Halfer Deledio

[winty]

Your output has decreased. Didn't he cost you guys two games last year. My Fav was against Freo, when he missed a sitter in front of goal and cost you the game.
Dud at the highest order.

He cost us the game against Freo last year??

Round 12
Fremantle 6.16.52
Geelong 18.10.118

Yup really cost us the game. Sure you're not a Richmond supporter in disguise?

 

[HotDog]

He cost us the game against Freo last year??

Round 12
Fremantle 6.16.52
Geelong 18.10.118

Yup really cost us the game. Sure you're not a Richmond supporter in disguise?

Must of been the year before at unskilled staduim. Hard to remember all of geelongs seasons are very forgettable.


What about this one: Cats15.8 98Eagles16.5 101

Nice game. you like?

 

[winty]

Must of been the year before at unskilled staduim. Hard to remember all of geelongs seasons are very forgettable.


What about this one: Cats15.8 98Eagles16.5 101

Nice game. you like?

Liked the first half....second half sucked.

Geelong 16.13.109 West Coast 5.3.33....liked that one better

 

[W. Smithers]

Tell me how your list has improved??????? Imo it hasnt

Your list has improved over time, Cooney, Griffen and Ray have been handy, but your major improvement has come from players drafted back in the Wallace and Rohde era. We don't have many of those 24-25 year old players thanks to Frawley.

It's going to take time, but we only hit rock bottom once and have only ever got one lot of priority picks. The dogs and the hawks have had the benefit of several priority picks.

 

[W. Smithers]

How's Tambling going?

Still better than Franklin?

Better than Tom Williams. Who wastes a top ten pick on an unproven project player?

 

[9th Placed Finish]

Hmm, if he is a nothing and a dud on the field, can you be kind enough to explain the following quote which is found in the AFL Prospectus 2006, which was compiled by Champion Data and based on statistics in the 2005 season?



If Ottens is, as you say, a nothing and a dud, wouldn't you think that our output would increase when he is on the sidelines?

Two more examples of Richmond supporters acting stupid in public.

Yet with Ottens available for the whole 2006 season(played 22 games) the Cats lost more than 2005, and there scoring averaged dropped from the 101 they had in 2005 with him in the team to 90 in 2006. Certainly decreased in 06 with him there for the whole season? In fact it was only marginally better than the 87 they averaged with him missing games last year.

 

[winty]

Yet with Ottens available for the whole 2006 season(played 22 games) the Cats lost more than 2005, and there scoring averaged dropped from the 101 they had in 2005 with him in the team to 90 in 2006. Certainly decreased in 06 with him there for the whole season? In fact it was only marginally better than the 87 they averaged with him missing games last year.

So it's all Ottens' fault that our average score for dropped last year and doesnt have ANYTHING to do with Kingsley's output falling from 57 goals in 2005 to a pathetic 10 in 2006?

So let's see, that's a 47 goal drop in output which equates to a bit over 2 goals or 12 points a game...and wait....our average score dropped 11 points a game last year! Wow, what a co-incidence!!

 

[9th Placed Finish]

So it's all Ottens' fault that our average score for dropped last year and doesnt have ANYTHING to do with Kingsley's output falling from 57 goals in 2005 to a pathetic 10 in 2006?

So let's see, that's a 47 goal drop in output which equates to a bit over 2 goals or 12 points a game...and wait....our average score dropped 11 points a game last year! Wow, what a co-incidence!!

