Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 4
SuperCoach Rd 4 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 4 AF Trades - AFF Talk - Capt/VC
I have been a massive Maxwell doubter over the course of the year, so I know it looks crazy for me too vote him. Fact is on this years form Maxwell was clearly better. He had more games in the good / very good range, less games in the hopeless range then Goldsack. My problem with Maxwell is his a very limited player however he is deffinately the kind of work horse who clubs need.
Goldsack can look good in flashes and much like Maxwell doesn't really have a position on the ground that he can really hold down and call his own. His too skinny for KP and more then likely always will be. His not clean enough or one touch enough to play as a strictly rebounding HBF or midfield. Maxwell offers more as a small KPB, Is at least handy as a foward where as Goldsack looked pretty poor when forced foward. Maxwell is more accountable and has all the added intangibles that everyone who rates him highly can tell you about. Goldsack is a pretty similar player to Maxwell, his probably cleaner with the ball and moves a bit better and dares to take players on on the rebound which looks good but as a player Maxwell is a fair way ahead IMO
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He's a tackling animal.. could easily turn into the big bodied Ling type taggerGoldsack wont play midfield.
I'm not sure it is. He falls off the back of his opponent on a lead and he also seems to get beaten in a one on one contested marking situation. I have seen Brown come across and try to spoil Maxwell's opponent when Maxwell didn't make the contest. I'm hopeful he'll maintain his improvement but I am also similarly hopeful of Goldsack.^i think thats an exagerration about maxwell being beaten far too regularly.
I have seen Brown come across and try to spoil Maxwell's opponent when Maxwell didn't make the contest.
Maxwell has covered for Brown a hell of a lot more than the other way round. He would struggle as an inside midfielder as someone as suggeted simply because his not a clean one touch player. You don't have time to be fumbling around for the ball in tight and Goldsack is deffinately a fumbler. I have seen guys cut from Calder for less. He may make it as a midfield tagger and I hope he does it would help us 10 fold but right now there is no way you could argue Goldsack is a better player. I also struggle to see anything that would suggest he is going to be a better player then Maxwell
^i think thats an exagerration about maxwell being beaten far too regularly.
Brown played on the guns. Maxwell is manning up the lesser forwards in most cases. I am not trying to be a Maxwell basher as I love his hardness and positive attitude around the club but I agree with other posters in that he isn't a great stopper in the Presti / Wakelin mode or a great rebounder off the backline like Harry O or Heater. He is excellent as a third man up and can pinch hit in other positions. I like the idea of him as a tagger if he can consistently pull it off.Maxwell has covered for Brown a hell of a lot more than the other way round.
And to be fair, Brown will be a gun, but got killed on the lead repeatedly throughout the season. Certainly more than Maxwell.
Brown played on the guns. Maxwell is manning up the lesser forwards in most cases.
And yet, was our best-performed this year against Franklin and Reiwoldt.
Despite his reputation, the only time he was really de-pantsed this year was in the first Carlton game against Fisher.
Wakelin hardly played on anyone all year either, but for some reason he avoids the same criticism.
Its like beating your head on a brick wall they wont listen.And yet, was our best-performed this year against Franklin and Reiwoldt.
Despite his reputation, the only time he was really de-pantsed this year was in the first Carlton game against Fisher.
Wakelin hardly played on anyone all year either, but for some reason he avoids the same criticism.

