rocker_oz33
TheBrownDog
Thats pakington street your talking about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Given we didn't take worpel I'd say track record says we don't reachCan’t see us using 14 on him. 17 maybe. 24 definitely. Do you risk missing him altogether and take someone else at 17 if you rate them higher seeing he’s a local boy?
The Wells philosophy in those days was to pick the best available - even if I meant taking a punt on a selection that had slid due to injury in the immediate TAC season. (Landed us a beauty with Joel and a very, very good player in Trav). Was also okay with recruiting a very skinny framed player (again, worked well with Mackie).
Hindsight is always an easy thing, but the selection above were the exceptions. I really think Lang never fully recovered from horrifically bad leg break and Nakia missed all but one game due at knee injury. Brown was very, very skinny for a young key forward or defender this usually means a season or two longer for development. They are also at higher risk. By memory Mitch suffered a dislocated shoulder nearly immediately then of course a horrific break. Even Smedts (albeit not a key position player) struggled in part due to the big gap on strength.
I think you have to be both strategic and tactical with your top picks - meaning you know they are likely for the long term but you also have to see that they are going to have good first years, which means no chronic injuries and no years behind on strength. Take the punt on later picks but not your top.
(I also think that the top pick has to have multiple attributes - Mitch really has only two - well timed, good leads and a very straight long kick. He has a great tank now, but these days that and two attributes is not enough to guarantee a long career).
I'd rather Street back than Fort any day of the week
Rod Blake
Peter Street
Darcy Fort
In that order for Geelong's beanpoles
But top 10's are different altogether, which is why we should trade up
Kemp to comeI think it should be a very rare player that we overlook injury history for. Joel Selwood at the time of draft was that sort of exception. Touted by many as the best player in the draft and slide to seven off the back of his knee injury. But that is an extremely rare example of when I think we should be okay with that. We've taken that risk far too many times be it Varcoe, Thurlow, Smedts, Cockatoo or Lang.
I guess this answered my question today... No Rookies have been Retained or Promoted at this stage by the Club.
GEELONG CATS
Draft picks post-trade period: 14, 17, 24, 36, 93
Who has left: Jordan Cunico (delisted), Jamaine Jones (delisted), Scott Selwood (delisted), Tim Kelly (West Coast Eagles), Zac Smith (Gold Coast Suns), Wylie Buzza (delisted)
Who has arrived: Jack Steven (St Kilda), Josh Jenkins (Adelaide Crows)
Promoted rookies: tbc
Retained rookies: tbc
AFL Off-Season Central: Every club’s ins, outs, delistings, retirements, trades, draft picks, recruits, rookies
Off-Season Central: Every move by every AFL club heading into 2020www.foxsports.com.au
Yeah just been delisted.
3 and 38 to 40How many rookies can you have on a list?
How many senior players can you have?
Sorry for the dumb question
How many rookies can you have on a list?
How many senior players can you have?
Sorry for the dumb question
Don't have high hopes for Simpson & Zuthrie.3 and 38 to 40
Already have Simpson, Zach Guthrie and Atkins on rookie list
Atkins will stay, the other two are dependent on how many picks we use in the draft, as is Henderson
Thanks for the explanation.Category B rookies - maximum of 3
Senior/Main list - between 38 & 40
Category A rookies (now redundant based on selection eligibility rules) - no minimum, but a maximum of 4 to 6 depending on senior list size
Between the senior list & category A rookie list a team can have a maximum of 44 players. If a team wishes to run with 44 players the breakdown is,
Senior/rookie list:
38/6
39/5
40/4
But, a team may choose to go with 42 or 43 players on their list - gives the option of elevating a Cat B rookie, preseason supplement selection or a selection in the mid-season draft without needing a long term injury.
Vdubs will be beside himself with joy over your Blakey comment. And Peter Street was one of the Doggies greats.I'd rather Street back than Fort any day of the week
Rod Blake
Peter Street
Darcy Fort
In that order for Geelong's beanpoles
But top 10's are different altogether, which is why we should trade up
I think Z.Guthrie's time is up and I also think they will delist Henderson. The fair thing would have been to do it some time back to let other sides know of his availability. North Melbourne could do with a Scott Thompson replacement for example.Don't have high hopes for Simpson & Zuthrie.
Hopefully we delist both
Rod Blake is a really good example of the risks and benefits of a taking a talented beanpole - he was a very good player with some outstanding games (saw him mark everything and kick six goals at Moorabbin one game) in the last few years of his career but before that would rarely break out of double figures in possessions and like his son was little more than a centre bounce ruck. Geelong was lucky that Sam Newman was such a great ruck in the 70s so they could persist with developing Rod.
Thanks for the correction on the rookies. Had no idea you could have up to six of themCategory B rookies - maximum of 3
Senior/Main list - between 38 & 40
Category A rookies (now redundant based on selection eligibility rules) - no minimum, but a maximum of 4 to 6 depending on senior list size
Between the senior list & category A rookie list a team can have a maximum of 44 players. If a team wishes to run with 44 players the breakdown is,
Senior/rookie list:
38/6
39/5
40/4
But, a team may choose to go with 42 or 43 players on their list, with a max of 38/39 on the senior list - gives the option of elevating a Cat B rookie, preseason supplement selection or a selection in the mid-season draft without needing a long term injury.
Good summation. While Blake was good though, he was extra goodBlakey ( Rod ) had basically one outstanding year with the Cats - 1980 - from memory he won the Best and Fairest - pretty good effort doing that - because Geel were minor premiers that year ( winning the b/f when your way down the ladder isnt as good in my opinion) . In 81 he was pretty good as well
However in 82 he lost all form - and was in the 2nds at times - i can remember a game out at Carlton - last qtr of the 2nds - Blakey has kicked a ball ( outer side ) way out on the full by about 30 metres !!- and a group of old time Blues supporters roared out - thats why your in the 2nds Blakey - much to the humour of the crowd
Knightmare did his phantom draft and had us picking up deven robertson josh worrel and dylan williams.
I would be happy with that. Robertson will be a star
If we have to listen to.. but but we was gonna take him with our next pick (for 2 years again) .........Lots of potential with Robertson.. potential to play from early on, potential gun mid , potential captain and the potential to have west coast all over us again for another player..
Knightmare did his phantom draft and had us picking up deven robertson josh worrel and dylan williams.
I would be happy with that. Robertson will be a star