Would take for butters
Realistically no chance.. Maybe we can talk about someone like Hayes ... Not sure but the absolutely most we get is a R2
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would take for butters
To be honest with his injury history he'd be steak knives in whatever we give them on a trade for Butters or Duursma. Zero chance at getting Rozee. He's already being put on all their brandingOr Rozee or Duursma... All three are gold.
With Duursma could get some loose change with that.
Agreed. Not sure my level of sarcasm translates on a forumRealistically no chance.. Maybe we can talk about someone like Hayes ... Not sure but the absolutely most we get is a R2
Agreed. Not sure my level of sarcasm translates on a forum
Spot on. We should have 4 on our list at a minimum. 2 genuine small forwards are not enoughfrom P.O. "Hes good and out of contract but we have a decent lot of small forwards...if he improved his tank to play wing id be keen".
IMO Specialist small forwards are more important than ever.
We have three smalls up forward at AFL level. Miers, Dahl, Atkins. Two are there for their tackling / pressure. Only one of them is a specialist small forward.
Tarca is just getting some traction in VFL but unless Bolton has some issues or would be too expensive, I would put him into the basket with the two specialist small forwards we have : Tarca, Miers (and Bolton).
Back in the day when he wanted to be draftedApparently Port are sniffing around Cockatoo ....
Oh dear we are going to get well shafted on this oneBack in the day when he wanted to be drafted
https://amp.ntnews.com.au/sport/loc...y/news-story/27cf2ac6be5d860d5fd2713e854a3ce8
IV got a very funny feeling he will ask for a trade, ( that's just gut feel, hope I'm wrong ) I can only hope he can get threw injurys as we know he can be a X Factor.
View attachment 661889
I'll ask you this... If he did ask for a trade... What would we get in return?Oh dear we are going to get well shafted on this one
This one will end in tears if he goes.Oh dear we are going to get well shafted on this one
Maybe, but i also think a big part of finding someone to trade in for unders is making the player really want to come, and to do that you need to really need them.
Consider this year. We pick up Dahlhaus and Rohan for pick 61 and a minor amount of cap. Why does Dahlhaus want us? Because he's a natural pressure forward being played as a mid at his old club. How appreciated do you think he felt there? Rohan being told to just clear space for buddy? We had no pressure forwarfs and Dahlhaus wanted to come to fill a Dahlhaus shaped hole. Rohan came to fill a Rohan shaped hole. If you go back to 2015 and look at the cats midfield you realize that Dangerfield came to fill a Dangerfield shaped hole.
If we try to trade for a Hawkins replacement now we're trying to get them into the VFL side until Hawkins retires. Not sure I'd lead with that in a sales pitch.
Consider the Lynch trade as something we'd want to replicate. Lynch looked at the Richmond game style and saw a flood of entries and only one tall forward getting on the end of them.
My thinking is that if we're going the be a good trade destination for a kpf we need first, a job opening, and second we need to increase our total entries.
So for me if we're looking at trade target for 2020 then it's to fill a Kelly shaped hole. If nothing presents and we have two firsts then i would say best 180+cm mids for both.
Got to say, Parish does nothing for me. Can’t see any real weapons that he brings to AFL level. Reckon we can get a better mid elsewhere.
Realistically no chance.. Maybe we can talk about someone like Hayes ... Not sure but the absolutely most we get is a R2
Id prefer not to trade him but OOC and injured wed get peanuts like with McCarthy. Rozee Duursma and Butters would be untouchable. Hayes and a swap of picks (say r4 for r3) in our favour is about the best youd get and id reluctantly take that. Id ask about someone like Atley or Drew but i doubt theyd do that.
Its not Hogan they are missing...
Off field nuffy. No one wanted to touch him.Im sure there are quite a few clubs asking their RM... why didnt we draft Sydney Stack ? For him to be totally passed over says a lot about how clubs dont rate players totally by what they see on field.
Off field nuffy. No one wanted to touch him.
Based on the Lincoln McCarthy and Gary Rohan trades about pick 60. Would bot be happy about that oneI'll ask you this... If he did ask for a trade... What would we get in return?
Off field nuffy. No one wanted to touch him.
Based on the Lincoln McCarthy and Gary Rohan trades about pick 60. Would bot be happy about that one
That's... ... ouch!One club’s list manager said: “He’s at the lower end in terms of his IQ off-field, but there was never any doubting his IQ on-field.
“You have to be able to sit back and ask, ‘Does the talent stack up and is the off-field stuff going to affect the on-field?
“You then have to assess your own club. Have we got the resources to give this a chance?
“This is where Richmond have done really well. They’ve clearly put things in place to minimise that risk.”
Could be a long list of outs at the end of this year.It may be that he goes for a pick we may not even want to use... how many spots will we have this year... we have R1,R2,R3 this year ... and if we get a couple of picks in for Kelly something in the 60's may well be useless.
No way would we be getting rid of Bews.Could be a long list of outs at the end of this year.
Scott Selwood and Zac Smith would be certain departures. Harry and GAJ are possible retirements (though I think Gary will go on). It's tough to see how Bews and Henderson will get back in the side and they are out of contract at the end of the year, and there's possible departures in Buzza, Jones and Cunico.