Gibson

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

HawkMongrel said:
It's unfair on Adelaide, yes. No question.

That doesn't mean that they should make the same error again.
Click to expand...
Funny how there's a Hawks fan or two posting this every week.

Sure it's unfair that Hawkins went, but Lewis should obviously get off.
Sure it's unfair that Sloane went, but Gibson should obviously get off.

Etc, etc, etc.

Of course if the MRP and tribunal actually took these things seriously, Hodge would still be serving time for attempting to turn Wingard into a paraplegic. The most dangerous act I've ever seen in the AFL.
 
caitsith01 said:
Funny how there's a Hawks fan or two posting this every week.

Sure it's unfair that Hawkins went, but Lewis should obviously get off.
Sure it's unfair that Sloane went, but Gibson should obviously get off.

Etc, etc, etc.

Of course if the MRP and tribunal actually took these things seriously, Hodge would still be serving time for attempting to turn Wingard into a paraplegic. The most dangerous act I've ever seen in the AFL.
Click to expand...

lol put the pipe down pal.
 
Banyo Bloods said:
Because when McEvoy did the same thing to Ziebell this year there wasn’t even a report.
Click to expand...
You mean where BB put his arms out and lowered Ziebell back onto his feet but had a free paid against him for a dangerous tackle?
 
Hawks fans......we know you are sick of hearing fans complain about your treatment/favouritism but how many times have things fallen your way and other clubs get screwed. Sometimes it just happens that way but by this stage the most one eyed hawks fan must realise deep down that you should have herpes from the amount of kisses to the dick your club has had.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

VFL13 said:
Hawks fans......we know you are sick of hearing fans complain about your treatment/favouritism but how many times have things fallen your way and other clubs get screwed. Sometimes it just happens that way but by this stage the most one eyed hawks fan must realise deep down that you should have herpes from the amount of kisses to the dick your club has had.
Click to expand...

You're obviously a pseudo-neutral with confirmation bias.

How did I go Hawks fans?
 
Gralin said:
You mean where BB put his arms out and lowered Ziebell back onto his feet but had a free paid against him for a dangerous tackle?
Click to expand...

Take off the brown and gold glasses. My point was that the report was laughable in context. Have a look at them both they are exactly the same due to the height of the tackler
 
Banyo Bloods said:
Take off the brown and gold glasses. My point was that the report was laughable in context. Have a look at them both they are exactly the same due to the height of the tackler
Click to expand...
If you think the BB incident is the same you probably need your eyes checked.
That doesn't mean I agree with the fine but they are not exactly the same, not even close.
 
Contact between Hawthorn’s Josh Gibson and Collingwood’s Levi Greenwood from the second quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. The ball was kicked forward to Greenwood in the Collingwood forward line. Gibson has his eyes on the ball at all times and is committed in the air to the contest, with contact inevitable. Gibson made grazing contact with his forearm to the side of Greenwood’s head and a free kick was paid at the time for the high contact. Greenwood was able to take his kick at the time and it was the view of the panel that while the contact was worthy of a free kick, it was a genuine attempt to spoil (like the hundreds of other unscrutinised incidents this year). The MRP's view is that the mass hysteria of the usual pack of headf**ked wowsers (including ignorant SEN commentators) with no idea about AFL football has wasted everyone's time again.
 
Banyo Bloods said:
Because when McEvoy did the same thing to Ziebell this year there wasn’t even a report.
Click to expand...

When Ziebell jumped at McEvoy, who caught him and dropped him on the ground rather than slammed him on the ground in a tackle?

Is that what Naismith did with Houly? He should definitely contest it. Would be crazy to hand over $1,000 when he saved Houly from a serious injury.
 
La Vache said:
Mrp get another one spot on. They has been one of the afls success stories of 2016.
Click to expand...


The sloane one was a joke, too much of the players injury taken into account, but overall improvement
 
asanque said:
Contact between Hawthorn’s Josh Gibson and Collingwood’s Levi Greenwood from the second quarter of Sunday’s match was assessed. The ball was kicked forward to Greenwood in the Collingwood forward line. Gibson has his eyes on the ball at all times and is committed in the air to the contest, with contact inevitable. Gibson made grazing contact with his forearm to the side of Greenwood’s head and a free kick was paid at the time for the high contact. Greenwood was able to take his kick at the time and it was the view of the panel that while the contact was worthy of a free kick, it was a genuine attempt to spoil (like the hundreds of other unscrutinised incidents this year). The MRP's view is that the mass hysteria of the usual pack of headf**ked wowsers (including ignorant SEN commentators) with no idea about AFL football has wasted everyone's time again.
Click to expand...


Id like to think you did copy and paste the whole thing fom an offical presser
 
HairyO said:
When Ziebell jumped at McEvoy, who caught him and dropped him on the ground rather than slammed him on the ground in a tackle?

Is that what Naismith did with Houly? He should definitely contest it. Would be crazy to hand over $1,000 when he saved Houly from a serious injury.
Click to expand...

Exactly the same, but you wouldn't contest a fine on the eve of finals unless you were wearing a brown and gold jumper of course

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top