Gaming Goallineblitz

fuey

Statistically Impossible
Joined
Mar 9, 2005
Posts
5,319
Likes
4,092
Location
Homeless
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Re: Cool Sim Site

First, players are leveled up to the max for playoffs. My boys need some playing time as reward.

Second, McLegend will be #36. Aampman will be #92, and Atoa will be #56. Gringos will be #21, also.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

GG.exe

Killer on the Road ™
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Posts
96,629
Likes
51,244
Location
In every girl's wet dream
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Ravens-Raiders-Dolphins
Re: Cool Sim Site

camsmith...great film break down. We were set at 80% run inside. But given what you said, I might have to change it at the last minute to 50-50%....would you think that was ok that kind of percentage? What are their OLB's like? I thought their DTs/NTs were shit and running inside would hurt them more? That their OLBs were good at defending against outside rushes.

Please advise.
 

camsmith

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 25, 2005
Posts
13,026
Likes
379
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Denver Broncos, Storm, Pompey
Re: Cool Sim Site

camsmith...great film break down. We were set at 80% run inside. But given what you said, I might have to change it at the last minute to 50-50%....would you think that was ok that kind of percentage? What are their OLB's like? I thought their DTs/NTs were shit and running inside would hurt them more? That their OLBs were good at defending against outside rushes.

Please advise.
It's a tough call, you do make a good point on the DT/NT, but last game they filled the holes well. Looking at the stats though their OLB's got the most tackles.

Given I didn't watch the 2nd half, we should give the original tactics the benefit. Maybe only increase outside running by 10%. Have it 70% run inside just since you make a good point re their OLB.

So 70% run inside 30% outside if thats fine with you and the O-coach.

Will be interesting to see the review.

Have you guys settled on the pass distance %?
 

GG.exe

Killer on the Road ™
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Posts
96,629
Likes
51,244
Location
In every girl's wet dream
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Ravens-Raiders-Dolphins
Re: Cool Sim Site

Also, do you think I should change the pass to WR-TE-FB-HB percentage?

Currently it's 70-25-0-5. But if they play man so much, would it be better to use the RB in pass situations? Also, if we reduce the TE then we might get more WR sets on the field.
 

camsmith

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 25, 2005
Posts
13,026
Likes
379
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Denver Broncos, Storm, Pompey
Re: Cool Sim Site

camsmith...

i made these changes, let me know if you think i should change anything...

pass 65% run 35% (previously 60-40)

pass short-med-long 20-40-40 (previously 20-45-35)
Looks good to me if you're happy. Do we have the offensive coach here?

I reckon we can catch them out on the long passes. Esp with our QB.

Inside-outside as much post above.

Sorry for bringing this on late.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Southerntakeover

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Posts
26,575
Likes
14,255
Location
At vB temple...
AFL Club
Adelaide
Re: Cool Sim Site

camsmith...

i made these changes, let me know if you think i should change anything...

pass 65% run 35% (previously 60-40)

pass short-med-long 20-40-40 (previously 20-45-35)

run inside-outside 50-50 (previously 80-20)
To be honest, i think thats bordering on overkill, and the run outside is too high.
 

GG.exe

Killer on the Road ™
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Posts
96,629
Likes
51,244
Location
In every girl's wet dream
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Ravens-Raiders-Dolphins
Re: Cool Sim Site

it's now....

pass 65% run 35% (previously 60-40)

pass short-med-long 20-40-40 (previously 20-45-35)

run inside-outside 70-30 (previously 80-20)

wr-te-fb-hb now 75-20-0-5 (previously 70-25-0-5)

i strongly believe we should pass a lot deep. Their DBs are shit and the OLBs are good.
 

camsmith

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 25, 2005
Posts
13,026
Likes
379
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Denver Broncos, Storm, Pompey
Re: Cool Sim Site

gg said:
it's now....

pass 65% run 35% (previously 60-40)

pass short-med-long 20-40-40 (previously 20-45-35)

run inside-outside 70-30 (previously 80-20)

wr-te-fb-hb now 75-20-0-5 (previously 70-25-0-5)

i strongly believe we should pass a lot deep. Their DBs are shit and the OLBs are good.
I think that too, Maybe 15-40-45?

Not sure about raising the TE by 5%?

Southerntakeover said:
To be honest, i think thats bordering on overkill, and the run outside is too high.
Yep. Watched more film and think 30% should be alright.
 

camsmith

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 25, 2005
Posts
13,026
Likes
379
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Denver Broncos, Storm, Pompey
Re: Cool Sim Site

i made it 40-60 run-pass just because we actually have a higher run grade than they do a run-defense.

but we really should throw the ball deep WHEN we do throw.
Their last game they had blown coverage many times and if not for a shit QB would have paid for it like they did the week before.

How could is our QB's vision? Because often we have 2 on 1 on WR's with one WR with only a CB to beat.. if the QB see's it it'll bring huge gains.
 

camsmith

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 25, 2005
Posts
13,026
Likes
379
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Denver Broncos, Storm, Pompey
Re: Cool Sim Site

We won 27-0 and I changed the tactics lol AFTER the result.
That could ____ teams up though, why dont they start when their meant to? I'd be pissed if I noticed something huge with 20 mins to go but was too late..

Btw, what tactics did we have it on for the game?
 

GG.exe

Killer on the Road ™
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Posts
96,629
Likes
51,244
Location
In every girl's wet dream
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Ravens-Raiders-Dolphins
Re: Cool Sim Site

it's now....

pass 65% run 35% (previously 60-40)

pass short-med-long 20-40-40 (previously 20-45-35)

run inside-outside 70-30 (previously 80-20)

wr-te-fb-hb now 75-20-0-5 (previously 70-25-0-5)

i strongly believe we should pass a lot deep. Their DBs are shit and the OLBs are good.
i think these ones. Tho i changed the run inside-outside from 50-50 not long ago.
 
Top Bottom