But you didn't blame Kingsley for the drop in 2005, you blamed Ottens not being there, who mentioned Kingsley not a Tigers supporter, in fact it was you just trying to make Ottens sound better than he is. Or to put it another way those who are calling Kingsley a hack are all wrong because he is single handedly responsible for the Cats woeful 2006 and the very good 2005 by your theory

 

[winty]

But you didn't blame Kingsley for the drop in 2005, you blamed Ottens not being there, who mentioned Kingsley not a Tigers supporter, in fact it was you just trying to make Ottens sound better than he is. Or to put it another way those who are calling Kingsley a hack are all wrong because he is single handedly responsible for the Cats woeful 2006 and the very good 2005 by your theory

I didn't blame Kingsley for the drop in 2005, because it wasn't his fault. What part of that quote didnt you understand? The fact was that we missed Ottens' output when he was injured. Nor did that mean that Kingsley was single handedly responsible for our 2005 season, because if he was the output wouldn't have dropped as much as it did when Ottens was out of the side if your theories about Ottens' contributions to our side were accurate.

The fact is Kingsley had a good season in 2005, as did Ottens when he was there. Ottens continued on with that in 2006, but unfortunately for us Kingsley did not. That's where the drop off came from.

 

[dipper86]

you tell me einstein, how'd franklin go in the rising star...sh%# I forgot, didnt poll a vote...if the experts are any judge then that puts them about level pegging at this point..wouldn't you think...

You absolute fool, once again check your facts before you post, he did poll and he did receive a nomination which is more than i can say about Tambling who has done sweet f*** all.

In ever facet of the game Franklin has been far superior, Tambling is a poor excuse for an AFL footabller.

 

[lids2004roar]

In ever facet of the game Franklin has been far superior, Tambling is a poor excuse for an AFL footabller.

What kind of a comment is this, really?

Once again we see a Hawthorn supporter get extremely insecure about Buddy and resorting to new levels of bias.

 

[9th Placed Finish]

I didn't blame Kingsley for the drop in 2005, because it wasn't his fault. What part of that quote didnt you understand? The fact was that we missed Ottens' output when he was injured. Nor did that mean that Kingsley was single handedly responsible for our 2005 season, because if he was the output wouldn't have dropped as much as it did when Ottens was out of the side if your theories about Ottens' contributions to our side were accurate.

The fact is Kingsley had a good season in 2005, as did Ottens when he was there. Ottens continued on with that in 2006, but unfortunately for us Kingsley did not. That's where the drop off came from.

Correct you blamed Ottens not being there for the drop off. So, by that logic, Kingsley having a poor 06 has nothing to do with it then, you were comparing how much difference there was between the Cats performance with Ottens and without. Not with Kent or without. When shown that you had Ottens for the whole of 2006 season and your side drops more games and average score you look for another scape goat. Hence the Kingsley excuse, so if Kent was to blame for the poor 06 season,he must therefore be congratulated for the stellar 05 season that got the Cats to the finals. Otherswise your post is nothing more than complete crap.

 

[dipper86]

What kind of a comment is this, really?

Once again we see a Hawthorn supporter get extremely insecure about Buddy and resorting to new levels of bias.

Exactly what it looks like, the truth.


You call this being insecure i call this fact,

Franklin has been and is the better player, nothing you can say will prove otherwise.

 

[Bojangles17]

What kind of a comment is this, really?

Once again we see a Hawthorn supporter get extremely insecure about Buddy and resorting to new levels of bias.

wouldn't worry too much what comes from diper, proven himself to be one of the greater boofheads on the boards with simpleminded logic to support an already frail argument...err bigg diper...tell us all bout the bwoody champions down at glenferrie, or should i say Noble park, sorry that meant Launceston.....stand by , this will be good..

 

[dipper86]

wouldn't worry too much what comes from diper, proven himself to be one of the greater boofheads on the boards with simpleminded logic to support an already frail argument...err bigg diper...tell us all bout the bwoody champions down at glenferrie, or should i say Noble park, sorry that meant Launceston.....stand by , this will be good..

Thats funny, once again you were proven wrong and you can't handle it, your football knowledge is non existent.

But the one positive i get out of this is watching you embarrass yourself

you tell me einstein, how'd franklin go in the rising star...sh%# I forgot, didnt poll a vote...if the experts are any judge then that puts them about level pegging at this point..wouldn't you think...

