Correct. For reference below, once the HFC had the report outlining serious allegations they were duty bound by the AFL’s protocol to hand over the report to the AFL integrity unit.
Your life damage argument only applies if the accusations are true. Whereas whether they are or aren’t true their reputations have taken a hit and that’s the point your not getting. As long as it’s an if you can’t use that argument.
No it doesn’t. That doesn’t go away. No matter what happens that’s always going to be against them.
Had a sook about Welcome to Country only a week or two ago aswell.
A development coach.
And because they’ve narrowed down the timeframe it’s not a lot it could be so it brings a number of players into it so instead of 3 it could be out of 6 or 9 or whatever and it groups those players together. In reality they might as well name them because it’s not hard to figure out. I won’t because it’s not my place too.
No he’s not you can’t believe one side and just ignore the other. Treat both with the same respect until which ever side is proven correct if that’s even possible.
That’s the point it’s not about what you believe. It’s about what is known. One of the individuals that it could possibly be has a very checkered history and if it was him which it may well not be, I wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him. Do you honestly think in the history of the world that a group of people haven’t falsely accused anyone. Again not saying this has happened but you can’t assume they are telling the truth on either side.
Well if they are telling the truth you can’t go back in time. I’m not saying they must be named or don’t stay anonymous I’m saying you can’t assume they are telling the truth you have to prove it. You can’t take both sides at face value that’s wrong. That’s why it’s called an investigation. The only bullshit argument is yours. You want to hang draw and quarter the people who’ve been accused and you don’t even know A. if the allegations are true B. Who they are, so we don’t even know the peoples credibility. And C. That 2 of the people who are being accused ( I don’t know much about Burt) have never had any issues with indigenous players if anything it’s been impeccable. Clarkson relationship with various indigenous players has been spot on Burgoyne wingard he personally was responsible for bringing them over to hawthorn. He’s always had a good relationship with rioli until Kennett opened his big mouth. Again I’m not saying that the 3 players are lying I’m saying treat both sides the way because either could be lying.
No I’m not, I’m saying let the investigation find the truth. They could be spot on 100% telling the truth. If they are the investigation is the best chance at proving it. I’m not saying that nothing wrongs been done because I don’t know. I believe everyone has the right to defend themselves. The only one with a bias here is you.
