Ground sizes - the real facts | BigFooty

Ground sizes - the real facts

Discussion in 'AFL - The Australian Football League' started by Wayne Swan, Jun 13, 2018.

  1. Wayne Swan

    Wayne Swan Premium Gold

    Sydney
    Joined:
    Sep 13
    Posts:
    1,456
    So much crap pours out of commentators mouths not the least is "the smaller SCG". Well I found the real ground sizes on the AFL website.

    Lays to rest so many myths, SCG is almost identical to the Gabba and Metricon. MCG is only 3 metres longer than SCG from the centre to the goal line, that's about 2 paces at speed. Now that Subiaco has gone, the most obvious oddly sized ground is Kardinia Park, very much like Subiaco, a cigar shape.

    But commentators will continue with their misinformed drivel, don't let facts get in the way of a story that's good for media.



    [​IMG]
     
    YOTC likes this.

    (Log in to remove this ad.)

  2. LicoriceAllsorts

    LicoriceAllsorts Hall of Famer

    Brisbane Lions
    Joined:
    Feb 13
    Posts:
    40,286
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Other Teams:
    Denver Broncos, Denver Nuggets
    SCG arc is not even 50m I'm pretty sure
     
  3. TiggerMan22

    TiggerMan22 Brownlow Medallist

    Richmond
    Joined:
    Oct 12
    Posts:
    11,554
    Adelaide Oval apparently has very shallow pockets which makes those snaps easier.
     
    Rotayjay and avishka5 like this.
  4. Nomad12

    Nomad12 Team Captain

    Western Bulldogs
    Joined:
    Nov 13
    Posts:
    455
    Other Teams:
    OKC
    ?? Quick search and MCG is 171 long and SCG 155. I knew it couldn't only be a few metres each way.

    Gabba 170 and Metricon 161.
     
    Richo83, A Swallow, Jiggyman and 12 others like this.
  5. juss

    juss Brownlow Medallist

    Richmond
    Joined:
    Feb 09
    Posts:
    14,292
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Other Teams:
    New York Jets
    Width and length doesn't give you the full story, although it is important.
    Once you work out the total surface area of each ground, that's what actually matters I think, the relative space each player has, that is crucial to things like defensive zones and stoppages. It's a lot harder to guard space when there's more of it to guard. Likewise in some grounds you can force a lot of stoppages because players are forced closer together.
     
    Richo83, Jonts, KissKiss and 2 others like this.
  6. blue harvest

    blue harvest Norm Smith Medallist

    Hawthorn
    Joined:
    Sep 08
    Posts:
    9,125
    Location:
    Melbourne
    MCG 171m is fence to fence, it's 160m goal to goal.
     
    Bonz, KissKiss, J_Moore and 3 others like this.
  7. Wayne Swan

    Wayne Swan Premium Gold

    Sydney
    Joined:
    Sep 13
    Posts:
    1,456
    Oops, the AFL site doesn't know the ground dimensions, silly me for believing them!
     
  8. blue harvest

    blue harvest Norm Smith Medallist

    Hawthorn
    Joined:
    Sep 08
    Posts:
    9,125
    Location:
    Melbourne
    SCG has been lengthened a couple of times.
    A few metres when they did the new Trumper Stand near the old hill - you will notice there are a few rows missing from the front of the Churchill Stand. Then another few metres when they did the latest redev down the other end.
    So it's only about 5m shorter than the G and also about 5m narrower. However mucking around with the length during the redevs has resulted in a non symmetrical ground, a couple of the pockets/flanks are shallower than the others.

    It looks smaller on TV because the camera is down much lower.
     
  9. Nomad12

    Nomad12 Team Captain

    Western Bulldogs
    Joined:
    Nov 13
    Posts:
    455
    Other Teams:
    OKC
    Haha fair call missed that you said it was off the afl site.
     
  10. blue harvest

    blue harvest Norm Smith Medallist

    Hawthorn
    Joined:
    Sep 08
    Posts:
    9,125
    Location:
    Melbourne
    It's 50m, someone went out and publicly measured it a few years back after people kept claiming it wasn't.

    I believe when the AFL changed all centre squares from 45m to 50m (2004?) they decided to reduce the 50m arc to 45m at the SCG otherwise it would have intersected the centre square. I'm not sure if they went ahead with it though because I seem to remember teams complaining and then I remember seeing games where the 50m arc went into the centre square but they just chopped off the bit inside the square so it didn't look so stupid. This problem disappeared when they lengthened the ground during the first redev a few years later.

