Remove this Banner Ad

Goddard

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If you take into account their age, then i'm not so sure it is such a huge diffference. If Goddard was going to Hawks, Swans, Pies or WCE, I think it is a great move due to their being 100% mix for the flag. No doubt on these teams..a lot of doubt on the Bombers.

I'm not so sure the Bombers will get a flag in the next 1-2 years which means his time will be up. I know he has signed for 4 years but bloody hell....30+ (May) during the 2015 season and all he will be doing is raking in his pay check.

Then why are you keeping Waite and Scotland?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

So Essendon come knocking, BJ looks at their list and the St Kilda one, doesn't see much difference in terms of premiership potential but all that extra moolah makes a world of difference, so off he goes to the Bowls Club/Essendon Airport.
Might have to sell a home game, richmond style, to pay for him !
 
We are most likely going to lose Monfries as it would be stupid to match an offer of 4 years from Port.

So crazy to sign Monfries a born and bred bomber player and two years younger than goddard on a 4 year deal but sign someone else two years older mercenary on a 4 year deal.

what are they drinking down there at Bomberland
 
In terms of salary I rationalize it as mcveigh, monfries and slattery = Goddard and 2 draftees or rookie upgrades.
We may not be able to front load cos of Hurley, Ryder and Stanton's deals, but smart cap structuring should hold us in good stead


Yeah back ended deals etc, they get a sniff of success and commit for a bit less etc
 
So crazy to sign Monfries a born and bred bomber player and two years younger than goddard on a 4 year deal but sign someone else two years older mercenary on a 4 year deal.

what are they drinking down there at Bomberland

Please tell me you are taking the piss???
 
Then why are you keeping Waite and Scotland?

They both have 1 year left lol. You just signed Goddard for 4 at the highest rate on offer.

The reason Saints wont go close to matching the offer is that they know his output and body is shot compared to 2010. Have you watched the guy closely? The Saints have ummed and aarghed publicly but it is all a game. They have managed him out with their low ball offers earlier this season...since then it has been a farce...they'd rather the pick.

The club love pick 13 which will turn into a ten year player.
 
A team is active in the new system trying to improve and people just write it off and attack them.. :rolleyes:

This is Bigfooty,mate. It's almost become unreadable. Surprised that the owner is happy to sit back and watch it turn into a piece of shit.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

They both have 1 year left lol. You just signed Goddard for 4 at the highest rate on offer.

The reason Saints wont go close to matching the offer is that they know his output and body is shot compared to 2010. Have you watched the guy closely? The Saints have ummed and aarghed publicly but it is all a game. They have managed him out with their low ball offers earlier this season...since then it has been a farce...they'd rather the pick.

The club love pick 13 which will turn into a ten year player.

You said

30+ (May) during the 2015 season and all he will be doing is raking in his pay check.

Waite will be 32 in 2015 and Scotland, who you just signed, 34.

So why won't they just be "raking in their pay cheques"?
 
So crazy to sign Monfries a born and bred bomber player and two years younger than goddard on a 4 year deal but sign someone else two years older mercenary on a 4 year deal.

what are they drinking down there at Bomberland

If passion for the club was all a player needed then Henry Slattery would be on a 10 year deal. Reality is that Monfries is a fringe player at Essendon who has shown little to no improvement over the past few seasons and is a one dimensional lead up forward.

You may have an over inflated idea of his ability as he usually plays well against Carlton.
 
If you take into account their age, then i'm not so sure it is such a huge diffference. If Goddard was going to Hawks, Swans, Pies or WCE, I think it is a great move due to their being 100% mix for the flag. No doubt on these teams..a lot of doubt on the Bombers.

I'm not so sure the Bombers will get a flag in the next 1-2 years which means his time will be up. I know he has signed for 4 years but bloody hell....30+ (May) during the 2015 season and all he will be doing is raking in his pay check.

If you keep Monfries then it is a nice piece of FA work. If you lose Monfries directly for salary cap reasons, then Hirdy may have been channelling Vossy!
wow, did someone just say that getting Goddard and losing Monfries is a bad result?

Oh you, Bigfooty
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Which club wouldn't Monfries get a game for? I can think of only one.

Monfries is a good player, one of my favourites. But if he wants more opportunity and port are offering him 1.6mil over 4 years then his time has come, he can go, with the blessing of most bombers on here. We have at least 4 others capable of playing the monfries role (nick obrien will make it his own next year) ideally we get some kind of compo, but thems the breaks
 
So Monfries goes for contract $$ and 4 year deal reasons, and Goddard comes in vice verca but two years older.

Are Bomber fans really saying Monfries is fringe? He has averaged 19-20 games per year for the last 4 years and has reached peak age. Monfries best year might still be ahead of him when we know Goddards very best year is mostl likely behind him.

Goddard is a great get...but losing Monfries due to Goddard lessons the the net gain affect. Plug one leak, open up another.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom