You mean the one post I made which thanked you for your work but pointed out your logic was flawed and then you agreed with me? I thought that was a good time to let it go.
As for posting facts, you posted they got Boyd as they thought they were 5 years from competing. How is that possibly a fact? It's not. You don't know how internally they rated their list. They made the finals the following year and the year after won the GF with Boyd playing a big part. Those are the facts, not your opinion.
Now will you accept that and move on?
As for my running debate with pdub, I again spoke facts, Mackay played one good qtr. I then had to argue that an imaginary cooling role didn't exist, which it didnt.
The one where you didn't win the argument and tried to move the goalposts and I said you could run the data yourself?
I gave up then, because even when presented with empirical data you don't concede that you were wrong. It's foolish debating anything with you because you're stubborn beyond any belief.
Even now - you change things again. I've posted three times the facts - captain quits, previous captain quits, one of their best players quits, their coach gets sacked, and they choose to trade for a 20 year old.
I can't be bothered arguing with someone so blind. You refuse to listen or consider anything suggested by others.
If you think the facts I've listed are evidence of a team that believes they're about to compete for a flag, then nothing I can say will every change that.