News Welcome to Hawthorn Tyrone Vickery's cats!
- Thread starter Gene Simmons
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Players go to B&F's. If not, they're wanting out.
- Mar 23, 2007
- 34,930
- 23,534
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man U, Canucks and 49ers
Vickery not attending the Club B&F is pretty severe...
- Sep 27, 2015
- 3,362
- 3,607
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
thats good for us. gives them less of a reason to match. don't want to be stuck with him now.
richmond could play themselves
bumsonseats
Premiership Player
So....if Hawthorn put an offer forward and Richmond matches......we go into trade negotiations.
If trade negotiations fail, is Vickery forced to accept Richmonds offer.
If he doesn't accept their offer, does he become a delisted FA and walks straight to us....?
If trade negotiations fail, is Vickery forced to accept Richmonds offer.
If he doesn't accept their offer, does he become a delisted FA and walks straight to us....?
cryptor
Brownlow Medallist
- May 11, 2008
- 23,490
- 58,807
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
If Richmond match then Vickery can remain unsigned in a sort of limbo status while a trade deal is worked out. If a trade deal can't/won't be made then Vickery can either stay at Richmond on the terms of the matched contract or he can flip off the tigers and walk into the PSD where he can nominate his own contract terms and pray to Burton that he gets drafted by us.
- Sep 15, 2009
- 4,737
- 9,721
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Richmond will not match. They haven't even got an offer on the table. They have only just woken up that they will be getting a lot less in compensation that what they thought they may have. Which tells you a lot about that club.
If $350/ year for 3 years is true, they will be getting an end of 3rd rounder at best. Isn't that what Young got from Collingwood and we got peanuts.
If $350/ year for 3 years is true, they will be getting an end of 3rd rounder at best. Isn't that what Young got from Collingwood and we got peanuts.
Richmond don't want him, they just want to force a trade cause they will likely get jack from FA compo. Problem is Hawthorn can just tell Richmond that they are not not going to trade for him and will move on to other options.
halfback dasher
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Hawthorn Hawks - Lowden, Anderson, Woodward Player Sponsor 2014
Hawthorn Hawks - Box Hill 2013 Sponsor
Hawthorn Hawks - Box Hill 2012
Hawthorn Hawks - Lowden, Anderson, Woodward Player Sponsor 2013
Hawthorn Hawks - Smith and Savage 2011 Player Sponsor
Hawthorn Hawks - Smith and Savage 2012 Player Sponsor
Hawthorn Hawks - Box Hill 2011 Sponsor
Lol ....nice zinger .
Flukey!
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 23, 2005
- 10,268
- 10,960
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Arsenal, Toronto BlueJays
Schoey might be cooked me thinks.
- Oct 6, 2013
- 9,139
- 6,331
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
nah.give him a injury free season and a solid preseason to get up and about for the start of 2017. I think maybe we were forced to put him in with the absence of Roughy. If we had Roughy i reckon we'd have gave him more match fitness before coming into the seniors.
- Oct 2, 2014
- 7,245
- 22,968
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Alright this probably isn't the place to post it but Dermet Brereton made some interesting comments on Shoe.
Originally said that he though he had a shocker of a game and would be very surprised if he stayed in the Hawthorn side next year despite being a valuable structural player.
He then said he went back and watched the tapes of the match, particularly for Shoenmakers. Do you know how many times our boys kicked to Shoenmakers for the whole game? 6 times. Do you know during how many of those times he was 2 v 1? 3 times.
Brereton also remaked that Shoenmakers was getting to the right spots to be utilised but because our players were being so rushed by players like Libratore literally cannoning into the contest that they didn't lower their eyes and utilise the link player. As a result while Shoe had a quiet night, he said that what he originally thought was a shocker was Shoe just not being utilised coupled with our diminished number of forward 50 entrie.
I think Shoe will benefit more from having another key power forward available. He's always been good taking the second defender and becoming a link player, but taking the first defender and physically imposing himself has never been what Shoe was good at.
- Aug 29, 2006
- 4,303
- 4,617
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls
I'm not sure what Richmond supporters are failing to grasp here.
If Richmond match, Hawthorn will not trade. The only reason I imagine we are going after him, is because we can get him for free. If we have to trade for him, its not appealing anymore.
We have far more important players in O'Meara and Mitchell to trade for. All of our tradable assets will be going to Gold Coast and Sydney. Not to Richmond.
- Banned
- #617
I think we would part with a 3rd rounder. Pretty much what they will get if they lose him.
Rearranging deck chairs is what springs to mind.
I don't know if you've ever worked in a job for more than 5 years, but if you have you know that while it's great to have fresh faces/meet new people which can change your perspective on things, at the end of the day your still in the same environment. Tell me, has all the changes the Tigers have gone through in the past 30 years got you closer to winning a premiership? No. This current period of instability you've just gone through with the board challenge and sackings has been the status quo.
If he wants a completely fresh start he can only get that at Hawthorn. Don't fool yourself into thinking otherwise.
I would be testing the market with schoey
- Oct 14, 2011
- 9,668
- 13,505
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Two different players, Shoey plays the high half forward, Vickery would play the old Hale/Roughead role.
- May 12, 2015
- 10,045
- 19,318
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Was one of our best against the cats in what was a pretty willing contest. Had a less than ideal preparation as well.
We look a significantly better side when a 100% fit schoey plays
- Jul 13, 2015
- 36,521
- 40,718
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
They would get a higher 3rd round if they waited on the compo than accepted a trade, wouldnt they?
And if he isnt going to the B&F then surely he is as good as gone.
- Banned
- #623
Yep. A few spots higher. 43
Satchel
Premium Platinum
Veteran
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2021
Hawthorn Hawks - James Cousins Player Sponsor 2021
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2020
Hawthorn Hawks - James Cousins Player Sponsor 2020
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2019
Hawthorn Hawks - James Cousins Player Sponsor 2019
Hawthorn Hawks - Conor Nash Player Sponsor 2018
Good work there Misty, you keep making out that he is a solid contributor week in week out and see if you can find that he has a heap of tricks outside of his run, keep the good story going while wrighty and I see what we can get for him.
Seriously I think he is one we can entertain moving for the right price.
Totally agree - only reason to keep Billy on the list is for the GF sprint
- Mar 23, 2007
- 34,930
- 23,534
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man U, Canucks and 49ers
- Status
Similar threads
