Lol you get owned so you repeat the same line.That’s cute as well.
’Cute’ performance by your mob tonightThat’s cute as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol you get owned so you repeat the same line.That’s cute as well.
’Cute’ performance by your mob tonightThat’s cute as well.
At least we are still in the season you salty little bitchLol you get owned so you repeat the same line.
’Cute’ performance by your mob tonight
Lol for another week maybeAt least we are still in the season you salty little bitch
Why did my mind wander to places it shouldn't in terms of bad comedy here ???Blew another calf.
Their opponent wasn't. At that stage they roll the Dogs they likely get Essendon first week.
Ha ha ha.Why did my mind wander to places it shouldn't in terms of bad comedy here ???
On SM-N960F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yes it's much easier to believe GWS put the cue in the rack at half time to avoid playing Essendon week 1 then it is to believe your original premise was bullshit.Exactly, a team that had beaten them during the season, and had got a few of their injured players back in the side since they'd beaten GWS. Switching off at half time meant that they made sure a team that they had been thumped by twice didn't play finals, and they also avoided playing another team in week one that had also beaten them recently. Sure, they had form for not scoring in the second half, but they were actually winning at that point unlike when they were scoreless in the second half against Hawthorn where they had struggled to score all day. GWS had got to 57 at half time against dogs, on track for 110+, and then just stopped. Given what happened today it is easy to believe they made some strategic decisions that day. Either way, it has worked out well for them.
Yes it's much easier to believe GWS put the cue in the rack at half time to avoid playing Essendon week 1 then it is to believe your original premise was bulls**t.
If the dogs were actually any good they would of beaten gold Coast and finished higher then 7th.
Glad I don't have to listen to the media keep talking up these pretenders.
The inequity of the draw had exposed this final series. There are teams in the finals that just don't deserve to be there.
On POT-LX1 using BigFooty.com mobile app
I wouldn't say that is true.My original premise was that Hawthorn would probably have put up better fights against either Eagles or GWS than Essendon and Dogs managed. You can call that bulls**t if you like. Looks like a reasonable premise to me given how bad Dogs and Essendon were, and how good Hawthorn were in their recent games against those teams. Not saying we'd have definitely won, but that wasn't my premise. Expecting a closer contest is a completely reasonable premise.
I wouldn't say that is true.
Dogs were 1 of the main form teams. Whose to say Hawthorn wouldn't have lost their momentom with the bye as well..
You're forgetting the most important part of his argument.I wouldn't say that is true.
Dogs were 1 of the main form teams. Whose to say Hawthorn wouldn't have lost their momentom with the bye as well..
Dumped his mates and club? What is it 1965 and Barassi's just left Melbourne to go to Carlton? I mean how many players in the AFL have moved clubs for more opportunity, money, whatever? Probably it would be pushing 100.Lots of love for a bloke that dumped his mates and club, to try and score a cheap flag with a group of android draft picks he had no connection to.
I really don’t get why he should be pitied?
I wouldn't say that is true.
Dogs were 1 of the main form teams. Whose to say Hawthorn wouldn't have lost their momentom with the bye as well..
The 2nd game against the Giants was in the snow with a lot of talent on the injury list.Dogs is a bit more contentious, but Essendon's record against GWS and Eagles for the year was a 72 point loss, 35 point loss, 55 points loss and 6 point win.
Dogs record against those teams was a 61 point loss, 58 point loss and 61 point win, and the win was a dead rubber for GWS that GWS had very little incentive to win.
Hawthorn's record against Eagles and GWS for the year was a 33 point win, 56 point win, 38 point win and 6 point loss.
Sure, we could have lost momentum, but 9th placed Hawthorn were considerably better against the 5th and 6th sides than 7th and 8th were over the entire year, so it seems reasonable to have an opinion that 9th may have put up more of a competitive effort against 5th or 6th than what we saw happen on the weekend.
The 2nd game against the Giants was in the snow with a lot of talent on the injury list.
Hardly a good indicator.
We normally earn them, not rely on bullshit tricks to make it happen.So you haven't watched any West Coast games in the last 15 years?
Err...because of their recent premiership?There was a comment in an article made that there was lots of pressure on Woosha and the Dons about performance, expectations, and where they finished, again not winning a final.
The article asked, “Why aren’t the bulldogs and bevo under the same scrutiny?”
It’s a great point given their recent premiership.
Against the Bulldogs? No, he's ****ed. He'll be down at Centrelink come Monday.That umpire wont get another final. Giving a free to gws in the F50.