All three - Gillard-Craig Thomson and Obeid are up to their necks in corruption, yet somehow Gillard has earned the right to lead their party. Why not give Thomson a go at the top job? It is a merry go round of ex-union officials/mates who lead the Labor Party.
I would disagree with your comment. I don't think Gillard is fit to lead the Labor Party. Her antics in parliament only further demonstrate the bile and muck that she brings to politics. "Smear and mud buckets" etc- I swear on Thursday she mentioned those words 50 times. How many times were Julie Bishop's questions answered? none.
What qualifications has Gillard brought to the job prior to entering politics? She is qualified in setting up fraudulent funds that distributed fraudulent money to her mates (oh, apparently she didn't know it was happening/i believe fish jump to the moon too). She cost her company a major account and yet somehow she is fit to lead this country because she was deceptive and lies well...see a pattern here with her job as "prime minister".
Gillard stands for govt regulation on the media, Abbott stands for a free media, Gillard stands for bureacracy and govt controls on YOUR life, Abbott stands for individual freedoms, Gillard stands for destroying farmers lives along the murray river, Abott doesn't. I would say there are quite a few differences.
I would disagree with your comment. I don't think Gillard is fit to lead the Labor Party. Her antics in parliament only further demonstrate the bile and muck that she brings to politics. "Smear and mud buckets" etc- I swear on Thursday she mentioned those words 50 times. How many times were Julie Bishop's questions answered? none.
What qualifications has Gillard brought to the job prior to entering politics? She is qualified in setting up fraudulent funds that distributed fraudulent money to her mates (oh, apparently she didn't know it was happening/i believe fish jump to the moon too). She cost her company a major account and yet somehow she is fit to lead this country because she was deceptive and lies well...see a pattern here with her job as "prime minister".
Gillard stands for govt regulation on the media, Abbott stands for a free media, Gillard stands for bureacracy and govt controls on YOUR life, Abbott stands for individual freedoms, Gillard stands for destroying farmers lives along the murray river, Abott doesn't. I would say there are quite a few differences.

