Both Melbourne and Carlton would be hoping their batch of long term deals signed this year result in at least one more flag for each group. It’s a risk but it’s what you have to do these days it seems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As Cal Twomey just said on trade radio. Unless ur in a crisis like Treloar and Grundy with the Pies, these long term deals give the clubs back the power. If someone comes knocking for them under contract we can demand ridiculous overs, if we want to get rid of them at any stage we just take unders to offload their contracts. Either way theres no way any of them walk out the door as free agents for free and given we've heard Mckay, Curnow, Cripps etc all took significant unders to stay together and improve the list I'm wrapped about it.Both Melbourne and Carlton would be hoping their batch of long term deals signed this year result in at least one more flag for each group. It’s a risk but it’s what you have to do these days it seems.
Stick around for another 7 years and then try again with your nonsenseIf we don’t get him this year it will be next
The big 5 all locked in!! Say what you will about Carlton, our guns don't leave....
gibbs, betts, waite. lost a few of the irish lads we pinned our hopes on.
a few of our mid-tier become guns elsewhere. jacobs, tuohy, maybe even robinson. some of these are pushed of course.
In the 2015 - 2016 trade periods. 6-7 years ago. We've had 3 different coaches and a whole new list since then. The only players still around from then are Ed Curnow, Cripps and Walsh.gibbs, betts, waite. lost a few of the irish lads we pinned our hopes on.
a few of our mid-tier become guns elsewhere. jacobs, tuohy, maybe even robinson. some of these are pushed of course.
As Cal Twomey just said on trade radio. Unless ur in a crisis like Treloar and Grundy with the Pies, these long term deals give the clubs back the power. If someone comes knocking for them under contract we can demand ridiculous overs, if we want to get rid of them at any stage we just take unders to offload their contracts. Either way theres no way any of them walk out the door as free agents for free and given we've heard Mckay, Curnow, Cripps etc all took significant unders to stay together and improve the list I'm wrapped about it.
Yes because clubs never have long term injury clauses in any contracts...Or if they get injured 5 years in you have 2 more years stuck with their salary and no other club will touch them.
You then have to convince the player to retire and give up on a huge amount of money.
As Cal Twomey just said on trade radio. Unless ur in a crisis like Treloar and Grundy with the Pies, these long term deals give the clubs back the power. If someone comes knocking for them under contract we can demand ridiculous overs, if we want to get rid of them at any stage we just take unders to offload their contracts. Either way theres no way any of them walk out the door as free agents for free and given we've heard Mckay, Curnow, Cripps etc all took significant unders to stay together and improve the list I'm wrapped about it.
Yes because clubs never have long term injury clauses in any contracts...
750ish, same as Curnow and Cripps.Or you have to pay for a salary dump.
Any ideas what the big feller is getting paid?
750ish, same as Curnow and Cripps.
Yes because clubs never have long term injury clauses in any contracts...
Yes because clubs never have long term injury clauses in any contracts...
750ish, same as Curnow and Cripps.
If they do an ACL in year 4 and miss year 5 they can drop the final 2 years? They get 75% less in Year 4, 50% less in 5 and 6?
No more like I've been diagnosed with a chronic back issue that will never allow me to get back on the park consistently for the rest of my career.Or if they get injured 5 years in you have 2 more years stuck with their salary and no other club will touch them.
You then have to convince the player to retire and give up on a huge amount of money.
Is this true?In terms of long-term contracts, they’re not going to work,” Cornes said on SEN Mornings.
“I guarantee you Carlton are going to get burnt, absolutely going to get burnt.
“Harry McKay has got a bad back and they’ve just committed to him for eight years, it’s a big commitment.
“Eight years is ridiculous if you’re going to be completely fair about it.”
---
8 years for a cooked back sounds audacious
No. Cornes coughing up rubbish as always. Had some back issues in his first year or two at the club when he was adding 20kgs of muscle to his frame but hasn't had anything related to it since.Is this true?
So what are the conditions on his contract? And Curnow's?
If they do an ACL in year 4 and miss year 5 they can drop the final 2 years? They get 75% less in Year 4, 50% less in 5 and 6?