- Sep 2, 2005
- 1,219
- 45
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Still a very cowardly act though. What if he'd injured Godfrey? Hardly 'low-impact'...
We aren't that lucky
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Still a very cowardly act though. What if he'd injured Godfrey? Hardly 'low-impact'...
Wow - how can you argue with that sort of razor sharp reparte... I bet you have all the toothless ferals amazed by your vocabulary and your debating skills.do you understand the word W@#KER if not just look in the mirror
Ah, now here's a better use of the word "typically" - well done that man, you've learnt well in the past few posts!The AFL is typically weak as a rule.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ah, now here's a better use of the word "typically" - well done that man, you've learnt well in the past few posts!
Sweet, Byron can goes nuts this week, it seems that they can get off anything
Zing - you got me again. You are amazing!!WTF are you mate are you his boyfriend or something
So what are all of these benefits Sydney players receive at the tribunal?This suprises people why? Hes a Sydney Swans player for one so thats a bonus for him and two he apparently has a good record with the tribunial.![]()
So what are all of these benefits Sydney players receive at the tribunal?
"Apparently"?![]()
Sweet, Byron can goes nuts this week, it seems that they can get off anything
Obviously you have a problem with the written word. Perhaps you should have a grown up read the post for you and then explain it in pictures...
How odd that at no stage has anyone provided a single reason why Goodes should have received more than 125pts.how odd that the only people on here who think it's the right decision are Swans supporters..
![]()
Does this mean that they still struggle with the concept of the game itself?
This suprises people why? Hes a Sydney Swans player for one so thats a bonus for him and two he apparently has a good record with the tribunial.
As for his Brownlow chances lets just say they are as "Goodes" as gone!.
![]()
This suprises people why? Hes a Sydney Swans player for one so thats a bonus for him and two he apparently has a good record with the tribunial.![]()
How odd that at no stage has anyone provided a single reason why Goodes should have received more than 125pts.
"Forward pass ref!"how odd that the only people on here who think it's the right decision are Swans supporters..
![]()
Does this mean that they still struggle with the concept of the game itself?
What's this "you people" - I've probably been following AFL/VFL longer than you!odd? the tribunal is odd, off the ball forearm in back with considerable force..fells player.. you have to be kidding? Players have spent time off for a hell of a lot less. Can you explain how come he only got 125 points?
Do you people still applaud throw ins?
I thought it was quite a simple recommendation given that you failed to understand my post.Awww did I hit a nerve? Me grow up LMAO whatever why don't you go stalk your boyfriend some more do you have any idea what the meaning of Obsessed is?![]()
I better post this pic again so you pay attention to the post hes in just the right angle for you too enjoy!![]()
![]()
He did get a week, but reduced because of his good record."Forward pass ref!"
Can't belive he didn't get a week. And no Swans fans, its not just because i'm an Eagles, I actually do respect the Swans and their players (most of them) but I cannot see the reasoning behind this?
doubt it.What's this "you people" - I've probably been following AFL/VFL longer than you!
So which specific part of the charge do you think is wrong?