Hawthorn FC worst nightmare the 2017 Draft

Joined
Sep 13, 2000
Posts
66,302
Likes
26,023
Location
Melbourne cricket ground. Australia
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Horks
You're just making up your own history.

Who thought Hodge was finished at 26 years of age? The same fans who now think he's about to have a resurgent golden age?

If you're relying on 28+ yr olds to improve to be your future, you're in real trouble.
With respect. You are talking crap
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

blaisee

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Posts
5,942
Likes
7,545
Location
Punt Road
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
None
Yeah i agree with you. But the reason was:

Hawks wanted to give back to these guys for the few years they have knocked back offers (more $$$) from rivals to stay at the club and win premerships. Accepting offers lower thrn there asking price.

They wanted to return the favor by making there exits as easy as possible.

Hawthorn most certainly wanted more for Lewis. But after the Mitchell deal thet was never going to happen.

Its an awkward situation to be in but in the end hawthorn made the right decision sticking to there word.

What are your thoughts on this blaisee?
Im really torn which way to feel.
I argued to the moon and back that hill was worth more than a high 2nd on here and he is proving so. I want a more hungry aggressive hawthorn this trade period. No more accepting unders.

I am not sure how yiu can argue that getting a good trade deal for a player and allowing to make more money elsewhere are mutually exlusive.

It does not make any sense.


In fact in reality the reverse is true .
 

blaisee

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Posts
5,942
Likes
7,545
Location
Punt Road
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
None
Yep - that's the big stuff up. It was in part because the O'Meara trade was so drawn out that these two were fired off quickly and without us being in any sort of bargaining position. There was talk that Melbourne were going to send a young player our way as part of the Lewis trade but when the hammer came down we had nothing to press them into a higher trade.

From an onfield point of view, from a list management point of view I understand moving them on, but really disappointed in what we got back. Even 2 x 2nd rounders doesn't seem unreasonable. Maybe slow, mature players aren't worth much on the market?

With Deledio - GWS would rightly see him as a final piece to getting a flag, and they have an abundance of high draft pick talent so paying a first rounder for that benefit sounds good. Mitchell and Lewis aren't the missing piece for either club - they're cool, experienced heads in emerging teams

Dunno - just trying to make sense of it.

Whatever deledio is meant to be to gws
Lewis is tgat to Melbourne and Mitchell is tgat to west coast

There is no logical reason as to why they were allowed to walk for nothing .

The only reason has to be because they were not prepared .it is the only thing that makes sense

Either way it was a clear error no doubt
 

Barlow#14

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Posts
5,138
Likes
2,954
AFL Club
Hawthorn
I am not sure how yiu can argue that getting a good trade deal for a player and allowing to make more money elsewhere are mutually exlusive.

It does not make any sense.


In fact in reality the reverse is true .
You may have miss understood what i said.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Gavin Excell

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Posts
25,236
Likes
25,398
Location
Bentleigh
AFL Club
Geelong
Yep - that's the big stuff up. It was in part because the O'Meara trade was so drawn out that these two were fired off quickly and without us being in any sort of bargaining position. There was talk that Melbourne were going to send a young player our way as part of the Lewis trade but when the hammer came down we had nothing to press them into a higher trade.

From an onfield point of view, from a list management point of view I understand moving them on, but really disappointed in what we got back. Even 2 x 2nd rounders doesn't seem unreasonable. Maybe slow, mature players aren't worth much on the market?

With Deledio - GWS would rightly see him as a final piece to getting a flag, and they have an abundance of high draft pick talent so paying a first rounder for that benefit sounds good. Mitchell and Lewis aren't the missing piece for either club - they're cool, experienced heads in emerging teams

Dunno - just trying to make sense of it.
It was also about ensuring that 2 long term servants of the club got to go where they wanted to go without having to enter the draft..Geelong did same a few years accepting the relatively pointless 90 pick from St Kilda to ensure Steven King got there.

Perhaps in the harsh light of an uber competitive world its considered too obliging but is understandable all the same
 

Barlow#14

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Posts
5,138
Likes
2,954
AFL Club
Hawthorn
You said so them a favor and let them go where they want . That's fine , not sure why that means don't get fair value back .

With deledio richmond did both
You have missunderstood all good. Read Gavin Excells post. He may articulate the point i was trying to describe better.

I was also agreeing with you.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

blaisee

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Posts
5,942
Likes
7,545
Location
Punt Road
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
None
It was also about ensuring that 2 long term servants of the club got to go where they wanted to go without having to enter the draft..Geelong did same a few years accepting the relatively pointless 90 pick from St Kilda to ensure Steven King got there.

Perhaps in the harsh light of an uber competitive world its considered too obliging but is understandable all the same
why is that mutually exclusive?
 

andrewb

Premiership Player
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Posts
3,317
Likes
3,164
AFL Club
Essendon
Who is an eligible free agent player for the hawks this year, IE is Gunstan or Bruest a free agent?

This could be the strategy to get rid of a couple of free agents to get a pick in the top 5 of the draft.

Is this possible?
Problem is that we are all starting to see just how good these guys are now without the support in their prime years of Hodge, Mitchell, Lewis, Hill, Burgoyne, Gibson, Lake, Birchall.

Essendon is 17th in the league for I50s (i.e. our midfield is shit) but we have four of the top 30 goalkickers. The players are performing despite the team being average.

By contrast Hawthorn's much vaunted forward line (roughead, rioli, poppy, breust, gunstan, etc) have all had significant declines in performance as the team has declined. Roughead for obvious reasons, rioli has had some injury woes, but you'd have to think that if they traded a gunston/poppy/breust in 2016 they would have got a much better outcome.

You might get a slight bump for the premiership player tag but we're seeing these guys for who they actually are now, not for who they are when they were surrounded by champions. And it's not pretty.
 
