That no one noticed until 4 days ago (Monday the 21st), 10 days after squads officially had to be in (Friday the 11th) in a game started Monday the 14th with a side submitted by Burger (not a captain or leadership at the club) via a clause in the rules that states that in the event that pete and I (actual captains) do not name a team, any player can name a team and it will be used, which the simmer (Logger) also did not pick up on and subsequently used, whilst I was verbally jousting with the thread creator (PVF) for his timeframes, and the two of them (PVF & Logger) exclaiming how they had no idea about who was running the preseason to be definitive on anything.
Yup, totally our bad for playing that game.
FTR, I didn't name a team and chose to argue because my intention was to forfeit, unfortunately the rules don't let that happen.
Yup, penalise myself and pete because the individuals involved took 2 weeks to notice, still had to have a think about it, and the responsibility for that match happening is solely ours.
beez thumbed his nose and tried to prove a point, we simply refused to sign inactives who had not committed like every other club has done to meet a quota by a set date. Vastly different intent.
It's such an easy thing to sign inactives who had previously played for you, -1 or -2 I could care less if we remove them from our list and bring in people that actually want to be here.