Greatest allrounder

Who is the greatest allrounder

  • Jacques Kallis

    Votes: 22 34.4%
  • Garry Sobers

    Votes: 28 43.8%
  • Imran Khan

    Votes: 5 7.8%
  • Kapil Dev

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Richard Hadlee

    Votes: 2 3.1%
  • Ian Botham

    Votes: 3 4.7%
  • Keith Miller

    Votes: 2 3.1%
  • Shane Watson

    Votes: 2 3.1%

  • Total voters
    64

Slax

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jan 13, 2001
Posts
15,847
Likes
6,743
Location
In the dark corner of the bar away from security
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
Other Teams
Man City
Thread starter #1
Following on from some drunken debate on Saturday during the rain it is time to put up (probably again) the debate about who is the best allrounder of all time.

Here are the candidates
Jacques Kallis - 156 tests
Batting - 12,788 runs @ 57.35 Bowling - 280 wickets @ 32.63 Fielding 188 catches

Garry Sobers - 93 Tests
Batting - 8,032 @ 57.78 Bowling - 235 @ 34.03 Fielding 109

Imran Khan - 88 Tests
Batting - 3,807 @ 37.69 Bowling - 362 @ 22.81 Fielding 28

Kapil Dev - 131 tests
Batting - 5,248 @ 31.05 Bowling - 434 @ 29.64 Fielding 64

Richard Hadlee - 86 tests
Batting - 3,124 @ 27.16 Bowling - 431 @ 22.29 Fielding 39

Ian Botham - 102 Tests
Batting - 5,200 @ 33.54 Bowling - 383 @ 28.40 Fielding 120

Keith Miller - 55 Tests
Batting - 2,958 @ 36.97 Bowling - 170 @ 22.97 Fielding 38

Shane Watson - 35 tests
Batting - 2,328 @ 37.54 Bowling - 59 @ 28.91 Fielding 25
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

TassieSaint

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Posts
6,530
Likes
2,541
Location
Hobart
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Tassie Tigers
#4
From my time Kallis definitely.

But from what I've heard Sobers was a much better bowler than would show up in stats and could bowl fast, medium, off spin, leg spin pretty much anything he wanted.

So combined with his batting and fielding I think that would make him the best all rounder in the true sense of the word.
 

ioppolo

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Posts
20,019
Likes
12,202
Location
Perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Chelsea, OKC Thunder, Scorchers
#5
It's a shame I wasn't around during Sobers time, I'd have to say Kallis from what I've seen.
 

Black Diamond

Sleight of Hand
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Posts
7,642
Likes
6,264
Location
Beyond Reproach
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
BMC Racing
#6
Kallis is the best player of my lifetime, period.

I voted Sobers though. I'd have Kallis ahead as a bowler, but Sobers' penchant for massive scores puts him ahead as a batsman. As an aside, my father was there when Sobers hit 250 odd against Australia playing for the World XI.
 

Adelaide Hawk

Hall of Famer
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
Posts
45,326
Likes
33,998
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Norwood
#7
Sobers by the length of the straight. Someone once said of Sobers that he was totally unaware the game was meant to be difficult. That pretty much sums him up.

Nobody who saw Sobers play would even think about voting for anyone else.
 

aflcliche

Club Legend
Joined
May 26, 2010
Posts
1,716
Likes
1,016
AFL Club
Carlton
#8
IMO opinion it is hard to be definitive for several reasons. If we consider batting allrounders, then I would say clearly Sobers. I believe he was more of a frontline bowler than Kallis too. He would make anyones world 11 as a batsman alone, whereas Kallis wouldn't. However, in terms of bowling allrounders, Imran Khan is my choice. But then, consider the period of their careers. Botham was unbelievable at the start and then fell away, whereas Imran was exceptional towards the end of his career. Miller's record stands for itself and by all reports was an amazing player but did not play as many tests as Khan even though their records are near identical. So how can we rate one over the other? Especially since most of us have not seen Miller play.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2005
Posts
25,222
Likes
22,261
Location
Leafy eastern suburbs
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Cartagena C.F., NYJ, A's
Moderator #9
Channel 9 (Nicholas, Barry Richards (IIRC) and Chappelli) discussed this at tea yesterday. Both Richards and Chappelli named Sir Garfield Sobers as their no. 1 all-rounder of all time, very emphatically.

Chappell said that as a boy, his dad used to take him to Adelaide Oval and his dad told Chappell (presumably Greg and Trevor as well) to watch how Miller played.

One player who BF always forgets in these types of discussions is Richie Benaud. Played 63 tests and scored 2201 runs in 97 innings with a top score of 122 (three centuries and nine 50s) at an average of 24.45 runs/innings. He also took 248 wickets at an average of 27.03 runs/wicket. Certainly wouldn't be the greatest all-rounder of all time, but his career should be recognised more than just being the face of Nine's cricket coverage.
 

POBT

Premium Platinum
Joined
Mar 10, 2004
Posts
23,710
Likes
29,906
Location
Brisbane
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
#10
I reckon Imran often gets overlooked. IIRC, in the last 10 years of his career, he averaged around 50 with the bat and 19 with the ball. That is phenomenal. He'd be in my top 3.
 

aflcliche

Club Legend
Joined
May 26, 2010
Posts
1,716
Likes
1,016
AFL Club
Carlton
#11
Channel 9 (Nicholas, Barry Richards (IIRC) and Chappelli) discussed this at tea yesterday. Both Richards and Chappelli named Sir Garfield Sobers as their no. 1 all-rounder of all time, very emphatically.

