- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,410
- 56,127
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Moderator
- #126
Using the same words
bah haaa haaaaaa in the same thread!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Using the same words
Seriously!! What political group funded by which union are on big footy and which do you belong to?
Dan started many threads here, with mostly interesting information I thought, on a variety of missing or murdered victims. However "map spamming" rather than personal attacks were a feature of Dan's posts. This seemed to happen when challenged that his maps were incorrect or meaningless. He responded by posting multiple copies of said maps often in multiple threads. A couple of maps did have interesting information but he could not reproduce or explain them and I assume he got them from somewhere else, not even his.
Not sure why you mention I post in other threads (who doesn't?), especially Pell where Dan and you just jumped in with no idea and with almost the same words. Both of you are not clever enough to know you've missed the point completely. Using the same words as Wacko Kooky again in this thread, so why don't you man up and admit it?
bah haaa haaaaaa in the same thread!
Think it was Mr Whacko Kooky.
It's the only bit of the post I understand.
There is no slander Dan, you signed your posts multiple times as Mr Whacko Kocky and sometimes added tinfoil. I praised your early posts in multiple threads you started as they contained interesting summary of information in each.Im not going to enter into some petty bickering about your slander. I guess the difference is, I have my cards down on the table. I have the invested information. Some of that info has been deleted, and hidden. Maybe for court purposes. I'm happily proved wrong long term but it looks like I'm the only one with the balls, fact and the links to back up much what I have said.
For the most part, when people look back, the rest are just here for the cheap shots with little original comment. Quick to attack people who have no right of reply.
Interesting now, not sure Wark would get parole being the the hitch hiker killer.
Will we ever hear of Hayleys stashing place? Where would the rest of her possessions be? She had a backpack? What other items did she have in the bag? No doubt that backpack is somewhere. Nothing found?
An hour and half. That is an hour window really. 30 minutes to do what he did.
Fellow motorcycle enthusiast Catherine Mary Edwards had been staying at Wark's house for the previous two nights with her boyfriend Paul Springer and said the couple began their journey back to Perth around 8.30am that morning while the accused went to Moora for an appointment.
Wark claims he shopped and went to the bank, video store, post office and newsagent before stopping at the bakery for lunch.
"I thought that he had a definite appointment there. I was never told what it was," Ms Edwards told the WA Supreme Court on Thursday via video link from Albany.
The state says Wark lured Ms Dodd into his ute between 11.40am and midday, murdered her and disposed of her body before 1.36pm when he paid an account at Badgingarra roadhouse while riding his motorcycle to Perth.
He planned to go to Ms Edwards and Mr Springer's Beaconsfield house as they were having a party that weekend but had an accident in the city's southern suburbs and was taken to hospital.
Prosecutor Amanda Burrows told the court during openings that when Wark quit his local job as a part-time primary school gardener, he told people he had terminal cancer and was going to Queensland to die.
http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/h...tant-to-reveal-movements-20171019-gz4cch.html
Mr Spry said during the two-hour trip, Hayley, who had planned to visit a friend’s farm near Moora, was looking at a map and held her backpack on her lap before placing it at her feet.
https://thewest.com.au/news/crime/h...hayley-dodds-last-conversations-ng-b88627343z
30 minutes at 100 km/h from Warks house as a rough guide.
Many conflicting witness reports for the Judge to sift through!http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/__482562ff000972b4.nsf/6c31d3fe4d9d6e61482565cb00104355/765ac26d3571662b4825821d000ba8bd?Open&Name=Supreme/SupCourt
THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- WARK [No 2] [2018] WASC 18
Jurisdiction:SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2018] WASC 18Case No:INS:370/2016Heard:9 OCTOBER - 24 NOVEMBER 2017Coram:JENKINS JDelivered:22/01/18No of pages:196Judgment Part:3 of 4Result:
Theres a whole lot of information to look at further in the pdf link .
There is no slander Dan, you signed your posts multiple times as Mr Whacko Kocky and sometimes added tinfoil. I praised your early posts in multiple threads you started as they contained interesting summary of information in each.
