Remove this Banner Ad

Goodes let off

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Sweet, Byron can goes nuts this week, it seems that they can get off anything

Byron definitely has a bad record, so I wouldn't advise him to do anything that has him fronting the tribunal any time soon...

Godfrey has played well this season, along with two other players perennially hated by their own supporters Rowan Jones and Ben Mathews. Definitely harsh to hope that he'll be injured, Brock Machine.
 
This suprises people why? Hes a Sydney Swans player for one so thats a bonus for him and two he apparently has a good record with the tribunial.:rolleyes:

As for his Brownlow chances lets just say they are as "Goodes" as gone!.

4zefb85.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

This suprises people why? Hes a Sydney Swans player for one so thats a bonus for him and two he apparently has a good record with the tribunial.:rolleyes:

As for his Brownlow chances lets just say they are as "Goodes" as gone!.

4zefb85.jpg

Aww you one of those people who think his two Brownlows were flukes?
 
This suprises people why? Hes a Sydney Swans player for one so thats a bonus for him and two he apparently has a good record with the tribunial.:rolleyes:

He's never been reported, which helps (incidentally Fixter has never been suspended in the AFL, but he's been reported once).

Jolly got done for 2 weeks for a very iffy kneeing offence when he didn't even make contact with his knee in 2005, and Williams got done for 1 week for a trip that clearly missed in I think 2005 as well, so I doubt being a Swan gives us any favours.

If anything, our low report rate (not just suspension rate, but the fact we get reported very seldomly) lies with the fact our players are inclined to tackle rather than bump 99% of the time, and the fact we are one of the worser sherpherding teams in the comp and never lay hard sherpherds. Also means we're caught holding the ball more, but anyway.
 
How odd that at no stage has anyone provided a single reason why Goodes should have received more than 125pts.

odd? the tribunal is odd, off the ball forearm in back with considerable force..fells player.. you have to be kidding? Players have spent time off for a hell of a lot less. Can you explain how come he only got 125 points?
Do you people still applaud throw ins?
 
:D how odd that the only people on here who think it's the right decision are Swans supporters..:eek:
Does this mean that they still struggle with the concept of the game itself?
"Forward pass ref!"

Can't belive he didn't get a week. And no Swans fans, its not just because i'm an Eagles, I actually do respect the Swans and their players (most of them) but I cannot see the reasoning behind this?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

odd? the tribunal is odd, off the ball forearm in back with considerable force..fells player.. you have to be kidding? Players have spent time off for a hell of a lot less. Can you explain how come he only got 125 points?
Do you people still applaud throw ins?
What's this "you people" - I've probably been following AFL/VFL longer than you!

So which specific part of the charge do you think is wrong? It was low impact - Godfrey went to ground and wasn't hurt.
 
Was the softest report I've ever seen. Goes to show that AFL really is becoming more like netball every day. Not surprised that the supporters of the softest clubs around are whinging the loudest. Should have been thrown out to begin with.
 
Awww did I hit a nerve? Me grow up LMAO whatever why don't you go stalk your boyfriend some more do you have any idea what the meaning of Obsessed is?:rolleyes:

I better post this pic again so you pay attention to the post hes in just the right angle for you too enjoy!:D

4zefb85.jpg
I thought it was quite a simple recommendation given that you failed to understand my post.

I have no idea who you are or what stalking obsession you're talking about.
 
What's this "you people" - I've probably been following AFL/VFL longer than you!

So which specific part of the charge do you think is wrong?
doubt it.


The part that is wrong, is that he didn't at least get 1 match suspension.
You are saying what he did doesn't warrant a suspension, correct?
Explain then how a tummy tap with much less force is deemed worthy of suspension, if you can't see the anomalies then I'm afraid I was right the first time and you struggle with the concept of the game.:eek:
Charles Mansons sentence should have been reduced for prior good record, what a farce this tribunal is..not to mention some of the Swans fans on here..the obvious blind bias is so demeaning.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Goodes let off

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top