Red mist
Reynholm Industries
- Jun 30, 2014
- 29,143
- 34,097
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, East Side Hawks
The Rat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Rat
Pick 47 is better than I was expecting (which was nothing).
Still not sure why we'd let him go but whatever. It's done now.
He'll be another Jarryd Lyons for the Lions. Great pickup for them
Ha , nice one ... didn't know he was that late .The Rat
NFGThe Rat
Idgaf
He’s no good MistyIdgaf
Misty.. I know you looolHe’s no good Misty
Had attitude problems pre-draft apparently.Ha , nice one ... didn't know he was that late .
It's not that we want it, but if they get Sauce as a FA they'll lose their Tomlinson compoWhy do we want late picks?
Did we receive anything for Sam Jacobs?
Has he even gone to GWS yet as a free agent?
Swapping Sam Jacobs for Billy Frampton would be ok.
Why do we want late picks?
I wouldnt particularly pay mind to what GWS want
Hope he rips it up at Brisbane.
They are contending and he is just the player you need in that scenario.
Would genuinely love to see him win a Premiership.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Again it better not be because our picks 21 & 26 also dropped to 23 & 28. I'd be demanding if i was adelaide that that start of 2nd round gifted to GC had to be used for greenwood in a stand alone trade...and it maybe that something like that happensPick 47 is the pick before our original 3rd round pick, that Carlton now have. Usually they give the pick after.
Is this our compo for ******* us with with pick 3 turning into pick 4 maybe.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Kind of hard to complain about 47 as compensation for a 40-game UFA.
Because we didn't want to give him 3 years, I suppose.
Why do we want late picks?
Dyson Hilder please!Project KPD please.
Don't think there's a required minimum number of players on the rookie lists - clubs (without concessions) must have 38 to 40 players on the senior list and no more than 47 in total including cat A/B rookies. I think we could in theory just have 38 senior players but that would be silly to waste usable list spots.aaaa
Not so much late Picks, If all the Players quoted below leave, we will need 8 new players on the main lists and 2 on the rookie list to replace them
Alternately we Upgrade 2 rookie and then only need 6 main list and 4 rookies.
With Frampton being touted as 1 in, that mean 5-7 main listed players required, most would prefer we got these layers with picks under 50
Based on the following leaving the Club.
Otten, Douglas, Jacobs, Jenkins, Keath, Greenwood, Betts, and Knight, with rookie CEY and Hunter.
also based on the list of 38 main and 6 rookies.
We’ll have one less to pay outward salary.Don't think there's a required minimum number of players on the rookie lists - clubs (without concessions) must have 38 to 40 players on the senior list and no more than 47 in total including cat A/B rookies. I think we could in theory just have 38 senior players but that would be wasting usable list spots.
We’ll have one less to pay outward salary.