Sifting though the information from the telstra workers ... phew?? Some of it got chucked! What were the cops doing casually turning up to a farm they were working on? When does that happen?http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/__482562ff000972b4.nsf/6c31d3fe4d9d6e61482565cb00104355/765ac26d3571662b4825821d000ba8bd?Open&Name=Supreme/SupCourt
THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- WARK [No 2] [2018] WASC 18
Jurisdiction:SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2018] WASC 18Case No:INS:370/2016Heard:9 OCTOBER - 24 NOVEMBER 2017Coram:JENKINS JDelivered:22/01/18No of pages:196Judgment Part:3 of 4Result:
Theres a whole lot of information to look at further in the pdf link .
Yes DB that sounds highly likely , many news reports wrote that in the last few days.Did I read front of the West in a petrol station this morning that Wark may appeal?
Anyone seen todays West /Sunday Times?
http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/__482562ff000972b4.nsf/6c31d3fe4d9d6e61482565cb00104355/765ac26d3571662b4825821d000ba8bd?Open&Name=Supreme/SupCourt
THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA -v- WARK [No 2] [2018] WASC 18
Jurisdiction:SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2018] WASC 18Case No:INS:370/2016Heard:9 OCTOBER - 24 NOVEMBER 2017Coram:JENKINS JDelivered:22/01/18No of pages:196Judgment Part:3 of 4Result:
Theres a whole lot of information to look at further in the pdf link .
They do say pets and owners start to morph into one an the other'Mr Piggy'
Warks dog possibly was named Miss Piggy because of the pigdog type breed...
A man pulled over on roadside says he heard a scream and dog barking around the time of H.D's disappearance.
Why would the dog bark, perhaps she got jealous or excited ?
Perhaps theres rspca records or history of Warks or McConnells dogs being mistreated..
Pictures of potential dog breed miss piggy, Warks traveling copilot .
https://goo.gl/images/zToFsh
https://goo.gl/images/wuuVua
Moto Guzzi? He's no 'bikie' and yes I'm serious, they just don't ride them."Although he did not make a lot of friends, Wark did his best to fit in, joining the local darts team and selling himself as something of a local handyman who would roar around town on his Moto Guzzi motorcycle with his beloved bull terrier Miss Piggy perched on the fuel tank.
He was trusted enough to be offered a part-time job as the gardener at the local primary school."
The floors were dirt in some of the rooms, yet somehow Wark managed to attract a Filipino wife to live there with him in 1992. Their relationship was rumoured to be violent and they had split up well before Hayley’s murder.
Wark headed east on his bike with Miss Piggy to start a new life.
When asked if he would have let his victim go, his words were chilling.
“I doubt it.” "
https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/the-real-frank-wark-from-quiet-man-to-sadistic-rapist-ng-b88723389z
I don't know if pointing to other perps would be an avenue of appeal, but would have thought there are a couple of other avenues. Have to wait and see.Thanks BlueE I think I can see the area of Appeal that might be tried
Depends on how the law's actually written, ie, what does the LAW state? I don't for one second believe that 'someone on the periphery' will be subject to the legislation.Tom Percy on the No body No Parole law. https://www.perthnow.com.au/opinion/tom-percy/tom-percy-tragic-flaw-in-the-law-ng-b88725544z
The provisions of the Criminal Code make all sorts of people guilty of homicide although they played no part in the infliction of any fatal injuries to the deceased.
The State Government’s new Sentence Administration Amendment Bill 2017 proposes that anyone involved (which is widely defined) in a homicide will never be eligible for release on parole unless they reveal the location of the victim’s remains.
The motivation behind the Bill is entirely sensible and the recovery of victim’s remains an integral part of the grieving family being able to come to terms with their loss.
After Francis John Wark was this week found guilty of the 1999 murder of teenager Hayley Dodd, her family had a message for the 61-year-old killer: “Tell us where Hayley is so we can put her to rest.”
However, this proposed legislation is crude, blunt and poorly thought out.
An incentive to reveal the location of a victim’s remains is a noble idea, but any legislation dealing the matter should take into account the fact that there will be many cases where that information is simply not in the offender’s knowledge.
It is palpably unfair to deal with those offenders who may have been on the periphery of a homicide as severely as those who acted alone and callously refused to reveal the last location of their victim.
For example, in Vic:Depends on how the law's actually written, ie, what does the LAW state? I don't for one second believe that 'someone on the periphery' will be subject to the legislation.