Bahhhhh wrong answer

 

[tin can sam]

Correct you blamed Ottens not being there for the drop off. So, by that logic, Kingsley having a poor 06 has nothing to do with it then, you were comparing how much difference there was between the Cats performance with Ottens and without. Not with Kent or without. When shown that you had Ottens for the whole of 2006 season and your side drops more games and average score you look for another scape goat. Hence the Kingsley excuse, so if Kent was to blame for the poor 06 season,he must therefore be congratulated for the stellar 05 season that got the Cats to the finals. Otherswise your post is nothing more than complete crap.

unless your an idiot you'd know it was mostly to do with our midfield struggles, and a lack of fitness, get over Ottens, he was decent in 2006, but you wouldn't have watched enough games to know that.

 

[dales.girl38]

Better than Tom Williams. Who wastes a top ten pick on an unproven project player?

High risk, high reward- that's what we're hoping for anyway. He hasn't even had time in the game to prove himself, through an injury exactly as James Hird had- not his fault, not our fault, people do recover from injuries and hopefully we'll have a good 8+ years of him when he's fully fit. Don't say he's useless until he's had a good chance to prove himself.

 

[Traffic Light]

Once again we see a Hawthorn supporter get extremely insecure about Buddy and resorting to new levels of bias.

There's no need for them to be insecure.

It's simply because Richmond were silly enough to pass on Franklin in favour of Tambling, and Richmond supporters aren't willing to accept their blunder.

I might be wrong here, but is Tambling the highest pick Aboriginal ever? You'd think for such an honour he would have shown something.

But you also took Deledio over Griffen, so your track record isn't exacltly gleaming.

At least you can rest assured your fans are the loudest

 

[Grin]

unless your an idiot you'd know it was mostly to do with our midfield struggles, and a lack of fitness, get over Ottens, he was decent in 2006, but you wouldn't have watched enough games to know that.

I must be an idiot. I could have swarn it was the coaching.

 

[sante]

There's no need for them to be insecure.

It's simply because Richmond were silly enough to pass on Franklin in favour of Tambling, and Richmond supporters aren't willing to accept their blunder.

I might be wrong here, but is Tambling the highest pick Aboriginal ever? You'd think for such an honour he would have shown something.

But you also took Deledio over Griffen, so your track record isn't exacltly gleaming.

At least you can rest assured your fans are the loudest

So EVERY single player picked up early in a Draft should dominate like Judd in their first 2 years? Imagine the Hall of Fame then

 

[catman2006]

I must be an idiot. I could have swarn it was the coaching.

Since you said it yeah most people in BF do find you to be an idiot and lacking football education.

 

[Traffic Light]

So EVERY single player picked up early in a Draft should dominate like Judd in their first 2 years? Imagine the Hall of Fame then

Who mentioned Judd?

You'd think he would have shown an ounce of his reported talent in 2 years considering he's the most highly touted Aboriginal of all time.

Alwyn Davey looks twice the player Tambling is and he hasn't even played AFL football.

 

[Grin]

Since you said it yeah most people in BF do find you to be an idiot and lacking football education.

Says he, whilst making someone who finished highschool a sandwich.
I'll have a salad one please.
Then you'd better go to bed. It must be 3 days since you've had any sleep.

 

[catman2006]

Says he, whilst making someone who finished highschool a sandwich.
I'll have a salad one please.
Then you'd better go to bed. It must be 3 days since you've had any sleep.

Hahaha I will be in Hayman island all next week but will still have the internet and your right, i do have to go to a party tonight.

Give me your email address and i'll send you some vouchers so your family can eat.

 

[Grin]

Hahaha I will be in Hayman island all next week but will still have the internet and your right, i do have to go to a party tonight.

Give me your email address and i'll send you some vouchers so your family can eat.

Actually I don't mind your sandwiches. Wing a couple of vouchers my way. Cheers busboy.