Confirmed Hawthorn trade #30 to North Melbourne for #53, #70 and their 2020 R2 pick

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mr Meeseeks

Premium Gold
Sep 15, 2007
13,278
9,937
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Hawks future 1st alone would get pick 15 at best from the Suns in this draft.

Packaged with pick 11 this year, it may get 5 from swans or 6 from crows with something coming back later in either year.
I would prefer they try and get a second pick ahead of the Finn bid than try and trade up for one higher pick...
 

Suma Magic

Brownlow Medallist
Aug 22, 2009
22,229
23,483
AFL Club
West Coast
Ports future first is worth more than the hawks future first.

Didn’t that only get pick 16 (and port had to add more to the deal to get that).

I’d guess early 20s is the best case scenario for the hawks future first.
 

The Filth Wizard

These Meats Are Spoiled
Jul 26, 2007
64,442
79,149
The Throne
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Arsenal, Gold City Royals
So North have traded a future Rd 2 (26) 729pts, Rd 3 (50) 273pts & Rd 4 (73) 9pts for a Rd 2 (30) 629pts. Why would you do that? I guess North already have two first Rd selections in 2020 & maybe they anticipated that this 2020 Rd2 (26) pick will drift lower. Would that be the case? Even if this was the case the points would probably be even. They must have some compelling motivation.
I think you're bang on the money here.

End of the day we don't have the list spots to use 50 and 73 (we'll upgrade Zurhaar with our pick in the 80's) so those picks are dead to us anyway and with two first rounders next year and the draft rumoured to be fairly compromised up to our second we probably feel we're dropping a pick in the mid 30's next season for 30ish this season. And with 26/27/30/47 to play with there very well may be another move down the order.
 

Crow till I die

Norm Smith Medallist
Jul 6, 2017
7,096
7,040
AFL Club
Adelaide
Id be happy enough if the hawks traded their pick 11 and 2020 1st for our pick 6. Still going to get a good player at 11 and have 3 x 1sts next year to go hard for a particular player that may be out of contract
 

Suma Magic

Brownlow Medallist
Aug 22, 2009
22,229
23,483
AFL Club
West Coast
I guess hawks can only trade in a pick that they can use instantly. Otherwise a risk that the bid comes for their f/s. So this means that they might do their trade after they match a bid, but this won’t impact it as they can still bring in a second top 25 to go with the f/s.
 

BJK#5

Premiership Player
Aug 9, 2017
4,933
16,079
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Hurricanes, Dolphins
Id be happy enough if the hawks traded their pick 11 and 2020 1st for our pick 6. Still going to get a good player at 11 and have 3 x 1sts next year to go hard for a particular player that may be out of contract
I would be very upset if we did, i don't see any stand out players at 6 in this Draft.

decent chance that one of Kemp, Stephens, Robertson, McAsey is still available at 11. I want a 2nd top 20 pick if we are using our future first.
 

the Ziebull

Brownlow Medallist
Nov 14, 2010
16,224
12,223
AFL Club
North Melbourne
hawks did well out of this. they definetly gained while for us it was a net result, we didnt lose or gain

hopefully we package 2 of our picks for 1 higher pick
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Pykie

Brownlow Medallist
Sep 17, 2006
16,005
31,089
Lord's
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
Leeds United
53 and 70 were about to evaporate anyway.

We don’t have the list spots for them and couldn’t take them to the draft, we had to burn them.

Essentially it leaves our 2020 for #30, which with the 10+ academy/nga/fs next year I’d say it’s fairly even.

We obviously value that Gould, Rantall, Taylor, De Koning type group this year I’d say.
 
Last edited:

La Dispute

La Dispute
Jul 14, 2005
10,429
12,441
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Manchester City, Boston Bruins
I think you're bang on the money here.

End of the day we don't have the list spots to use 50 and 73 (we'll upgrade Zurhaar with our pick in the 80's) so those picks are dead to us anyway and with two first rounders next year and the draft rumoured to be fairly compromised up to our second we probably feel we're dropping a pick in the mid 30's next season for 30ish this season. And with 26/27/30/47 to play with there very well may be another move down the order.
I’d say North are backing themselves to be Top 8 material next year so they’re looking to fast-track another second rounder by flipping a few useless picks to Hawthorn.
 

Peel67skin

Norm Smith Medallist
May 21, 2017
7,108
3,305
AFL Club
Gold Coast
Other Teams
Liverpool
Ok so 5 spots for gc
Could be drafting someone on pre season draft maybe Martin or Maybe not, going to let Carlton keep guessing for two more draft night and 1st pick of pre season draft. ( whether pass, call someone else or Jack Martin). Carlton need to allocated one senior spot for Martin not knowing what GCS do with PSD pick 1.
 

Suma Magic

Brownlow Medallist
Aug 22, 2009
22,229
23,483
AFL Club
West Coast
Not sure why hawks fans think they can get pick 15 when pick 16 cost port more than their future first.

Adelaide would be happy to trade it for 23 I’d guess. Hard to see a club before that who would be keen.
 

Top Bottom