Joined
Sep 13, 2000
Posts
66,302
Likes
26,023
Location
Melbourne cricket ground. Australia
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Horks
I see now hill has left he's now in the 'hawk champions who made the others look better' list
Pretty sure he was in the 'made to look good by other champions' list when still a hawk

That seems to be the criteria. Once they leave hawthorn. The status is elevated

Nit picking but hill is barely 22. He's not even in his prime years yet
 

doppleganger

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 4, 2005
Posts
16,055
Likes
7,194
Location
Putney
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Collingwood
It was also about ensuring that 2 long term servants of the club got to go where they wanted to go without having to enter the draft..Geelong did same a few years accepting the relatively pointless 90 pick from St Kilda to ensure Steven King got there.

Perhaps in the harsh light of an uber competitive world its considered too obliging but is understandable all the same
S.King played basically all of his final season @ the Cats in the VFL.

Ottens and Blake were the preferred ruck duo. Geelong offered him a contract commensurate with his ranking on their list...ie that of a VFL level back-up.

King decided he didnt want to cop that so moved on.

If King was the number 1 ruck, had just won the BnF...you reckon the Cats would have low balled him and then moved him on!?

Chalk and cheese
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Sep 13, 2000
Posts
66,302
Likes
26,023
Location
Melbourne cricket ground. Australia
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Horks
S.King played basically all of his final season @ the Cats in the VFL.

Ottens and Blake were the preferred ruck duo. Geelong offered him a contract commensurate with his ranking on their list...ie that of a VFL level back-up.

King decided he didnt want to cop that so moved on.

If King was the number 1 ruck, had just won the BnF...you reckon the Cats would have low balled him and then moved him on!?

Chalk and cheese
He would have done better citing the 'rat pack' dudes do you guys moved along
 

doppleganger

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 4, 2005
Posts
16,055
Likes
7,194
Location
Putney
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Collingwood
Yeah i agree with you. But the reason was:

Hawks wanted to give back to these guys for the few years they have knocked back offers (more $$$) from rivals to stay at the club and win premerships. Accepting offers lower thrn there asking price.

They wanted to return the favor by making there exits as easy as possible.

Hawthorn most certainly wanted more for Lewis. But after the Mitchell deal thet was never going to happen.

Its an awkward situation to be in but in the end hawthorn made the right decision sticking to there word.
Nice story...pity it doesnt actually align with articles and updates coming out of Hawthorn themselves during the trade period.

Reported that Clarko approached Mitchell and Lewis independently to tell them to explore their options.

Came as a shock to Lewis, so his manager then spoke to the Dees. Melbourne were receptive.

When Slug announced he was going, Lewis was told he was a required player and Wright came out confirming he wasnt going anywhere.

But the wheels were in motion, Melbourne decided Lewis was worthy of a 3 year deal, and when Hawthorn were not prepared to extend his contract he was gone.

The Hawks didnt want to lose both of them, but had no interest in extending Lewis' contract.

So Lewis looked after himself and demanded to be traded to Melbourne.

The Hawks could hardly play hardball when it was Clarkson himself who got the ball rolling with his impromptu chat about his footballing mortality.

So end up with top2 in the BnF out the door for peanuts...complete balls up.
 

blaisee

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Posts
5,942
Likes
7,545
Location
Punt Road
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
None
I see now hill has left he's now in the 'hawk champions who made the others look better' list
Pretty sure he was in the 'made to look good by other champions' list when still a hawk

That seems to be the criteria. Once they leave hawthorn. The status is elevated

Nit picking but hill is barely 22. He's not even in his prime years yet
sorry to nit pic, but Hill is 24 in about 3 weeks, saying he is bearely 22, is like me saying he is almost 26
 

Abasi

WINGED GOD
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Posts
57,153
Likes
92,654
Location
Bayside
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Spurs, Socceroos
Moderator #1,647
Nice story...pity it doesnt actually align with articles and updates coming out of Hawthorn themselves during the trade period.

Reported that Clarko approached Mitchell and Lewis independently to tell them to explore their options.

Came as a shock to Lewis, so his manager then spoke to the Dees. Melbourne were receptive.

When Slug announced he was going, Lewis was told he was a required player and Wright came out confirming he wasnt going anywhere.

But the wheels were in motion, Melbourne decided Lewis was worthy of a 3 year deal, and when Hawthorn were not prepared to extend his contract he was gone.

The Hawks didnt want to lose both of them, but had no interest in extending Lewis' contract.

So Lewis looked after himself and demanded to be traded to Melbourne.

The Hawks could hardly play hardball when it was Clarkson himself who got the ball rolling with his impromptu chat about his footballing mortality.

So end up with top2 in the BnF out the door for peanuts...complete balls up.
Hawthorn only ever said Lewis was a required player when it became apparent that Melbourne had backpedalled on their earlier offer of a higher pick. When Hawthorn said "well he's a required player then" Pickering ran to the media and they story broke.
"Hawthorn are trying to trade Jordan Lewis to Melbourne, but now say he's a required player!".

Anyway, you want to harp on about Mitchell and Lewis leaving like they'd have anything to do with our rebuild...and yet Lewis has looked decidedly average this year, and Mitchell is being spoken of as retiring in WA news today.

http://www.watoday.com.au/afl/west-...es-fragile-flag-campaign-20170612-gwp6k1.html
 

Lana

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Posts
8,764
Likes
15,785
AFL Club
GWS
It was also about ensuring that 2 long term servants of the club got to go where they wanted to go without having to enter the draft..Geelong did same a few years accepting the relatively pointless 90 pick from St Kilda to ensure Steven King got there.
That was more to get Gardiner off our books, King was the price we paid.
 
Top Bottom