Chappell said that as a boy, his dad used to take him to Adelaide Oval and his dad told Chappell (presumably Greg and Trevor as well) to watch how Miller played.

One player who BF always forgets in these types of discussions is Richie Benaud. Played 63 tests and scored 2201 runs in 97 innings with a top score of 122 (three centuries and nine 50s) at an average of 24.45 runs/innings. He also took 248 wickets at an average of 27.03 runs/wicket. Certainly wouldn't be the greatest all-rounder of all time, but his career should be recognised more than just being the face of Nine's cricket coverage.
I agree. Apparently was an innovative captain too who introduced a new kind of culture and team spirit.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Outshined

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 12, 2009
Posts
5,657
Likes
7,835
Location
WA
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Liverpool
#15
I'd go Kallis purely because I've grown up watching him and he's head and shoulders above any of the more contemporary all-rounders. Some of the older guys on here might be more inclined to go with Sobers though. His figures speak for themselves.
 

Plugger35

The umpires are always right!
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Posts
91,970
Likes
89,614
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Chelsea, Black Caps, Subiaco
#16
Vettori always tends to get overlooked when talking all rounders but he has just about been NZ's best bowler and batsman the past 10 years or so.

Hard to go past Kallis for modern day all rounders though, his stats are incredible.

Hadlee, Botham, Kapil Dev and Imran Khan were all gun all rounders and great to watch as a kid.

Never saw Sobers play unfortunately but most people that saw him rate him as the best all rounder of all time so he must have been pretty damn good.
 

Gough

Moderator
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Posts
40,698
Likes
66,461
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Moderator #17
I'd go Kallis purely because I've grown up watching him and he's head and shoulders above any of the more contemporary all-rounders. Some of the older guys on here might be more inclined to go with Sobers though. His figures speak for themselves.
Agreed, Sobers or Kallis, might as well ask how old are you?
 

Wallaby

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 8, 2007
Posts
8,290
Likes
8,702
Location
vic
AFL Club
Richmond
#20
Channel 9 (Nicholas, Barry Richards (IIRC) and Chappelli) discussed this at tea yesterday. Both Richards and Chappelli named Sir Garfield Sobers as their no. 1 all-rounder of all time, very emphatically.

Chappell said that as a boy, his dad used to take him to Adelaide Oval and his dad told Chappell (presumably Greg and Trevor as well) to watch how Miller played.

One player who BF always forgets in these types of discussions is Richie Benaud. Played 63 tests and scored 2201 runs in 97 innings with a top score of 122 (three centuries and nine 50s) at an average of 24.45 runs/innings. He also took 248 wickets at an average of 27.03 runs/wicket. Certainly wouldn't be the greatest all-rounder of all time, but his career should be recognised more than just being the face of Nine's cricket coverage.
Just for fun, you know that Paul Reiffel has a higher batting average AND lower Bowling average than Benaud? Just saying stats can be fun - Reiffel was seriously under-rated as a player, but not quite in Benaud's league (only playerd 35 tests).

I'd go Sobers - purely because I believe he is in the Top 5 batsmen ever (I rank him No 2). While some of the others are close, I don't think any of them rate in the Top 10 bowlers of all time (nor Kallis as a bat).

And where's the Freddie Flintoff option:p?
 

djrossie

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Posts
16,893
Likes
8,731
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
#22
I reckon Imran often gets overlooked. IIRC, in the last 10 years of his career, he averaged around 50 with the bat and 19 with the ball. That is phenomenal. He'd be in my top 3.
I wasn't aware of that :eek:

Imran Khan really had a lot of things going for him. A rock star of the game.
 

Black Diamond

Sleight of Hand
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Posts
7,642
Likes
6,264
Location
Beyond Reproach
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
BMC Racing
#23
IMO opinion it is hard to be definitive for several reasons. If we consider batting allrounders, then I would say clearly Sobers. I believe he was more of a frontline bowler than Kallis too.
Average, Strike rate, economy

Sobers: 34.03, 91.9, 2.22
Kallis: 32.63, 69, 2.83

Kallis is a better bowler.

One player who BF always forgets in these types of discussions is...
Monty Noble.
During his long career, Monty Noble showed exceptional ability in every detail of the game, and by many people was regarded as the greatest all-round cricketer produced by Australia.
 

sherb

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Posts
26,854
Likes
19,845
Location
Western Sydney
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Swans
#25
One player who BF always forgets in these types of discussions is Richie Benaud. Played 63 tests and scored 2201 runs in 97 innings with a top score of 122 (three centuries and nine 50s) at an average of 24.45 runs/innings. He also took 248 wickets at an average of 27.03 runs/wicket. Certainly wouldn't be the greatest all-rounder of all time, but his career should be recognised more than just being the face of Nine's cricket coverage.
Benaud's first-class record would suggest that he was a better batsman than his Test record indicated.
http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Players/0/919/919.html
 
Top Bottom