Gutnik Vs Jackson

[BIG POPPA PUMP]

I log onto www.afl.com.au , click on the Melbourne link and the first I expected to see was Woey's 100th game on the trot...but suprisingly

the AFL reckons there is a bigger story than that....the heading is....
JOE'S RACISM PROBLEM
http://www.afl.com.au/news/story_224353.htm

Could Wayne Jackson make it any more obvious?

He may as well have an anti-Gutnik symbol on the opening page or something. This Jackson bloke is a complete goose. Sort it out personally with Gutnik or even in court but don't rubbish him on your own website

Wayne Jackson can piss off!

 

[Ms.Storm]

That Journalist should have a look at himself too.
How many more stories are we going to get on this issue. Its becoming quite boring.
Joes 100% right about Boys Club mentality at Melbourne among the Board!!!

 

[Darky]

Andrew Bolt writes editorial-style comments for the Herald Sun. It is his job to give an opinion.

I agree with what he says about Gutnick thinking the AFL has some sort of race/creed-based agenda aginst him.

Playing the race card where it's completely false is potentially a hugely damaging slur for someone branded a racist, and the stigma sticks whether the accused racist is proven so or not. It is a very difficult thing to defend, and when it's one person's word against another's, the accused usually comes off looking worst.

To imply that Walker is an anti-semite is a cheap shot by Gutnick, especially when he has no evidence to back it up.

 

[elt]

BPP,

To claim that story and the placing on the website is Jackson's doing is laughable. The AFL website is run primarily by News Ltd with some assistance from Ch7. Hence the reason why virtually all the content is from News Ltd publications. The AFL bosses like Jackson have virtually no input into content.

As for the article itself I think Andrew Bolt makes a fair point.

------------------
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.