- Thread starter
- Banned
- #1,326
No it doesn't. Moderation/curation doesn't make BigFooty analogous to the NYT as a "publisher".Bigfooty like many platforms is wading into publisher territory as it arbitrarily determines which opinions are fine to hold and which aren't.
See above.You can moderate a forum to remain within your TOS and particularly within the law but at some point a line is crossed. Bottom line for this website is it is on its way to becoming a left wing sh*t tip where chief will constantly need to up his virtue to stay out of the sights of the mob meanwhile it'll be dead as a place for political discussion soon enough.
You've got no idea what you're talking about. As usual.
Nonsense. You guys peddle a RW talking point that promotes an outdated dichotomy.You know this but you like to play word games or you don't which means I overestimate you.
The reality is that forums or social media platforms are neither publishers in the traditional sense or mere utilities, like phone companies.
That's why the dichotomy is outdated. Yet you try to shoehorn them into an outdated cateogory of "publisher" because you think it gives you grounds to complain about bias online.
I'm right though, aren't I?You arent worth the time
You are regurgitating a RW talking point you've heard elsewhere - cultivated to build a complaint against perceived bias online - but you don't actually have any footing when it comes to this subject matter. You can't respond to the most obvious challenges to your position because you've never considered your position beyond the opening talking point.
Are you a publisher? You curate social media feeds and post content here. So are you a publisher?
Last edited: