Remove this Banner Ad

Hello

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You raise an interesting point.

The OP had 149 likes when I bumped the thread.

But the like system cannot have been introduced earlier than about seven years ago.

So either 149 users stumbled across the thread and liked it from 2009 on, with none of them bothering to reply, or this thread has been bumped before and the mods have deleted any post later than 1999 to retain the original post and response for posterity.

Likes are nowhere near 7 years old, try about 2.

BF had "rep" (similar to bb.com and the like) a long, long time ago iirc. Potentially a remnant of that?

Or just 170 people spotted it today which isn't ootq.
 
You raise an interesting point.

The OP had 149 likes when I bumped the thread.

But the like system cannot have been introduced earlier than about seven years ago.

So either 149 users stumbled across the thread and liked it from 2009 on, with none of them bothering to reply, or this thread has been bumped before and the mods have deleted any post later than 1999 to retain the original post and response for posterity.
The plot thickens!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Hey I remember the year well and it I'd like to think he/she is still around. Probably a bit confused by the ambiguous sexual identication.

I'm a doctor, I know when someone is dead.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Whilst its seemingly bigfooty history month, heres the earliest snapshot i could find of the sight in may 2000. Gotta hand it to this website, its done well to be this strong for such an early start.View attachment 269730.
Great to see geelong4eva's name on that.

R.I.P geelong4eva
 
I wonder what email provider he used to sign up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top