Since when? If you're making a claim, the onus is on you to substantiate that claim.
Who's we in the above sentence? If you need a work-around because you can't support your own statements, that's your issue, not mine.
Is this what you say when you can't support your statements?
The onus is on the person making the claim to substantiate that claim. This is basic stuff.
Otherwise, I might as well say unicorns are real and then challenge you to prove they're not. Is that how it works?
So the claim remains unsubstantiated. In that case, we should disregard it.
It's not a matter of belief. It's a matter of fact. It either happened or it didn't. And if you're going to make a claim about something that supposedly happened, then the onus is on you to substantiate that claim. You can't.
So I ask you again, did Trump seek to enact a military coup or didn't he?
But... but... but Bayesian thinking!
That's not an answer. It's your latest lame attempt to sound smarter than you are.
People have opinions on things all the time where they don’t fully know one way or another, based on events that have happened, and they use their own logic from there.
You think FK supports Trump cos he was used to being the dumbest person in every room? I assume you don’t have actual evidence of this, and would be your option based off things you have pieced together.
This is an Internet forum, not a court of law. Hundreds or thousands of posts are made across all forums here every day which are using opinions/best guesses.
So even though I’ve explained repeatedly why I think what I think and what circumstantial evidence I think exists, short of having an actual recording on me of Trump talking to military saying “so boys when we doing the coup?” then obviously it’s a conspiracy I’m indulging in.