haselbys replacement

[westy1]

who do you reckon should replace haselby
polak,medhurst or murphy ,as far as im concerned murphy should be a walk up starter,even with haselby in the side i would make room for murphy.even at the expense of jlo.

 

[YelloMit]

Webster.

 

[Parry St.]

hey westy1. I'm with yellow mit. Webster got 18 posessions last time we played Melbourne. Also, showed he had a bit when we were embarrassed by Essendon in debut final. Him or Murph.

 

[Borry]

Either Murphy or Webster.

Webster was our best player in the 2003 EF and has been in good form for us recently.

Murphy would be a better and more confident replacement than Medhurst.

 

[westy1]

as good afootballer webster is i just think murphy provides a better foreward target and gives good strong, strait leads therefore staitening up our attacking moves through the guts.one of haselbys unsung strengths is his marking up foreward hence thought behind my selection.

 

[thebigboy]

From an outsiders point of view, webster and murphy should clash for his spot, although a player like polak could come in handy for you guys, especially if someone like carrol for melbourne is out

 

[stylor]

Needs to be Webby or Murphs! Either one will provide a forward option and Webster could be crucial with his delivery into the 50!

 

[Lach72]

Needs to be Webby or Murphs! Either one will provide a forward option and Webster could be crucial with his delivery into the 50!

Murphy and Webster in.
Hase and Schammer out

 

[pinkus maximus]

i am off the schammer bandwagon for th time being and would like webster to come in

murphy for hase