- Mar 3, 2022
- 7,299
- 10,435
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
AFL decides homophobia is four times worse than death threats.
Discuss.
Discuss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
On one hand it’s consistent with the Finlayson one. On the other, you could bring up multiple instances of worse actions copping much more lenient penaltiesAFL decides homophobia is four times worse than death threats.
Discuss.
Not much to discuss. Graham made a mistake but he also didnt look the part either while making that mistake im afraidAFL decides homophobia is four times worse than death threats.
Discuss.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I’m sorry I don’t care what’s expected nowadays but 4 weeks is just far too harsh. People need to harden up. Whatever happened to ‘sticks and stones…’.
GWS player probably should have reached out after and said “not on mate you gotta do better - if I dobbed you in you could have got 4 weeks”.
Real man stuff.
“Sticks and stones” was twee Boomer shit that did nothing other than enable bullies and gaslight their victims into mental health issues and suicide attempts.
It institutionalised the dangerous idea that true toughness was suffering in silence, rather than asking for help or calling out people on their toxic bullshit.
Good riddance to that crap.
Gone too far the other way.
Outrage and being offended at every turn.
People have no resilience these days.
Need to find the right balance.
Perhaps you need to become more resilient in a society that is getting better at calling people out on their shit?
It’s all a matter of perspective really.
The AFL is the wokest sporting code in the world.Gone too far the other way.
Outrage and being offended at every turn.
People have no resilience these days.
Need to find the right balance.
That only makes sense if you make up your own definition of resilience
agree. graham would have better of calling his opponent a fat, ugly parasite and mention that he took their mum and sister out and had a 3some. terrible sledge but not sure if a reportable offence.I’m sorry I don’t care what’s expected nowadays but 4 weeks is just far too harsh. People need to harden up. Whatever happened to ‘sticks and stones…’.
FFS you can end someone’s career under the guise of a football act and cop nothing. But call someone a name and you are crucified.
The AFL has gone to shit under this regime.
So what's the right amount of homophobia for you?Gone too far the other way.
Outrage and being offended at every turn.
People have no resilience these days.
Need to find the right balance.
Not really. I just think you're too close to the source to see it. No one seems more consistently and pathologically outraged and offended to me these days than the people who are constantly complaining that everyone else is outraged and offended and that there is supposedly some "woke" boogeyman hiding behind every tree. Then they psychologically implode when a brand of cheese changes its name.
If society is shifting to a point where people are more often getting called out on their bullshit, it seems like those agitating against this shift are the ones showing a lack of resilience.
I think minority groups have, by historical and cultural necessity, shown far more resilience than most of us could ever imagine.
Whereas the person whining "ugh... you can't even say 'insert bigoted slur' anymore" sounds to me like a pathetic sook. Harden up indeed!
So what's the right amount of homophobia for you?
Hey you're the one who said we had "gone too far the other way" and that "people have no resilience".None. Grow up.
Hey you're the one who said we had "gone too far the other way" and that "people have no resilience".
How else do you interpret that than that you think it was better when you could be a little racist, or sexist or homophobic and the people affected should harden the **** up?
First thing I did was ask. You gave a contradictory answer.How else? Ask rather than assume.
It leads to better discussion. As you age you will hopefully better appreciate that.
It really depends on what you said and in what context. I've seen people claim they didn't mean anything discriminatory before, when in fact they were being discriminatory and simply didn't want to acknowledge it. Not saying that's the case with you, just that people aren't always looking at it from an impartial perspective.I have been accused of being racist on this forum today because others decided they were in control of what I meant, not me.
And what view is that exactly?We live in a world where we are expected to not only NOT be discriminatoy, which is of course great, but also to conform to one view and actively practice that view whether you think it or not.
I don't understand this. Are you saying putting pronouns in an email signature is a race to being a victim and profiting from it?Some workers have to announce their pronouns, some have to have a variety of messaging in their email signatures. Two small examples of where this continues to head - people are in a race to be victims. Particularly when they can profit from it.
Who is screaming that they are a victim in this case?Sometimes bad things will happen - we need to be better at being able to work through it and resolve our differences. Not immediately scream to the world we are victims and demand someone be disgraced publically.