit extra to fill it with a talented big man that was still contracted?