- Aug 21, 2011
- 8,236
- 21,323
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Manchester City, Melbourne Victory
http://richard-di-natale.greensmps....s/greens-secure-senate-inquiry-sports-science
Good initiative from the Greens to secure this.
The Senate has the power to take evidence under oath; can also require that people attend, and that documents be produced.
From what I've heard, Dank is a required person at this inquiry and it will be a good chance to get him under oath and on the record of what occurred.
But what interests me is this:
Should any of the Essendon administrators or members of the football department be dragged in front of this committee?
If the Bombers have nothing to hide, then this would be the best place to clear the air.
Good initiative from the Greens to secure this.
The Senate has the power to take evidence under oath; can also require that people attend, and that documents be produced.
From what I've heard, Dank is a required person at this inquiry and it will be a good chance to get him under oath and on the record of what occurred.
But what interests me is this:
“The inquiry will welcome submissions from sports scientists, players, athletes, club doctors and administrators.”
The terms of reference are:
a. The current scope of practice, (this includes definition, function and operation) and accreditation and regulation arrangements, for the profession;
b. the role of Boards and Management in the oversight of sports scientists inside sporting organisations;
c. the duty of care of sports scientists to athletes.
d. avenues for reform or enhanced regulation of the profession
e. any other related matter
Should any of the Essendon administrators or members of the football department be dragged in front of this committee?
If the Bombers have nothing to hide, then this would be the best place to clear the air.