NO TROLLS Hawthorn Racism Review - Sensitive issues discussed. Part 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don’t use this thread as an opportunity to troll North or any other clubs, you’ll be removed from the discussion. Stick to the topic and please keep it civil and respectful to those involved. Keep personal arguements out of this thread.
Help moderators by not quoting obvious trolls and use the report button, please and thank you.

If you feel upset or need to talk you can call either Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636 or Lifeline on 13 11 14 at any time.

- Crisis support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders 13YARN (13 92 76) 13YARN - Call 13 92 76 | 24 /7

This is a serious topic, please treat it as such.

Videos, statements etc in the OP here:



Link to Hawthorn Statement. - Link to ABC Sports article. - Leaked Report

Process Plan - https://resources.afl.com.au/afl/do...erms-of-Reference-and-Process-Plan-FINAL-.pdf


DO NOT QUOTE THREADS FROM OTHER BOARDS
 
Last edited:
Chief how do you like your eggs? I'm tipping you're an over-easy man
Laid by Hens that only have one wing, the left wing

200.gif
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Looking forward to this inquiry, as promised, being all over by Xmas. Good work AFL.

It means we only have another two weeks before it's all out in the open for all to see.
 
Can we have an inquiry into how many kids were plucked from their family & home and sent interstate to play footy? Make sure to ask how many of them were also denied a family visit when requested.
Actually, could we interview only indigenous peoples please.

I'll start typing up the report... "National Draft Racism Review..."
No leaks please
 
The point is simple, suggesting an abortion to an Aboriginal person who does not want one could be catastrophic. Can you provide the statistics on the following-
How many of the Aboriginals who were having the abortions were from traditional mob backgrounds?
How many were from families linked to stolen generation and Inter generational trauma?
How many of the Abortions were due to rape and violence?

Is there any actual data or research to prove suggesting an abortion to an aboriginal person is more catastrophic on average than it would be to a non-aboriginal person?? Or was that just an assumption?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Absolutely! Trent Cotchin was Dusty’s minder back in the day. He was basically on call 24/7 should Dusty ever need ‘assistance’. And yes, that’s a fact.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Dustin Martin has Maori heritage and claims indigenous Australian heritage based on recognition from groups in Tasmania.
 
Can we have an inquiry into how many kids were plucked from their family & home and sent interstate to play footy? Make sure to ask how many of them were also denied a family visit when requested.
Actually, could we interview only indigenous peoples please.

I'll start typing up the report... "National Draft Racism Review..."
No leaks please

How many of those non Aboriginal kids could not speak English? How many of them were racially abused? How many had horrific backgrounds of disadvantage? How many had to learn a new culture? How many had a different skin colour?
 
Can we have an inquiry into how many kids were plucked from their family & home and sent interstate to play footy? Make sure to ask how many of them were also denied a family visit when requested.
Actually, could we interview only indigenous peoples please.

I'll start typing up the report... "National Draft Racism Review..."
No leaks please
Speechless….
 
The report is irrelevant to what I am saying, I don't care what is says or doesn't say. I am just telling you that any Aboriginal who has links to stolen generation may be severely damaged if an abortion is suggested.

Thanks for sharing. Abortion wasn’t part of the scene back then, but as I said it’s how the individual involved is affected, not how dozens of commentators feel on their behalf.
 
Absolutely! Trent Cotchin was Dusty’s minder back in the day. He was basically on call 24/7 should Dusty ever need ‘assistance’. And yes, that’s a fact.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Richmond's coercive control of a First Nations player doesn't count though.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Richmond's coercive control of a First Nations player doesn't count though.
Whatabout all these other people who haven't made complaints about the way they were treated by there club? Let's see if we can find some other people who may have less serious grievances, suggest they're equivalent, even though they're clearly not. That way the Hawk coach accusations won't look as bad.
 
Last edited:
Can we have an inquiry into how many kids were plucked from their family & home and sent interstate to play footy? Make sure to ask how many of them were also denied a family visit when requested.
Actually, could we interview only indigenous peoples please.

I'll start typing up the report... "National Draft Racism Review..."
No leaks please

... pretty sure indigenous people understand the impact of being plucked from their families..
Nominating for the draft is a bit different..
 
Whatabout all these other people who haven't made complaints about the way they were treated by there club? Let's see if we can find some other people who may have less serious grievances, suggest they're equivalent, even though they're clearly not. That way the Hawk coach accusations won't look as bad.

Gee that sounds a bit like root cause enquiry dangerous in the eyes of the AFL
 
Last edited:
No, they are both stories about indigenous players at Hawthorn having the club impose control on their personal lives during Clarkson's time as coach.

