- Aug 31, 2008
- AFL Club
- Other Teams
I haven't changed any topic, explain to me where I have?You bag Clarko for being stubborn and not doing what you want, someone said go apply for the job yourself then because all you are doing is saying you can see it more clearly than Clarko.
You've also said that Clarko isn't the best coach going right now that Hardwick is. If you think the Tigers have a better list than the Hawks then you've got to look further than just W/L to decide who is coaching better.
But what do you do? Are we going to win the flag or not.
You don't want to discuss the comments you make, so you change the topic and then wait for the response to you can use that answer to act like it justifies what you post about Clarko.
It's becoming common on here, just give me a yes or a no, no interest in details or reasoning and often it's when you don't like the reasoning you've gotten off someone.
Do I think we will win the flag this year? No I don't. Do I know we won't win the flag this year? No I don't.
Do I thin whether you think we will win the flag means your opinions on Clarko are correct? No I don't.
You say it's not about being black and right but you are making it a binary arguement which leaves no room for the obvious I don't know or you're asking the wrong question or any discussion at all.
I asked him a simple question to begin with and got a long-winded answer that answered everything but the actual question.
He changed the topic every time, he told me to go apply for the job, told me to go and support Collingwood, and continued to avoid a straightforward question - do you think we will win the flag? It's simple.
Internalize all of your excuses, reasons and insights and come up with the answer, then explain it. But there was none of that - there we just a long winded post that didn't address anything. Did you read the post? Maybe you haven't yet.
I'm not saying you can't have a discussion. But I wasn't asking him for discussion points that didn't answer the question that I'd asked.
Where are these followers that I want BTW?
Where is the answer to "do you reckon we are a chance for the flag?" In the below. Feel free to highlight it for me.
Lets look at this.
Clarko is proven, what is currently underneath him after losing Ratts, Fagan, Rath, Russel.......the list goes on and on, are not, plain and simple.
But even forgetting this as a side issue, if you have no forwards who can take a game apart, in particular a big forward, preferably 2 then what can you do until you are "provided" with them?
icthmond would not have one last year if it wasn't for Lynch.
Where do we find them? It's called patients unfortunately.
But supporters need to remember that the HFC has always eventfully found them, before shooting from the hip, whether it's in time for Clarko or not is irrelevant, to the fact that this man is trying his best with what he has.
I am 110% positive that as soon as a big forward on our current list starts to cause major problems for the opposition all this Clarko yammering will go away and he'll be happier then anyone on here. He is not a stupid man or a useless leader of men.
Yes, as the coach the buck stops with him, but lets have some context about it.