    Anyway the ground is only about 5m short of the G now, 160m to 155m.
     
    J_Moore likes this.
  11. ferrisb

    ferrisb Brownlow Medallist

    Carlton
    Joined:
    May 11
    Posts:
    11,941
    Location:
    The Naughty Corner
    That's what he said....
     
    Richo83, DamoESP, Rotayjay and 2 others like this.

    (Log in to remove this ad.)

  12. CD Xbow

    CD Xbow Club Legend

    Hawthorn
    Joined:
    Oct 14
    Posts:
    1,153
    Hardness matters, too.
     
    Richo83, KissKiss and Packedlunch like this.
  13. PerthBoy86

    PerthBoy86 Premiership Player

    West Coast
    Joined:
    May 16
    Posts:
    3,568
    The G is a pretty round short ground so no big surprise.
     
  14. mightymouse75

    mightymouse75 Norm Smith Medallist

    Fremantle
    Joined:
    Apr 11
    Posts:
    5,283
    Other Teams:
    Wimbledon AFC
    That's what she said
     
  15. avishka5

    avishka5 150 game legend.

    West Coast
    Joined:
    Sep 14
    Posts:
    19,099
    Location:
    Perth SOR
    Its not the size of the ground but how you use it.
     
  16. threesixpio

    threesixpio Brownlow Medallist

    Hawthorn
    Joined:
    Jun 13
    Posts:
    22,039
    I just have small pockets

    (Not sure what this double entendre means but it amuses me greatly)
     
    Hoops, The Goon, Rotayjay and 3 others like this.
  17. Harris 10

    Harris 10 Norm Smith Medallist

    North Melbourne
    Joined:
    Jun 04
    Posts:
    8,575
    Location:
    hgfhkagk
    So the goal line is 5.5m from the fence line at each end, don’t think that’s right.
     
    A Swallow and sobrave like this.
  18. sobrave

    sobrave Norm Smith Medallist

    Port Adelaide
    Joined:
    Aug 15
    Posts:
    6,590
    Location:
    42° south
    At the scg the fences are only 50cm from the boundary line which is incredibly dangerous

    Also the 50m line is definitely 50m, its just that the ball travels further in Sydney which means players that normally cant kick over a jam jar can give it a roost from 53 :rolleyes:
     
    KeilorUnder9s likes this.
  19. Tony Harrison

    Tony Harrison Norm Smith Medallist

    Richmond
    Joined:
    Apr 13
    Posts:
    8,570
    Means you're a tight arse ;)
     
    O'Rourke Awakens!! likes this.
  20. Tandy

    Tandy Club Legend

    Geelong
    Joined:
    Oct 17
    Posts:
    2,598
    Location:
    Victoria
    AFL so dodgy they fudge the facts
     
  21. 99cents

    99cents Club Legend

    GWS
    Joined:
    Dec 11
    Posts:
    2,527
    Other Teams:
    GWS Giants

    The SCG was lengthened in 2007, and then again prior to the Ashes in 2013. 50m is certainly 50m
     
  22. Dazzler10

    Dazzler10 Club Legend

    West Coast
    Joined:
    Apr 15
    Posts:
    2,066
    Location:
    Te Fiti
    SCG 155m long and 136m wide.

    MCG 160 x 141m

    So the MCG is 5m x 5m larger. That's 25 square metres more space. There's nothing crap about commentators saying the SCG is smaller. It clearly is.
     
    Richo83 and Sttew like this.
  23. Wayne Dwop

    Wayne Dwop Team Captain

    Western Bulldogs
    Joined:
    Apr 16
    Posts:
    597
    That doesn't leave much room for boundary umpires and interchange players, trainers and water boys/girls..
     
  24. Tayl0r

    Tayl0r Moderator

    Fremantle
    Joined:
    Jul 09
    Posts:
    32,736
    Location:
    Perth
    The area of an elliptical isn't actually that simple, of the numbers you quoted the SCG is actually 93.4% of the size of the MCG.

    16.556km2 compared to 17.718km2
     
    Ocha905, A Swallow, telsor and 4 others like this.
  25. Fire

    Fire Norm Smith Medallist

    North Melbourne
    Joined:
    Mar 03
    Posts:
    9,926
    17 square kilometers would be closer to a nuclear blast zone than it is to a footy oval.
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2018
Back To Top

Share This Page