Those are facts.

The reality is that indigenous players at Hawthorn being given "minders" is literally the crux of this whole issue.

You've decided that Buddy being given a minder doesn't need the lens of intergenerational trauma, I'm interested how.

As I said above, I know where you are coming from in that Franklin being given a "minder" doesn't have for mine any racist coercive control element.

But then again, I can see very plausible explanations for all the stuff in Retraction Jackson's story where there's no racist coercive control either.

But you cannot ... or more accurately wont even try it seems.

I only check into this thread every few days to see what the latest attempts from North fans are to try and depict this as a HFC/Egan/Kennett problem rather than a set of very specific allegations directed at Clarkson, Fagan and Burt, but the reaching you’re doing in this thread has become laughable.

Buddy was a 6’5 generational superstar at 20, who had every Tom, Dick and Harry trying to get their claws into him, and you’re making out like the HFC deciding that they needed to look out for him when he was out on the town was because of his skin color rather than him being the biggest thing in this town at such a young age.
 
I only check into this thread every few days to see what the latest attempts from North fans are to try and depict this as a HFC/Egan/Kennett problem rather than a set of very specific allegations directed at Clarkson, Fagan and Burt, but the reaching you’re doing in this thread has become laughable.

The only thing more laughable would be a hawthorn supporter accepting the e allegations as true and then attempting to somehow spin the issues as not a hawthorn problem.

It’s like Optus trying to say, it was the hackers, it’s not an Optus issue.

Bizzare

But I can see how trying to pin the blame on authorised agents of the club in coaching welfare, administration etc and wiping your hands of it from a club post of view, keeps the demons at bay at night for you.

But it’s laughable none the less
 
The only thing more laughable would be a hawthorn supporter accepting the e allegations as true and then attempting to somehow spin the issues as not a hawthorn problem.

It’s like Optus trying to say, it was the hackers, it’s not an Optus issue.

Bizzare

But I can see how trying to pin the blame on authorised agents of the club in coaching welfare, administration etc and wiping your hands of it from a club post of view, keeps the demons at bay at night for you.

But it’s laughable none the less

LOL. Yes, it was such widespread club problem that Shaun Burgoyne quit the club immediately, Impey refused a trade to us years later and Wingard went to the dogs instead. Oh wait, none of that happened, yet some very specific allegations have been leveled at a select few….

But you choose to think it was a club sanctioned thing apparently, we just somehow asked Clarkson, Fagan and Burt to only do it to young draftees, behind closed doors, in secret, without the knowledge of any other indigenous players on the list.
 
LOL. Yes, it was such widespread club problem that Shaun Burgoyne quit the club immediately, Impey refused a trade to us years later and Wingard went to the dogs instead. Oh wait, none of that happened, yet some very specific allegations have been leveled at a select few….

But you choose to think it was a club sanctioned thing apparently, we just somehow asked Clarkson, Fagan and Burt to only do it to young draftees, behind closed doors, in secret, without the knowledge of any other indigenous players on the list.

It was dank, hird and Robinson. It wasn’t Essendon 😂

Newsflash

Organisations are responsible for the actions of their staff.
 
Surely the comparison with Buddy is about the extent the club (and I acknowledge Hawthorn would by no means be alone in it) went to control their players' lives and to mitigate any potential issues and 'distractions'? Different strokes for different folks, and clearly more benevolent appearing treatment for the superstar compared to the long shot rookies.

I can't speak for SBTDOTB, but I was really hoping the overall levels of interference in players lives, in general, would be a core focus that the AFL investigated. Lines are crossed at every club that wouldn't be accepted in the vast vast majority of industries, and certainly from the outside it seems like there are no solidified rules as to how far clubs can go, which would be a failing on the AFL's behalf.
 
It was dank, hird and Robinson. It wasn’t Essendon 😂

Newsflash

Organisations are responsible for the actions of their staff.
You compare these previously unknown incidents to an entire playing list being jabbed by a club/coach wanting their list to get big quick?

What I said earlier about reaching certainly stands.
 
You compare these previously unknown incidents to an entire playing list being jabbed by a club/coach wanting their list to get big quick?

What I said earlier about reaching certainly stands.

It was John Elliot, Craig Bradley and Silvagni that cheated the salary cap. It wasn’t Carlton 😂
 
It was John Elliot, Craig Bradley and Silvagni that cheated the salary cap. It wasn’t Carlton 😂
Another bad comparison and false equivalence. How are you so bad at this?

We’re talking about specific conversations that took place between 2-3 staff and young indigenous players.

Are you suggesting Burgoyne turned a blind eye to these alleged actions by Clarkson, Fagan and Burt?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top