Sydney wont offer that. 9 and 25 maybe.
what will they get for Jones .. pick in the 20's ?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Sydney wont offer that. 9 and 25 maybe.
Sydney wont offer that. 9 and 25 maybe.
Justhaving a look ..Sydney have a couple of Kids coming thru next year as well.. so maybe they will want their FR picks ... what does Jones get them?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Its probably not the best year for the draft... oh wellA round 2 pick for Zak Jones seems like a great deal. He has some deficiencies but he’s a good player. I wish we were getting in there. I know we were keen in his draft year his pace and aggression would be handy.
But it seems we are not in the race anyway.
Listening to Wells on Friday it seems we will concentrate mostly on the draft. I certainly don’t mind that if we get some good picks for Kelly. If we take Kelly out and don’t add anyone to replace him it’ll be hard to see us doing as well as this year.
But perhaps improvement from within can bring enough to the team.
Who would like Jamie Elliot in our forward line?
Yeah that can even work if playing Kruger..... Which still allowing 2 big tall targets going 50... Lol.i will compriseFair enough, the gap between his best and worst is just far too big for an experienced player IMO.
I don’t mind your idea of an extra tall next year though. I’d be playing Kreuger instead of Abbott personally, we clearly lacked marking targets up front.

Heck yeah.Who would like Jamie Elliot in our forward line?
Heck yeah.
But I think his $ may be out of reach, considering we gave Taylor and GAJ 1 year deals.
I think the strategy is to add via draft this off-season, and maybe 1 or 2 top up players this year, like Jack Steven or if we can broker straight swaps for perhaps a forward line player, and trade out a defender.
Then go hard for Jeremy Cameron as FA next season.
A round 2 pick for Zak Jones seems like a great deal. He has some deficiencies but he’s a good player. I wish we were getting in there. I know we were keen in his draft year his pace and aggression would be handy.
But it seems we are not in the race anyway.
Listening to Wells on Friday it seems we will concentrate mostly on the draft. I certainly don’t mind that if we get some good picks for Kelly. If we take Kelly out and don’t add anyone to replace him it’ll be hard to see us doing as well as this year.
But perhaps improvement from within can bring enough to the team.
You mean in our medical room??Who would like Jamie Elliot in our forward line?
Wouldn’t be the first injury prone forward we’ve had. He plays more than cocky.You mean in our medical room??
Don't get me wrong he has talent in spades but i would rather hit the draft than pay him 400k-500k or so for maybe 11 games a yearWouldn’t be the first injury prone forward we’ve had. He plays more than cocky.
Not that we are going for him but i wouldn’t be against Elliot. Has some serious talent.
Not sure if mentioned but there’s an article on foxsports (trade preview) that says Saints want a pick in the 20s for Steven.
If this is true it might explain Wells saying talks were a long way off. I don’t want to even trade 36 for him!
Agreed with you there, would depend on how he went with his medical. If the club thought they could get the best out of him I’d be all for it!Don't get me wrong he has talent in spades but i would rather hit the draft than pay him 400k-500k or so for maybe 11 games a year
As our list stands right now, I'd be playing Stanley as No.1 ruck, Ratugolea as 2nd ruck/forward, Hawkins FF and Krueger at CHF.Yeah that can even work if playing Kruger..... Which still allowing 2 big tall targets going 50... Lol.i will comprise![]()
Sick Miers/Dahl/Atkins etc at their feet and we have a nice forward lineAs our list stands right now, I'd be playing Stanley as No.1 ruck, Ratugolea as 2nd ruck/forward, Hawkins FF and Krueger at CHF.
That gives us plenty of marking power, athleticism and if one of them gets injured then we've got cover during a game, rather than ******* up our whole structure by moving Blicavs away from FB.
Shit yeah, plus both our rucks can play forward if need be, but they have to work on their goal kicking.Sick Miers/Dahl/Atkins etc at their feet and we have a nice forward line
Yeah but you're not losing a forward who can apply pressure, you're gaining an extra marking option as well as adding to the ruck, which has been our biggest weakness for 8 years.I think adding Krueger while Hawkins and Ratugolea are in the team takes too much away from our forward-line pressure. For me, the forward-line pressure was the best thing our team did in 2019 and the major reason we saw a resurgence rather than the expected drop off.
Yeah but you're not losing a forward who can apply pressure, you're gaining an extra marking option as well as adding to the ruck, which has been our biggest weakness for 8 years.
You'd replace one of the defenders to bring him in so really it would serve two purposes.
Have you actually seen Krueger play?I think adding Krueger while Hawkins and Ratugolea are in the team takes too much away from our forward-line pressure. For me, the forward-line pressure was the best thing our team did in 2019 and the major reason we saw a resurgence rather than the expected drop off.