- Nov 7, 2010
- 26,865
- 35,536
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- WADA
Charter boat what charter boat.Not one person in the media has mentioned it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Charter boat what charter boat.Not one person in the media has mentioned it.
Apart ftom selwood still have a month to get it right. We have to win one of our home games v Tigers and GwS and hopefully the Collingwood game. 2 out of those 3 gives a top 4 spot.I don't think I've ever seen everything go to s**t so badly in a Geelong season in such a short amount of time. In two weeks we've gone from 'genuine contender' to 'absolutely no chance of getting anywhere near it.' Wow.
Just quietly Daz, I've been disenfranchised since Joel got reported for pushing his brother years ago. Who would you recommend to follow in the NFL? What are your three fav teams? (Everyone has a second team, sometimes third).
Plenty of brain dead people who believe it was Hocking on his lonesome just like the brain dead people who think Wells makes all the draft decisions on his own.
I don't think I've ever seen everything go to s**t so badly in a Geelong season in such a short amount of time. In two weeks we've gone from 'genuine contender' to 'absolutely no chance of getting anywhere near it.' Wow.
Because the media during and immediately after the game didn't make an issue of it the MRP didn't review it.That is one of my fears about this. We are now a target. Richmond defenders will be scragging, niggling, punching etc from the moment the game starts because they know we will be under strict instruction not to defend ourselves. We also are apparently not allowed to tackle.
Still seething over the Danger one. Duty of care my ass. What about Blicavs being tackled from behind without the ball and having his legs wrapped up, resulting in a broken leg?? Where was Slaone's duty of care relative to the consequence off his action?
Proud Geelong fan all my life. Whole family is right back to 1800s. I go to every victorian game and at least 1 interstate game each year.
I will not be attending anymore games this year because of how spineless our club has become.
We need a review. Bring back Bomber, Balme and Costa. Hocking and Scott have to go.
We are as soft as any club both on and off the field.
I might come to the GWS game to see off SJ.
AND I WILL WEAR ORANGE.
Thanks bud. Good luck the rest of the year.
Yep. Not renewing for me or my family. They can get stuffed.The club will lose memberships over this too, i think they will be surprised by how many.
Pathetic from the club. I'd expect nothing less from Hocking though. Fell into the job after Balme left.
Sent from my SM-A300Y using Tapatalk
I'm done with Steve Hocking. Move him on! Handles departures poorly and I know this because I spoke to him personally in the change rooms the year after chapman left.
They basically did not get on.
Anyone who thinks that Hocking made this decision all on his lonesome without talking to his boss (Cook) and Scott as a minimum really must be clueless.
How the hell can the MRP get away with upping the penalty if a challenge fails? Ludicrous. Could you imagine if this was applied in a court of law everytime an accused wanted to challenge a ruling?? "Sorry there bud we have just increased your sentence for challenging our ruling even though there may be a chance your innocent or we got it wrong." @#$% off!
Just quietly Daz, I've been disenfranchised since Joel got reported for pushing his brother years ago. Who would you recommend to follow in the NFL? What are your three fav teams? (Everyone has a second team, sometimes third).
Turkey and Russia. Anywhere else? Not a system I'd be wanting to live under.Some countries have that you know!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The last two weeks is like 2016 compressed for cats fans.I don't think I've ever seen everything go to s**t so badly in a Geelong season in such a short amount of time. In two weeks we've gone from 'genuine contender' to 'absolutely no chance of getting anywhere near it.' Wow.
This is the issue, its funny how the AFL seem to get what they want at times, at the moment they want:
Melbourne Contending.
Sydney and Buddy winning and all over the TV in NSW
GWS winning and all over the TV in NSW.
Essendon winning more games than they are losing.
Richmond playing in front of 60k week in week out at the MCG
Every decision is made about this. Geelong was supposed to be heading down the ladder now. But sadly the AFL did not look at the English Premier League model and realise that having your own ground is more profitable than playing at the MCG or Etihad, example of this working outside of Geelong are:
GWS in Canberra.
Western Bulldogs in Ballarat
Hawthorn in Launceston
North in Hobart
The Geelong Model works, its against what the AFL want and they are now punishing us for it.
Examples of the above are:
McVeigh 0 Weeks, Hawkins 1 and now 2.
Buddy 0 weeks, Duncan 1
Move heaven and earth to make sure Martin wasn't suspended, but hang Dangerfield out to dry.
I am as frustrated as the next person, but when the AFL have you in the gun, its hard to get out.
Boy am I glad you brought that up,I thought it must have been a bad dream,it did actually happen.
Its about time that the AFL had independent doctors at matches and for MRP issues. At the game they could assess concussions and make recommendations on whether a player is safe to return or not for example. I just wonder if it was a final or if Carlton needed to win to make finals, would Kruezer have returned to the field?. Gut feel is most certainly which means Danger would have had no case to answer. But because they are crap and were getting toweled up, there was no need for him to return to the field which sealed Dangerfields fate at the MRP. An independent body would have put all those if, buts and maybes to bed.
Relying on a club doctor to give a non-bias report or assessment is like asking your mate to be a reference on your CV or give a character reference in court. Its always going to have plenty of mayo on it.
Also, as been mentioned plenty of times before, the system is broken if a player cannot defend them self without risk of extra penalty if the initial charge is upheld. A tribunal by definition is "a body established to settle certain types of disputes" but players and clubs are refusing to defend themselves for that very reason.
Instead of extra weeks, they could maybe look at larger financial sanctions which are picked up by club and player. Maybe $20k on a 75% club/25% player system for example. Resulting monies can be put towards the injured players fund.
I didn't think he was trolling. Just thought he was first to post we are not fighting the suspension on Mitch as we hadn't seen a formal statement from the club.I wondered when the trolls would come.
Remember big tough Tex jamming a guys head into a post then going ooops 'sorry I didn't mean it when I pushed your head into the post I was channeling Hodge coz he got away with it'.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who'd ya speak to, Steve or Chappy?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeh, Kelly's bump. That was a shocker. I don't know why gfc get shafted by the MRP.Mine was when Selwood was suspended from grainy vision and when Kelly and BJ both said to the tribunal that a hit from Kelly DID NOT HIT THE HEAD but the tribunal decided both were lying and upheld the suspension. From there I knew where the game was heading.
Oh and NFL, I'm a Saints fan, love watching the Pats (that will stir some up) and a have soft spot for the Colts.
Only reason I came here was to check if you guys had appealed ... then went to AFL and saw the article.Thanks bud. Good luck the rest of the year.