- May 3, 2006
- 11,979
- 7,033
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- West Perth, Donnybrook FC, Steelers
Culture
Somethings rotten in sydney etc
Somethings rotten in sydney etc
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Congratulations to the AFL tribunal, they have hit an all time low tonight
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Pathetic. So it's now ok to come up behind a bloke and belt them when they're not looking?
Gutless tribunal.
Behold the AFL tribunal.
![]()
Hang on.
Isn't that Adam Goodes in the back left of the photo?
Plenty of bitter Weagles about. I can't think why they would whinge about Goodes when the AFL has been sweeping all their indiscretions under the carpet for the last few months.
Plenty of bitter Weagles about. I can't think why they would whinge about Goodes when the AFL has been sweeping all their indiscretions under the carpet for the last few months.
Barry Hall and Goodes can do what ever they like on the field. Its a new clause encouraging thuggery in the north eastern state![]()
And he was given a week based on the charge, which then reduced because of the good record and guilty plea.really no surprise.........when was the last time a Swans player was actually suspended?
He deserved a week for that.
And he was given a week based on the charge, which then reduced because of the good record and guilty plea.
How are they saying it's okay? There was no harm to Godfrey - Goodes deserved a week for his ridiculous act and benefited from the reduction due to good record and guilty plea, which everyone gets.Pathetic. So it's now ok to come up behind a bloke and belt them when they're not looking?
Gutless tribunal.
How are they saying it's okay? There was no harm to Godfrey - Goodes deserved a week for his ridiculous act and benefited from the reduction due to good record and guilty plea, which everyone gets.
Hall's act is irrelevant.Not meaning to re-ignite an old argument (well, maybe I am..) but Hall doesn't have a good record and his 40m off theball incident was deemed 'in-play'??? Just like Goodes was deemed 'Low-impact'?? I'm sure Fraser Gehrig would have something to say about both of those.
You are a tool,from memory it is the first time ever he has been reported so he deserves to be given a reprimand.What a joke.
What excuses did they use to get him off?
Because it was definitely intentional,behind play and medium impact.
Christ,the guy wasn't even looking at Goodes when he snipered him.
GUTLESS GOODES.
Hall's act is irrelevant.
The assessment of Gehrig's was the same, but he didn't have the good record option.
Not meaning to re-ignite an old argument (well, maybe I am..) but Hall doesn't have a good record and his 40m off theball incident was deemed 'in-play'??? Just like Goodes was deemed 'Low-impact'?? I'm sure Fraser Gehrig would have something to say about both of those.
Yeah, I thought it was pretty stupid and thought he deserved a week for stupidity, but you should get some benefit for a decade of not being reported.Could've been harmful though and there was intent. Certainly wasn't accidental. Should've gotten the week just for being a git, good record or no.
As I said, he scored the same amount of points as Gehrig.I bet his wasn't deemed 'in-play' though.