The one where you didn't win the argument and tried to move the goalposts and I said you could run the data yourself?
I gave up then, because even when presented with empirical data you don't concede that you were wrong. It's foolish debating anything with you because you're stubborn beyond any belief.
Even now - you change things again. I've posted three times the facts - captain quits, previous captain quits, one of their best players quits, their coach gets sacked, and they choose to trade for a 20 year old.
I can't be bothered arguing with someone so blind. You refuse to listen or consider anything suggested by others.
If you think the facts I've listed are evidence of a team that believes they're about to compete for a flag, then nothing I can say will every change that.
I gave up then, because even when presented with empirical data you don't concede that you were wrong. It's foolish debating anything with you because you're stubborn beyond any belief.
Even now - you change things again. I've posted three times the facts - captain quits, previous captain quits, one of their best players quits, their coach gets sacked, and they choose to trade for a 20 year old.
I can't be bothered arguing with someone so blind. You refuse to listen or consider anything suggested by others.
If you think the facts I've listed are evidence of a team that believes they're about to compete for a flag, then nothing I can say will every change that.
You said they brought him in as they thought they weren't going to be contenders for 5 years? Did you say that or not? How is your opinion a fact? It's shown up as dumb considering they won the flag 2 years later!!!!!!!!
